So the next guy to come along may well not be in 950 years, but in 2 weeks?
?????
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
So the next guy to come along may well not be in 950 years, but in 2 weeks?
No matter how you try to justify it, Baha'u'llah states in the clearest manner that he believes the flood took over all of earth and destroyed everything and Noah live for 950 years.
Judaism, Christianity, Islam, and all true religions are from the same God so you'd expect to see more or less the same concepts. Judaism has as many differences with Islam as it has similarities. For example, the story of Lot being intoxicated by his daughters and then raped by them, or stories of other Prophets committing adultery are categorically denied in the Shia Islamic belief. Prophets have to be infallible if they are to guide other people to guidance. That is why we believe the stories in the Old and New Testament have suffered from distortion because obviously God would not dispatch such Prophets.
As for the moon splitting, it was considered a miracle from an Omnipotent God. I don't expect someone who does not believe in God or miracles to believe this event ever occurred.
Where does a person stop making things "symbolic" and "allegorical"? Creation? Allegory. The Flood? Allegory. Satan? Allegory. Jesus rising from the dead? Allegory. God???
And Your statement is just an ignorant fabrication.The Shia is just a Persian fabrication.
I wasn't referring to you. I simply meant that someone who doesn't believe in God or His Omnipotence won't believe in miracles either. BTW, you avatar is very creative.
So the next guy to come along may well not be in 950 years, but in 2 weeks?
There are literally thousands of messiah claimants, probably some new guy every week. So yeah, why not? Maybe one of them is right. Then again, maybe not.It worked for Bahaullah, so why not?
There are literally thousands of messiah claimants, probably some new guy every week. So yeah, why not? Maybe one of them is right. Then again, maybe not.
Just so you know, (you're late to the discussion) I don't believe in saviour, avatar, any of those. I do believe in wise men. So for me personally it's nobody. But the idea seems to work for some people, so it's fine, I respect their right to believe that.Maybe I'm the savior? Or maybe you are? who knows
Just so you know, (you're late to the discussion) I don't believe in saviour, avatar, any of those. I do believe in wise men. So for me personally it's nobody. But the idea seems to work for some people, so it's fine, I respect their right to believe that.
This is obviously a response to the other thread I created where I showed Baha'u'llah believes the flood is real and it had encompassed all earth and destroyed everything:
Noah's Flood from a Baha'i perspective, fact or fantasy?
Unfortunately if our Baha'i friend here has paid more attention to the writings of Baha'u'llah he would have noticed that Baha'u'llah also believed that Noah had lived for at least 950 years:
“Among the Prophets was Noah. For nine hundred and fifty years He prayerfully exhorted His people and summoned them to the haven of security and peace. None, however, heeded His call.” (Baha'u'llah, The Kitab-i Iqan)
And as usual, faced with a dilemma, his successor without providing any meaningless argument contradicts the founder and claims:
"The years of Noah are not years as we count them, and as our teachings do not state that this reference to years means His dispensation, we cannot interpret it this way." (From a letter written on behalf of the Guardian to an individual believer, November 25, 1950; quoted in Lights of Guidance, no. 1659)
I have rarely seen a statement in Baha'i scripture that has not been contradicted by one or all the leaders.
In the belief of Shia Islam the only person that has the right to choose the successor to a Prophet is the same one that dispatched that Prophet: meaning God. So Muhammad had no say in who should or could be his successor. It was God that chose Ali, no one else had a say in this not even the Prophet.
Where does a person stop making things "symbolic" and "allegorical"? Creation? Allegory. The Flood? Allegory. Satan? Allegory. Jesus rising from the dead? Allegory. God???
According to Baha'u'llah, Noah a metaphorical Prophet, preached for 950 metaphorical years, and then a metaphorical flood destroyed his metaphorical people while he was saved in a metaphorical ship. Does it make more sense now or do I sound like a nutjob?
Then don't chuck the baby out with the bathwater.Over the years I have seen them all, and yes there are archaeological finds that confirm individual events, facts and people in the Bible, but there are also many, many finds that demonstrates contradictions and very real problems with Biblical accounts. Many cited by @joeil
Archaeological, historical and Geological objective verifiable evidence before they can be considered factual history..
The Tora mentioned that Noah lived 950 years as well.
What if the food was better before the flood? We see that the people start living lesser and lesser. What if a certain food that they were eating wasn't there anymore after the flood?
Jesus Christ raised dead people as a sign. And healed the blind. And healed lepers. What if it is true? What if it's not allegorical? Everything is possible with Gods Power after all?