I believe Congress might have the last say. Which is it. The evidence was not strong enough or Barr is just not going to charge the guy that gave him the job. You are all over the place.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It's true; fake news is a problem.
- Thread starter Father Heathen
- Start date
I listed 2 articles. Nothing adhominem about it. You're just ignoring it.
You do know that there is a difference between information gathering and entrapment right. Of course you do. You believe you are an expert at all things. Certainly that includes the law. What was I thinking.
You can post a smiley face for that one. It was hysterical.
No, Congress does not. Congress makes laws, not enforces them. Barr and the DoJ (the Judicial branch) actually enforce the laws.
I did not ignore those links, though dumping links is really not answering questions. Those links were about agents sent to gather information and report no activity involving entrapment. A claim, if you recall was central to my question.
So evasion remains your friend.
Yes, and what is Congress trying to do now with that information?
Ooops someone got caught with their hand in the cookie jar.
They better get you on the cabinet then. You have it all sorted out. Of course, why do people keep mentioning Congress regarding this? It must be fake news.
Answered in #86.
Because they don't understand the law.
You have a partisan penchant for making something into something else. Based on what I have seen you tend to declare victory by attrition rather than having the more reasoned position. I bet you will just keep responding no matter what I post. Just to be contrary.
You better set them straight.
Non-responsive.
I thought attorneys understood the law, but then you also claim they do not understand the law. Which is it dude?
Attorneys will say whatever you pay them to say. At least Barr is backed by the Mueller report and the DoJ.
So Barr is an attorney and you say attorneys will say whatever you pay them to say. You may be onto something there. I agree with your conclusion that he is saying what he is paid to say.
Except the Mueller report outlines instances of obstruction. Are you sure you read it?
Oh that is right. An attorney was paid to summarize it and as you declare, they say what they are paid to say.
Bob the Unbeliever
Well-Known Member
Your hate is literally palpable. Ironic, considering that Jesus was quite the liberal, if the bible has any value describing his worldview.
Ironic, don'cha think? You hating liberals like this? I wonder what the very Liberal Jew would have to say about your hate?
About your selfishness? About your support of a man who's ONLY goal, is to make the top 1% even richer?
What did Jesus have to say about Riches, again?
Yeah.... hypocrisy is strong, here.
Bob the Unbeliever
Well-Known Member
And who fought against freeing the slaves? That's right: Christians. Good, Bible-Believing Christians--- who correctly pointed to the bible you don't seem familiar with, to "Justify" keeping slaves.
Barr is backed by our system of checks and balances. I am inclined to believe him over a Dem shill.
I've read it.
What you see as obstruction is not actually obstruction.
As Barr explained in his testimony. So until you can refutiate what Barr says you have no real ground to stand on as far as this is concerned your circular logic has run its course.
Last edited:
Boo hoo hoo