• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Israel Should Be Stopped

Niatero

*banned*
No matter the extent of leadership's
power or representing the people,
Israel must be stopped from pursuing
genocide & WW3.
What’s your plan for stopping it?

This is a side of Revoltingest that I’ve never seen before. Of course, I’ve never looked at any political discussions before.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Remember, folks: Hamas are bad, therefore killing children is fine.

Literally, you hear "children killed by Israeli airstrike" and your first response is "Well, that's less suicide bombers for Hamas!"

Monstrous.
No. Not really. I think it's absolutely tragic, but to think these people care about their own children is absolutely insane by virtue of their past actions.
 

ImmortalFlame

Woke gremlin
No. Not really. I think it's absolutely tragic,
Then blame the people doing it. Don't divert attention and responsibility to other groups doing other evil stuff to children as if the existence of one justifies or necessitates the other.

but to think these people care about their own children is absolutely insane by virtue of their past actions.
I have never once seen anyone on these forums claim that Hamas care about children, or any other Gazan civilian. Whether or not they care is irrelevant to the matter of whether certain actions taken by other groups directly contribute to the death and harm of children in such a way that is not reasonably justified or moderate.

In other words "These children were unjustly killed as a consequence of Israel's actions and policies" and "These children were unjustly killed by Hamas as a consequence of their extremism and terrorism" can both be true and both be worthy of criticism, and pointing one out doesn't discount or discredit the other.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Yep. Less child suicide bombers for Palestinian militants to use against Israel.
There shouldn't be any.
Hamas must be royally pissed. You cannot win hearts and minds of those who have no hearts and minds in the first place.
It's that kind of bigotry that is driving Israel
to insane paranoia, resulting in the genocide
we see them pursue against Palestinians.
They could care less about their children.
To believe that other people don't care about
their children is more hideous bigotry.
This is what Zionism has become, & it must
be stopped.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
What’s your plan for stopping it?

This is a side of Revoltingest that I’ve never seen before. Of course, I’ve never looked at any political discussions before.
So many threads with so many posts.
Some thoughts about stopping Israel....
- End financial support.
- End military support.
- Stop sending them weapons.
- Protect Palestinians.
- Send food, water, medicine, clothing, housing, etc to Gaza.
- Economic embargo until apartheid & genocide end.
- Create Palestinian state.
- Negotiate with Hamas & others peace in exchange
for measurable progress on the above.

History shows that offering justice, rule of law,
economic prosperity, & autonomy have been
a path to peace. That's not yet been tried by
Israel, & it's long past due.
 

Niatero

*banned*
So many threads with so many posts.
Some thoughts about stopping Israel....
- End financial support.
- End military support.
- Stop sending them weapons.
- Protect Palestinians.
- Send food, water, medicine, clothing, housing, etc to Gaza.
- Economic embargo until apartheid & genocide end.
- Create Palestinian state.
- Negotiate with Hamas & others peace in exchange
for measurable progress on the above.

History shows that offering justice, rule of law,
economic prosperity, & autonomy have been
a path to peace. That's not yet been tried by
Israel, & it's long past due.
Okay, thanks. :) I liked seeing your serious side, but I'm not planning to visit any more threads about political issues. I was just curious when I saw that it was you who started this thread.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Okay, thanks. :) I liked seeing your serious side, but I'm not planning to visit any more threads about political issues. I was just curious when I saw that it was you who started this thread.
No one posts more about politics than I.
But neither man nor Scot lives by serious topics alone.
And the humor forum is where we go to have fun, &
lessen the loathing of vexatious posters.
 
Last edited:

David1967

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
I imagine the only people who can stop Israel are the people of Israel.
If the USA stops propping them up with an unlimited supply of weapons and taxpayer dollars that could better be spent here at home on our own people, I think this would stop rather quickly.
 

Nakosis

Non-Binary Physicalist
Premium Member
If the USA stops propping them up with an unlimited supply of weapons and taxpayer dollars that could better be spent here at home on our own people, I think this would stop rather quickly.

From what I recall, Israel won the 6 day war without the help of anyone. It is because of this victory as much as anything that the US thought it would be good to ally itself with a winner in the Middle East.

Perhaps by eventual attrition, Israel would lose but I imagine a lot would be lost by everyone in the Middle East before that happens.
 

Flankerl

Well-Known Member
If the USA stops propping them up with an unlimited supply of weapons and taxpayer dollars that could better be spent here at home on our own people, I think this would stop rather quickly.
Oh yes it would stop rather quickly.
Israel would have to use less precise weaponry and thus rely on area bombardments with basic artillery and even planes.

At the same time without proper defences for Israeli civilians the Government would have to strike back even harder as Israeli civilians would die due to continued rocket fire by Hamas, PIJ and Hezbollah.


At the end the people you supposedly are in favour of would be far worse off.
 

Lyndon

"Peace is the answer" quote: GOD, 2014
Premium Member
Oh yes it would stop rather quickly.
Israel would have to use less precise weaponry and thus rely on area bombardments with basic artillery and even planes.

At the same time without proper defences for Israeli civilians the Government would have to strike back even harder as Israeli civilians would die due to continued rocket fire by Hamas, PIJ and Hezbollah.


At the end the people you supposedly are in favour of would be far worse off.
So what you are saying is Israel cannot control itself when it comes to killing their neighbors, so better to give them more precise weapons???
 

InChrist

Free4ever
Why should people give up their lands
merely because outsiders decreed it so?
It is a hideous travesty that what belongs
to Muslims must be stolen from them
because Jews want it for their own.
I think you are wrong and don’t know the history, other than the revisionist version…


“After the Bar Kokhba revolt suppression, a large Jewish settlement remained in the Land of Israel for the next 600 years, throughout the first centuries of the Christian Byzantine period.

The Holy Land was largely emptied of Jews only after the Arab conquest in the 7th century C.E. The Arabs dispossessed the Jews of their farmland, leaving most of them with no choice but to leave. Despite this, the Jews maintained a continual presence in the four cities of Jerusalem, Hebron, Tiberias, and Safed.

Throughout the Ottoman period in the Land of Israel, from 1517 to 1917 C.E., the land was an insignificant part of the Ottoman Empire. It was not even an Ottoman province in its own right, but only a part of the province of Syria. All the historical records of Europeans and Americans who visited the Holy Land during the Ottoman Empire period depicted an empty and abandoned land.

In the mid-19th century, for example, Mark Twain visited the Land of Israel. Twain described it as a "hopeless, dreary, heartbroken land."

“The land began to develop again only with the start of the Jewish settlements after the establishment of the Zionist movement, initiating waves of Jewish immigration to the Holy Land.

Significant development came only after the conquest of the land by the British Empire in 1917. This period is when many Arabs from neighboring countries made their way into the Land of Israel as migrant workers. Interestingly, the most popular surnames in the Palestinian Authority and Gaza Strip today include "Hijazi" (a region in Saudi Arabia), "Al-Masri" (which means Egyptian in Arabic), and "Halabi" (which is the city of Aleppo in Syria in Arabic). Other examples abound.

Before the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, the only people who called themselves "Palestinians" were the Jews. Many Zionist and Jewish organizations in Israel even incorporated the name Palestine into their names, such as the Zionist Jewish newspaper Palestine Post, which is now known as The Jerusalem Post.”



“Prior to 1948 with the creation of the State of Israel and its war with several invading Arab armies, all attempts by Jews to come back to their homeland were always by peaceful means, unlike almost all colonial movements. Lands were purchased often at exorbitant prices from the local population. Interestingly, Arab leaders in Palestine were generally the ones who sold land to the Jewish settlers.”

“The Zionists returning to Israel did not come to replace native indigenous populations. They themselves were the real natives and the indigenous population of the land of Israel. Let us bury once and for all the slanderous charges against the State of Israel as representing the colonial part of the phrase “settler colonialism”.

 

Spice

StewardshipPeaceIntergityCommunityEquality
Negotiate with Hamas & others peace in exchange
It's on the table and now the UN should force a deal, IMO:
 

Flankerl

Well-Known Member
It's on the table and now the UN should force a deal, IMO:
Ah so hudna.

What could possibly go wrong.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I think you are wrong and don’t know the history, other than the revisionist version…


“After the Bar Kokhba revolt suppression, a large Jewish settlement remained in the Land of Israel for the next 600 years, throughout the first centuries of the Christian Byzantine period.

The Holy Land was largely emptied of Jews only after the Arab conquest in the 7th century C.E. The Arabs dispossessed the Jews of their farmland, leaving most of them with no choice but to leave. Despite this, the Jews maintained a continual presence in the four cities of Jerusalem, Hebron, Tiberias, and Safed.

Throughout the Ottoman period in the Land of Israel, from 1517 to 1917 C.E., the land was an insignificant part of the Ottoman Empire. It was not even an Ottoman province in its own right, but only a part of the province of Syria. All the historical records of Europeans and Americans who visited the Holy Land during the Ottoman Empire period depicted an empty and abandoned land.

In the mid-19th century, for example, Mark Twain visited the Land of Israel. Twain described it as a "hopeless, dreary, heartbroken land."

“The land began to develop again only with the start of the Jewish settlements after the establishment of the Zionist movement, initiating waves of Jewish immigration to the Holy Land.

Significant development came only after the conquest of the land by the British Empire in 1917. This period is when many Arabs from neighboring countries made their way into the Land of Israel as migrant workers. Interestingly, the most popular surnames in the Palestinian Authority and Gaza Strip today include "Hijazi" (a region in Saudi Arabia), "Al-Masri" (which means Egyptian in Arabic), and "Halabi" (which is the city of Aleppo in Syria in Arabic). Other examples abound.

Before the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, the only people who called themselves "Palestinians" were the Jews. Many Zionist and Jewish organizations in Israel even incorporated the name Palestine into their names, such as the Zionist Jewish newspaper Palestine Post, which is now known as The Jerusalem Post.”



“Prior to 1948 with the creation of the State of Israel and its war with several invading Arab armies, all attempts by Jews to come back to their homeland were always by peaceful means, unlike almost all colonial movements. Lands were purchased often at exorbitant prices from the local population. Interestingly, Arab leaders in Palestine were generally the ones who sold land to the Jewish settlers.”

“The Zionists returning to Israel did not come to replace native indigenous populations. They themselves were the real natives and the indigenous population of the land of Israel. Let us bury once and for all the slanderous charges against the State of Israel as representing the colonial part of the phrase “settler colonialism”.

IMO, that post utterly ignores significant realities.
But so it goes when religious orientation can drive
a perspective.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
It's on the table and now the UN should force a deal, IMO:
I fully expect it to fail, now that tempers have
flared so badly on both sides, especially Israel.
 

Flankerl

Well-Known Member
Plenty -- but what could go RIGHT if a solution blooms from this offer?
Ah I see you don't know what hudna is.

Typical westerner.


Fortunately England took that chance and the Troubles came to an end.
I must've missed the part where the IRA wanted to kill all English people and conquer the entire British Isles.
Oh and hold selected English people as convenient slaves.
Rookie mistake of me.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
I must've missed the part where the IRA wanted to kill all English people and conquer the entire British Isles.
Oh and hold selected English people as convenient slaves.
Rookie mistake of me.
The mistake is not wanting to address the point.
 
Top