Jonathan27
Member
Such a benefit is slim at best.Some of us will benefit by knowledgeable and reasoned rebuttal, however.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Such a benefit is slim at best.Some of us will benefit by knowledgeable and reasoned rebuttal, however.
For those who do not believe in Jesus or God, what about them? Not everyone will become christians
No society is obligated to provide education for anyone, beyond pragmatic reasons. Kamala Harris is educated but cannot perform any useful leadership. Her education has only trained her to be reactive to circumstances and to the words of people, and has left her bereft of any wisdom for identifying and attaining principle.
She most likely will resort to a more solitary and domestic life.
How do you think God will look at you the day you stand in front of God?What there will be about them will come to place when they stand before God who created them, and revealed Himself to them during life.
Regards.
Sorry, the Bible is a book of stories that some humans assign meaning to. It has no known authority or power of its own. Put a Bible on a table and all it manages to do is collect dust.The Bible needs no confirmation. It stands above human opinion.
Good, then no other peer of yours does either, including all members of the Taliban. Their attitudes of women are their own, and illustrate their own weaknesses as fallible mortals. Strong men are capable of accepting women as equal.I have no authority over any woman.
I'm not sure what you think that means, explain in clear language.My daughter is an adult, my wife has become perfected with Jesus Christ.
Then you're describing religious women as weak, and non-believers are strong given they don't need to seek religious dogma to prop themselves up. So perhaps it's religious women you don't respect.Amy woman who wants to have security, identity, and self worth can come to God through rebirth in Jesus Christ.
Are you genderless? If not then you are constrained as well, yes? I'm not sure what purpose your comment is here except to disparage women.However, until she physically dies, she will live within the constraints of her gender, even if she pursued a transgender.
Gods aren't known to exist. Your opinion has no authority over those who aren't convinced. What now? More claims?What there will be about them will come to place when they stand before God who created them, and revealed Himself to them during life.
Regards.
Women bring themselves up, these days. But to what end, is the issue. Another failed form of short sighted Feminism?So your objection isn’t towards women being educated; but rather whether society has an obligation to educate people?
Why bring up women at all, then?
What does this mean? I think it is the duty of society to provide a basic education to its citizens regardless of gender.No society is obligated to provide education for anyone, beyond pragmatic reasons.
Can you be a little less opaque? It comes off as evasive.Kamala Harris is educated but cannot perform any useful leadership. Her education has only trained her to be reactive to circumstances and to the words of people, and has left her bereft of any wisdom for identifying and attaining principle.
She most likely will resort to a more solitary and domestic life.
I have no desire to disparage women, in the same way there is no need to disparage children for being children. Children are recognized for what they are, and then hopefully accommodated by principle.Sorry, the Bible is a book of stories that some humans assign meaning to. It has no known authority or power of its own. Put a Bible on a table and all it manages to do is collect dust.
Good, then no other peer of yours does either, including all members of the Taliban. Their attitudes of women are their own, and illustrate their own weaknesses as fallible mortals. Strong men are capable of accepting women as equal.
I'm not sure what you think that means, explain in clear language.
Then you're describing religious women as weak, and non-believers are strong given they don't need to seek religious dogma to prop themselves up. So perhaps it's religious women you don't respect.
Are you genderless? If not then you are constrained as well, yes? I'm not sure what purpose your comment is here except to disparage women.
There is no doubt many people deny God. Are you ready to meet Him?Gods aren't known to exist. Your opinion has no authority over those who aren't convinced. What now? More claims?
That's the dilemma for immoral believers. Frankly if they took religious books seriously and feared their God they would be bending over backwards to be kind, decent, respectful, moral, helpful, etc. When we see extremists it's as if they believe they are gods themselves and lack all the humility that is the cornerstone of morality.How do you think God will look at you the day you stand in front of God?
Women bring themselves up, these days. But to what end, is the issue. Another failed form of short sighted Feminism?
Yet you are doing it. So are you confessing to a lack of self-awareness of your subconscious motives? Religious people would call this the influence of Satan. Is it possible you are mistaken in your beliefs?I have no desire to disparage women, in the same way there is no need to disparage children for being children. Children are recognized for what they are, and then hopefully accommodated by principle.
Do you see the quest for equality as a short-sighted failure? Whose failure? Is it wrong that women want to be viewed based on the merit of their intellect and talent and not just as objects of the interest of men?Women bring themselves up, these days. But to what end, is the issue. Another failed form of short sighted Feminism?
The end is for women to achieve what they are capable of, and to be a thorn in the sides of insecure men.Women bring themselves up, these days. But to what end, is the issue. Another failed form of short sighted Feminism?
What????The languages of both soft and hard science can fill only so much gappage, and then only as they are dependant upon greater realities. When one sits on a chair, there needs to be a functional confidence.
Thanks for your offer.
It is Bewitched and I Dream of Jeannie. In both those old shows, the men had these extraordinary and mega-talented women in their lives that they loved but wanted to keep contained at the same time. Some guys can't take the competition and want women to keep it all bottled up, unless the man needs something.The end is for women to achieve what they are capable of, and to be a thorn in the sides of insecure men.
It was something I read a long time ago. Too long ago to remember more than the bottom line.What you're describing is mentioned by Hyde in one of the two Hyde papers, I forget which. Which isn't surprising, those are pretty large meta-studies, so this was undoubtedly noticed by at least some of the sub-studies.
Now you are comparing women to children? At least it is a step up from your previous comparison of them with dogs.I have no desire to disparage women, in the same way there is no need to disparage children for being children. Children are recognized for what they are, and then hopefully accommodated by principle.