Surya Deva
Well-Known Member
There are two arguments:
The bridge is man-made
The bridge is natural
It's not thouasands of years old, it is more than a million years old. If it is man-made then we have to accept the Ramayana is a historical event that took place 1 million years ago, which also means that it was a high technology culture. That will mean rewriting history completely, and before we go doing that, we need proof that it is man-made. Until then we have to accept it is natural and its description in the Ramayana is mere coincidental.
The bridge is man-made
The bridge is natural
It's not thouasands of years old, it is more than a million years old. If it is man-made then we have to accept the Ramayana is a historical event that took place 1 million years ago, which also means that it was a high technology culture. That will mean rewriting history completely, and before we go doing that, we need proof that it is man-made. Until then we have to accept it is natural and its description in the Ramayana is mere coincidental.