Manipulated
Pilgrim
Well when you find it you will know, until then, try to relax.What is even more frightening is people who think they know the truth.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Well when you find it you will know, until then, try to relax.What is even more frightening is people who think they know the truth.
I learnt nothing from Christ sacrificing himself.
"And when he was twelve years old, they went up to Jerusalem after the custom of the feast. And when they had fulfilled the days, as they returned, the child Jesus tarried behind in Jerusalem; and Joseph and his mother knew not of it. But they, supposing him to have been in the company, went a day's journey; and they sought him among their kinsfolk and acquaintance. And when they found him not, they turned back again to Jerusalem, seeking him. And it came to pass, that after three days they found him in the temple, sitting in the midst of the doctors, both hearing them, and asking them questions. And all that heard him were astonished at his understanding and answers."
Not so obvious to me. I've heard the arguments about how it might have been "borrowed" from elsewhere, but they are generally pretty flimsy.This story is an obvious fabrication.
Hey Memnock,
You cannot even see the kingdom of God unless you are born again. God is not theology, that's the doctrines of man concerning His Word. And the true God, and eternal life is Jesus Christ, and if you believe God's Word He will show you how to live in God's unlimited grace. It's fascinating to me that reading the book on Calculus does not teach everyone immediately how to perform it, but in a year of study you can come close to teaching the class if you are diligent in your studies.
The issue isn't whether it's true, since you likely don't think any of the stories about Jesus were true anyway. The issue is your quoting Bertrand Russell saying that the gospel doesn't praise intelligence. The story clearly shows otherwise. Trying to shift the focus to whether it's true or not is intellectually dishonest.This story is an obvious fabrication.
He did both. He lived his life as an example of how we should live. And that got him in trouble with the authorities, which got him killed.
I don't believe that Jesus died as a sacrifice for our sins. He died the way that Gandhi and King died. They did not choose to die, but they chose to live for justice and love, full well knowing that it might cause their deaths. In that respect, they died for us.
No, I'm not Christian, but I know many Christians who would say the same thing. It was Jesus' message and example - ie, his life - that was/is salvific, not his death. If he had lived and taught to a ripe old age, as the Buddha did, and was not crucified, he would still be the Christ.
That's one interpretation. You believe what you believe, and I'll believe what I believe.The OT describes the atoning process that Jesus fulfilled. It may sound morbid to some, but with out this atonement, we would still be in sin.
What is free in the universe,nothing, everything is paid for or bartered for. something is exchanged for another, science is proof of that. Nothing escapes the system of universal laws, not even God. No doubt God is a chess player and he will sacrifice to win the game.
That's one interpretation. You believe what you believe, and I'll believe what I believe.
Why did jesus die for our sins?? If he was God couldn't he just forgive us??? It all seems abit...Confusing to me!!!Well, i know he died for our sins, and i have not read the bible.
Why did jesus die for our sins?? If he was God couldn't he just forgive us??? It all seems abit...Confusing to me!!!
You lost the bet.A combination of scriptural citing and circular logic, I wager.
The issue isn't whether it's true, since you likely don't think any of the stories about Jesus were true anyway. The issue is your quoting Bertrand Russell saying that the gospel doesn't praise intelligence. The story clearly shows otherwise. Trying to shift the focus to whether it's true or not is intellectually dishonest.
Read the Bible some more and you will get better answers that you are getting on this thread.Well, i know he died for our sins, and i have not read the bible.
Weak. Why don't you just admit that you were wrong on this point?You're confusing intelligence with wisdom - 2 different things, another reason why this story is an obvious fabrication.
The issue isn't whether it's true, since you likely don't think any of the stories about Jesus were true anyway. The issue is your quoting Bertrand Russell saying that the gospel doesn't praise intelligence. The story clearly shows otherwise. Trying to shift the focus to whether it's true or not is intellectually dishonest.