• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

It May Be The Taliban Has This Right.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Meow Mix

Chatte Féministe
No society is obligated to provide education for anyone, beyond pragmatic reasons. Kamala Harris is educated but cannot perform any useful leadership. Her education has only trained her to be reactive to circumstances and to the words of people, and has left her bereft of any wisdom for identifying and attaining principle.

She most likely will resort to a more solitary and domestic life.

So your objection isn’t towards women being educated; but rather whether society has an obligation to educate people?

Why bring up women at all, then?
 
What there will be about them will come to place when they stand before God who created them, and revealed Himself to them during life.

Regards.
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
The Bible needs no confirmation. It stands above human opinion.
Sorry, the Bible is a book of stories that some humans assign meaning to. It has no known authority or power of its own. Put a Bible on a table and all it manages to do is collect dust.

I have no authority over any woman.
Good, then no other peer of yours does either, including all members of the Taliban. Their attitudes of women are their own, and illustrate their own weaknesses as fallible mortals. Strong men are capable of accepting women as equal.

My daughter is an adult, my wife has become perfected with Jesus Christ.
I'm not sure what you think that means, explain in clear language.

Amy woman who wants to have security, identity, and self worth can come to God through rebirth in Jesus Christ.
Then you're describing religious women as weak, and non-believers are strong given they don't need to seek religious dogma to prop themselves up. So perhaps it's religious women you don't respect.

However, until she physically dies, she will live within the constraints of her gender, even if she pursued a transgender.
Are you genderless? If not then you are constrained as well, yes? I'm not sure what purpose your comment is here except to disparage women.
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
What there will be about them will come to place when they stand before God who created them, and revealed Himself to them during life.

Regards.
Gods aren't known to exist. Your opinion has no authority over those who aren't convinced. What now? More claims?
 
So your objection isn’t towards women being educated; but rather whether society has an obligation to educate people?

Why bring up women at all, then?
Women bring themselves up, these days. But to what end, is the issue. Another failed form of short sighted Feminism?
 

Dan From Smithville

He who controls the spice controls the universe.
Staff member
Premium Member
No society is obligated to provide education for anyone, beyond pragmatic reasons.
What does this mean? I think it is the duty of society to provide a basic education to its citizens regardless of gender.

Kamala Harris is educated but cannot perform any useful leadership. Her education has only trained her to be reactive to circumstances and to the words of people, and has left her bereft of any wisdom for identifying and attaining principle.

She most likely will resort to a more solitary and domestic life.
Can you be a little less opaque? It comes off as evasive.

What is useful leadership in your opinion? What does identifying and attaining principle mean?
 
Last edited:
Sorry, the Bible is a book of stories that some humans assign meaning to. It has no known authority or power of its own. Put a Bible on a table and all it manages to do is collect dust.


Good, then no other peer of yours does either, including all members of the Taliban. Their attitudes of women are their own, and illustrate their own weaknesses as fallible mortals. Strong men are capable of accepting women as equal.


I'm not sure what you think that means, explain in clear language.


Then you're describing religious women as weak, and non-believers are strong given they don't need to seek religious dogma to prop themselves up. So perhaps it's religious women you don't respect.


Are you genderless? If not then you are constrained as well, yes? I'm not sure what purpose your comment is here except to disparage women.
I have no desire to disparage women, in the same way there is no need to disparage children for being children. Children are recognized for what they are, and then hopefully accommodated by principle.
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
How do you think God will look at you the day you stand in front of God?
That's the dilemma for immoral believers. Frankly if they took religious books seriously and feared their God they would be bending over backwards to be kind, decent, respectful, moral, helpful, etc. When we see extremists it's as if they believe they are gods themselves and lack all the humility that is the cornerstone of morality.
 

Meow Mix

Chatte Féministe
Women bring themselves up, these days. But to what end, is the issue. Another failed form of short sighted Feminism?

Tu mets la charrue avant le bœuf. You’re the one that brought up women in this thread; it should be no surprise that women might come here to split hairs.

To what end? I pursue my education to understand the universe.
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
I have no desire to disparage women, in the same way there is no need to disparage children for being children. Children are recognized for what they are, and then hopefully accommodated by principle.
Yet you are doing it. So are you confessing to a lack of self-awareness of your subconscious motives? Religious people would call this the influence of Satan. Is it possible you are mistaken in your beliefs?
 

Dan From Smithville

He who controls the spice controls the universe.
Staff member
Premium Member
Women bring themselves up, these days. But to what end, is the issue. Another failed form of short sighted Feminism?
Do you see the quest for equality as a short-sighted failure? Whose failure? Is it wrong that women want to be viewed based on the merit of their intellect and talent and not just as objects of the interest of men?
 

Dan From Smithville

He who controls the spice controls the universe.
Staff member
Premium Member
The end is for women to achieve what they are capable of, and to be a thorn in the sides of insecure men.
It is Bewitched and I Dream of Jeannie. In both those old shows, the men had these extraordinary and mega-talented women in their lives that they loved but wanted to keep contained at the same time. Some guys can't take the competition and want women to keep it all bottled up, unless the man needs something.
 
Last edited:

Dan From Smithville

He who controls the spice controls the universe.
Staff member
Premium Member
What you're describing is mentioned by Hyde in one of the two Hyde papers, I forget which. Which isn't surprising, those are pretty large meta-studies, so this was undoubtedly noticed by at least some of the sub-studies.
It was something I read a long time ago. Too long ago to remember more than the bottom line.
 

Dan From Smithville

He who controls the spice controls the universe.
Staff member
Premium Member
I have no desire to disparage women, in the same way there is no need to disparage children for being children. Children are recognized for what they are, and then hopefully accommodated by principle.
Now you are comparing women to children? At least it is a step up from your previous comparison of them with dogs.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top