So does this mean that men have to live at home with their parents because now they are the same as women?
You have to ask the pregnant man not me
I am just telling you facts
I don't agree with what he did
Never
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
So does this mean that men have to live at home with their parents because now they are the same as women?
I'm 25 (26 in a few weeks), not transgendered, but I live with my parents. ^_^ (Well, my mom.)
Why women should not be protected
It easy to take advantage from women
They will tell her that they love her and they care about her
Then once men take her virginity they leave her alone
And the best solution for that is to teach women how to catch and avoid such men. It's not impossible.
You are absolutely right and that what Islam teachs too.
Can you stop your daughter if she was young enough (over 18) and wanted to work as a porn star ?
Even if you want to stop her,she can stop you if you insist to annoy her.
Am i wrong.
Why women should not be protected
It easy to take advantage from women
They will tell her that they love her and they care about her
Then once men take her virginity they leave her alone
Actually women can also take advantage of men too.
But if Arab men are going around taking advantage of women in Arab countries are they as moral as you imagine them to be?
What advantage women get from men after ******* her,would you pls explain.
Feelings of empowerment, sexual satisfaction... basically everything that men would get.
Furthermore, it could be used for blackmail.
So your not denying the Bible has equal amounts of violence as the Qur'an?
I read the whole thing and you haven't presented any evidence.
The Bible doesn't have "Minor" inconsistencies. There are several large one's.
So the best is a respectful relationship between both,which isn't for the purpose of sex,blackmail...etc,but a relation based on love and respect.
That what Islam teaches.
That's fine.
Unfortunately, it takes more than a religion to make such things mainstream, and in the Islamic world, this Islamic teaching is all too often ignored completely.
Does Islam have a feminist movement, or some kind of equivalent, to help combat this fact? (If it doesn't, that's not a slam against Islam itself, mind you.)
That's true.
Islamic countries aren't ruled by Islamic laws.
[youtube]hu5py5rUCQk[/youtube]
Hadith: Return of the Khilafah - YouTube
What advantage women get from men after ******* her,would you pls explain.
Islam teach that men should respect women and even avoid looking at them (lower their gaze)...
If I understood correctly, the argument presented in this short video is that the return of the Caliphate (and possibly its endurance) have been foretold by the Prophet?
So your point is that it when the Caliphate returns, then there will be Islamic rule in countries of Islamic majority?
They can take advantage of men for money, then leave the men afterwards.
My point was made with respect to attempts at portraying men in the UAE as being more moral than other men.
If the men are practicing the teaching of Islam why do the women need to be protected from them?
On the other hand if the men are not practicing religion are they more moral than western people?
If a person embraces the scriptures and traditions of his religion at face value without taking into account the world as it is and has always been, then yes many of the theological claims of many religions, including Islam can be dismissed with logic or science. On the other hand if a person treats their religion (or culture) as an ethos, a heritage, and traditions which should be understood for their inherit wisdom, rather than 100% literal stories then religion can be quite potent and not so easily dismissed. In fact in the latter case I would say that a religion can find a more healthy and constructive place in the jigsaw of human cultures.What I'd like to achieve with this debate is not necessarily a conclusion.
I hope to achieve greater clarity to wether or not my religion can be dismissed either with logical deduction or scientific proof.
Exactly it was foretold by the prophet and all stages have been achieved except the last stage and all signs are pointing that the Caliphate (last stage) is coming soon.
So, you think that muslims are incapable of ruling themselves and need to be under the thumb of a tyrant? You might have a point given the bloody chaos that has happened lately when muslims have rid themselves of tyrants.
For other peoples, freedom is preferred.
If a person embraces the scriptures and traditions of his religion at face value without taking into account the world as it is and has always been, then yes many of the theological claims of many religions, including Islam can be dismissed with logic or science. On the other hand if a person treats their religion (or culture) as an ethos, a heritage, and traditions which should be understood for their inherit wisdom, rather than 100% literal stories then religion can be quite potent and not so easily dismissed. In fact in the latter case I would say that a religion can find a more healthy and constructive place in the jigsaw of human cultures.
For example, I can appreciate the many stands and parables of Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount. But I completely dismiss the theological claim that he turned water into wine, based on scientific reason. And also based on the fact that the idea of turning water into wine may simply contain cultural ideas from the time of the writing of the gospels, which may hold merit in them when we do not literalize the narrative.
Likewise, I don't believe that the stories about Muhammad riding a flying steed from Mecca to Jerusalem, or slicing the moon in half, etc. Hold any water when treated as facts. (Whether the traditions are found in the Qur'an, Hadith and Sunnah, or other Islamic sources).