See I think this is wear some get stumped.
Like who?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
See I think this is wear some get stumped.
However while it is entirely possible that Tom MAY be a bigot, it is also entirely possible that this scenario can arise without bigotry simply based on the idea of having a personal preference in sexual partners that is cis-female.
Like who?
Then it is up to him to dictate the parameters of disclosure BEFORE the one night stand...He didn't say 'full' though.
Except he did want to have sex with her.That she should assume she is undesirable, she is not really female, and that guys are very likely going to not want to have sex with her, and act accordingly.
That she should assume she is undesirable, she is not really female, and that guys are very likely going to not want to have sex with her, and act accordingly.
Then it is up to him to dictate the parameters of disclosure BEFORE the one night stand...
Except he did want to have sex with her.
So much so that he let his erection override everything else
I must have missed it.He has already explained about this specific point to great lengths...
Just like i did.
I will edit it to properly fit what i said:
1) She is not a cisgender female.
2) Many guys are very likely going to not want to have sex with her if they know she is trans.
3) She shouldn't let people who she is going to have sex with to be mislead into believing she is a cisgender female.
If these sentences are equal to what you understand by 'she should know her place', then so be it.
Yes. And that is precisely why such a view is transphobic and cis-normative.
I would expect her to recognize that it was something that could significantly effect my decision and thus I had a right to know - just as I would consider it my responsibility to disclose anything that I thought could be considered (by a not insignificant proportion of women) relevant to the choice to hook up. But then again perhaps this a good part of the reason why I would never survive on the casual sex frontier.You really expect full disclosure for a one night stand?
No one in particular just in general.What I was talking about yesterday.The idea that no matter what they look like on the outside they are still males.
I must have missed it.
Would you please be so kind as to point out the post numbers where this explanation resides?
I disagree.
What arguments can you present?
Any argument that doesn't load the word previously with your intended meaning?
How is she to know what you do and do not find relevant to the decision of having a one night stand with someone unless you tell her?I would expect her to recognize that it was something that could significantly effect my decision and thus I had a right to know - just as I would consider it my responsibility to disclose anything that I thought could be considered (by a not insignificant proportion of women) relevant to the choice to hook up. But then again perhaps this a good part of the reason why I would never survive on the casual sex frontier.
I do not understand the relevance of this...Also were I some violent bigot then it would be far safer for her to ensure that she knew upfront, rather than potentially finding out later (because the unexpected can happen) and being placed in a dangerous situation. For that reason, sounding out a potential partner while in a safe relatively public place (where there was sufficient privacy to have a private word yet public enough to have observable reactions identified) would seem a good idea. Of course there would be the temptation to not disclose the truth in order to protect herself from bigots, I can understand that - but tbh, its probably safer not to hook up with them to begin with. Though who knows maybe she picks them on purpose to get her kicks lol
LOL you actually spelled it out, Koldo. I'm just stating the obvious that in a cis-normative society, people will largely be transphobic and wish to not have sex with a trans person regardless of whether or not that person is post-op or not.
Are you arguing that a cis-normative society is a healthy, normal, and ideal society?
Once you say that people who do not wish to have sex with a trans person are transphobic it is easy to say that my view is transphobic.
I am still waiting for you to say what arguments could lead to this conclusion without loading the word previously.
Yes. And that is precisely why such a view is transphobic and cis-normative.
So your argument is that it should have been apparent to her as a reasonable person ....Check post #423. More specifically the last paragraph.