tumbleweed41
Resident Liberal Hippie
Welcome to Salem Massachusetts, circa 1692.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That's because it's not
I could say the same. Yet you say this man should die anyways.
All the time. But I have been a precautionary of 'Magic(k)' for about 7 years now and highly doubt I am wrong in this one(whether or not what this man did was magic, and whether magic is real or not doesn't matter).
What about you, do you ever consider that your perceptive might be wrong?
What Kerr says right here.
And the proof that sorcery exists would be...
The man was not Saudi Arabian, he was simply making pilgrimage. He did not commit said sin or crime on Saudi soil therefore, should not be prosecuted and given the death sentence. How would you feel if the US started executing Muslims because Islam takes people away from the path of Christianity?
I'm sorry there is no justification in the world to support the Saudis' decision here. The death penalty is abhorrent normally. To use it because someone thinks the other isn't practicing religion properly is wrong. And how insecure do you have to be to think some t.v. show is going to destroy the Islamic religion in the hearts of its viewers? Freedom of belief and thought should be a fundamental human right.
I'm confused. A great many people here have stated that there is no such thing as sorcery, which would mean that what he did was not sorcery and therefor he cannot be punished for it.no one is arguing about sorcery existing or being real.
When I said I am against death penalty, I mean death penalty. It was not a comment on anything else, but since you asked, I tend to be against killing people unless it is in self defense or the direct defense of another. Death penalty does not qualify.but are you against the killing fo anything, big or small?
I'm confused. A great many people here have stated that there is no such thing as sorcery, which would mean that what he did was not sorcery and therefor he cannot be punished for it.
Either you are saying that you accept sorcery as existing only in fantasy, and want this guy to die for doing something that looks kind of like it, or you think we all believe in magic.
It is as right or wrong as converting people to Islam.it leads people to disbelief therefore it is wrong.
So under your system Harry Houdini (a famous Hungarian escape artist and magician, if you haven't heard of him) would be sentenced to death, because he makes it look like he does impossible things?look, sorcery is about deceiving people into thinking that you can do something humanly impossible, like telling the future for example. if this man is doing that (telling people the "future") he might get a fluke, someone might believe that he can really tell the future, that puts people off from islam. and considering that the person who is doing this is a muslim, he is to be punished with islamic law and he, nor his muslim family should be against his punishment due to being a muslim means accepting the laws and teachings of islam. and a muslim must also not lie.
is that any clear? it is not about sorcer existing or not, it is about what it leads to which according to the islamic perspective and teachings, it leads to disbelief.
TV presenter gets death sentence for 'sorcery' - CNN.com
It's rather embarrassing that such a culture still exists in the modern world.
it leads people to disbelief therefore it is wrong.
Who was fooled? It's taken as a given these days that television and stage "magic" isn't real; it's spectacle for entertainment. Nobody with half a brain would've been fooled into thinking he was actually engaging in sorcery. What's next? Executing actors for "lying"?that is the point, don't fool people into thinking you ca make the impossible possible.
Doing something as ludicrous and evil as killing a man for pretending to predict the future on a TV show sure leads me away from these people's god. Does this mean we can conclude that they're not "doing things through god"?well a person who is doing things through god would not lead people astray from god.
I want you to remember what you said here in red.what is this modern world that you speak of?
sorcery, especially "predicting the future and giving people advice" is punishable with death in islam and if this man was a muslim he would know that by doing such a thing he is infact making himself equal to Allah (swt). Allah has no partners.
threads like this one and comments like yours are very telling just how modern you "modern people" are. i thought modern people were against ignorance, yet here we are.
Hmmm, would almost make one think that he wasn't actually able to predict the future, because if he could, he most likely wouldn't go somewhere he knew he would be taken and executed. Hmmm, I guess that would mean he wasn't actually practicing sorcery huh?it is ironic how he was giving futuristic advice to his audience and failed to give advice to himself not to engage in sorcery and not to make Umrah.
what a pathetic idiot.
But, I thought you were just supporting his sentence of execution because that's what sorcery calls for weren't you? You were calling other people ignorant for not seeing that this was "right" within Islam. yet here you are admitting that he wsn't practicing sorcery, he was lying, and Islam "discourages" lying. Do they "discourage" by executing? Does Islam call for the death penalty for lying?right he was lying about actually seeing the future. islam discourages lying and idle talk that has nothing to do with anything. his lying could some how by chance worked out for someone and there goes a believer becoming a disbeliever by believeing him. which infact we are back to what i said, he is making himself equal to Allah most high.
To the first part: Then why aren't these wonderful "religious police" out arresting people in other countries? If Islam has no borders then why do the "religious police" have borders?the laws of islam do not have borders. if you are a muslim and live anywhere in the world the same law applies to all. there is not pat in the shoulder if you are rich or the president.
he should not have even started sorcey in the first place. what you are suggesting is that i kill you then i repent afterwards. i should have thought about it first and then not have killed you. everyone regrets killing another person, who would want to spend his life in prison?
Hmm, sounds flimsy to me. If it's policy to execute people who do things which lead to disbelief in Islam then I guess executing people of all religions besides Islam is the right thing to do. Wait, isn't that what terrorists seem to want to do? Doesn't seem like a far reach from your mindset to that of a terrorist's.it leads people to disbelief therefore it is wrong.
What if, because of attitudes like yours, he decided he no longer wanted to be a Muslim?the laws of islam do not have borders. if you are a muslim and live anywhere in the world the same law applies to all. there is not pat in the shoulder if you are rich or the president.
Then he is guilty of apostasy and subject to the death penalty.:run:What if, because of attitudes like yours, he decided he no longer wanted to be a Muslim?
THAT'S a real recipe for world peace, alright. In that case, God bless the United States Marine Corps.eselam said:the laws of islam do not have borders.
the laws of islam are not limmited to soil and water. if a muslim anywhere in the world commits a crime he has to be punished with the laws of islam, the laws that one accepts
THAT'S a real recipe for world peace, alright. In that case, God bless the United States Marine Corps.
You can get away with it with defenseless Lebanon, but try executing a U.S. citizen, see what happens.