• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

If "everything is energy" then what does this mean?

Status
Not open for further replies.

idav

Being
Premium Member
You want to stay asleep in the dream? Nice 'n comfy.
The brain is the most powerful machine we know of. It can do wonderous things including giving us the illusion that we are tapping into more than there actually is.
 

godnotgod

Thou art That
The brain is the most powerful machine we know of. It can do wonderous things including giving us the illusion that we are tapping into more than there actually is.

Think of how much more powerful Consciousness is in that it is responsible for the Universe you see, including the brain.

The brain is also where delusion occurs.
 

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
This is in accordance with the fact that all of the mass of the atom is virtual, and with the Hindu idea that all material reality is maya.

You want to apply conventional Logic to something that is beyond Logic and Reason to question how Brahman 'brings about' maya. It does not occur in Space or Time, but in Consciousness, a kind of analogy being how consciousness 'brings about' the illusions found in the dream. Nothing is actually being created or occurring. It's an illusion.
The Hindu idea is not/never that the material reality is 'maya', in no branch of Hindu philosophy. Some philosophies say that the way it is perceived is not true. That is 'maya' (Advaita, Mayavada, snake and rope). At the back of the wrongly perceived reality is what is actually real, Brahman. So in effect, all things are Brahman only - 'Sarvam Khalu Idam Brahma'. You need to revise your information on Hindu philosophies. Wikipedia explains them nicely. Nothing is actually being created because you are perceiving Brahman which exists everywhere in your own way giving rise to the feeling that things are created. The bedrock still is Brahman. All that happens in time and space. And that Brahman is incessantly changing. Material reality is not a dream, it is a fact, but at a lower level - Vyavaharika Satya. The absolute truth is Brahman only, the Parmarthika Satya. Consciousness arises in living beings because of how what constitutes it (Brahman) gets configured. When that configuration is destroyed, consciousness of a living being also is destroyed. Human consciousness is a very local thing.
 

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
OK, so let us forget Buddha. What is it specifically about what Thurman said that you disagree with and why?
"In listening to Thurman, it sounds to me as if he is saying that the atom is not solid material, and that there is a collapse of the material into the non-material at some point. This is in accordance with Quantum Physics."

Sure, atom can be taken as energy, non-material. But that is not the same as a 'void' or 'absolute nothing' according to quantum physics.
 

godnotgod

Thou art That
The Hindu idea is not/never that the material reality is 'maya', in no branch of Hindu philosophy. Some philosophies say that the way it is perceived is not true. That is 'maya' (Advaita, Mayavada, snake and rope). At the back of the wrongly perceived reality is what is actually real, Brahman. So in effect, all things are Brahman only - 'Sarvam Khalu Idam Brahma'. You need to revise your information on Hindu philosophies. Wikipedia explains them nicely. Nothing is actually being created because you are perceiving Brahman which exists everywhere in your own way giving rise to the feeling that things are created. The bedrock still is Brahman. All that happens in time and space. And that Brahman is incessantly changing. Material reality is not a dream, it is a fact, but at a lower level - Vyavaharika Satya. The absolute truth is Brahman only, the Parmarthika Satya. Consciousness arises in living beings because of how what constitutes it (Brahman) gets configured. When that configuration is destroyed, consciousness of a living being also is destroyed. Human consciousness is a very local thing.

We have proven that it is non-local, and the experiment has now been repeated several times. The idea of localized human consciousness is now the old paradigm that most people still adhere to, just as they cannot yet accept the Quantum world and still cling to Newtonian biliard ball physics and Relativity. Do you want me to post the video once again?

I agree with all you've stated re: Brahman except for your position that Brahman is not maya. The world is indeed Brahman, playing itself as 'the world', otherwise known as maya. How can you say that the world is real, when it is maya, that we wrongly perceive as being real.

One example that the material reality is maya comes from the Vedantist Vivekenanda, that I repeat often:


"The Universe IS The Absolute, as seen through the glass of Time, Space, and Causation"
, and again clearly here:

http://www.discovervedanta.com/downloads/articles/brahman-and-maya.pdf

If, as you say, nothing is being created because Brahman is everywhere, then too, nothing is interacting nor changing, because there is nothing to interact or change, Brahman being The Changeless Absolute. Wikipedia clearly states that:


"It [Brahman] is the pervasive, genderless, infinite, eternal truth and bliss which does not change, yet is the cause of all changes"

No! Nothing happens in Time and Space because Time and Space are concepts only; not realities! The Big Bang 'occurred' in Not-Time and Not-Space, since Space-Time was theoretically created WITH the BB, but was not present prior to the BB.


You alluded to 'that Brahman', as if there are two Brahmans: the Absolute Brahman and the material Brahman. No. There is only Brahman, and the world is in fact Brahman, playing as the world.

Only the configuration is destroyed; Consciousness, which is Brahman, cannot be destroyed.

 

godnotgod

Thou art That
"In listening to Thurman, it sounds to me as if he is saying that the atom is not solid material, and that there is a collapse of the material into the non-material at some point. This is in accordance with Quantum Physics."

Sure, atom can be taken as energy, non-material. But that is not the same as a 'void' or 'absolute nothing' according to quantum physics.

No! That is not what Thurman is saying. He is only saying, as the Buddha said, that the atom is not the final indivisible reality we thought it to be. Having said that, what we call 'something' is of a material nature. But because of this collapse, it is not material. It only behaves AS IF it is material. Therefore, it is virtual. Thurman did say that it 'disappears'. If it disappears, there is nothing there. Or do you still see something there?
 

Jumi

Well-Known Member
Where it's always been: right here, right now. What? We did not create consciousness; consciousness created us. The Big Bang was an event in Consciousness. But it is not 'my' consciousness; 'yours' and 'mine' are only illusions.
Can't say I've always been. In my experience memories start at age 3 and consciousness had slowly developed into adulthood.
 

godnotgod

Thou art That
The Hindu idea is not/never that the material reality is 'maya', in no branch of Hindu philosophy.

"All things -- from Brahma the creator down to a single blade of grass -- are. . .simply appearances and not real."

Shankara, the famous Hindu philosopher
*****

may01.png

maya02.png


http://www.hinduwebsite.com/hinduism/essays/maya.asp

This is in perfect accordance with Vivekenanda's statement that:

"The Universe is The Absolute, as seen through the glass of Time, Space, and Causation"
*****


"The analogy of materialism rested upon the illusion that the kind of existence, the direct 'actuality' of the world around us, can be extrapolated into the atomic range. This extrapolation, however, is impossible...Atoms are not things."

Walter Heisenberg
 
Last edited:

godnotgod

Thou art That
Can't say I've always been. In my experience memories start at age 3 and consciousness had slowly developed into adulthood.

No, not 'you', meaning 'I' from your perspective. 'I' only exists as a result of our social indoctrination, but consciousness is always present. It is not consciousness that is 'developed'; it is the 'I', in turn developed by the thinking mind, a self-created principle.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top