Mass Assault in Cologne, Mayor blames female victims ?!

[Debater Slayer]

Its under investigation. If you know what that means. No idea if this concept exists where you live.




So you want to see ripped underwear and bleeding vaginas? I wonder why the police doesn't show these pictures.




Standing and some on the ground. All quite easy to understand if you don't smell a conspiracy behind every corner.

I find it quite facepalm-worthy that some people so readily accept conspiracy theories about "da Jewz" while dismissing factual reports from authorities just because they don't agree with their preconceived notions and biases. Selective "skepticism" is quite sad.

 

[FearGod]

This sentiment is coming from somebody who thinks the mayor was just giving sensible advice.

Pay attention, folks. Because this message directed at 4Con as insulting, patronizing, and sexist as it is...is the underlying message of "rape prevention advice" women hear, including female survivors of rape.

Basically, if you're at all attractive, expect men to attack you. Be responsible and avoid men from attacking you.

And people think *I* am the man-hater in these conversations...

Should i always repeat as of how i made my assumption and hence my statement,
here it's once again.

90% of women 'sexually harassed in the workplace'

Nine in ten women have suffered some form of sexual discrimination in the workplace, a study has found.

A vast majority of women workers have experienced ‘gender harassment’, which includes offensive sexist remarks or being told that they could not do their job properly due to their sex.

This more common, low-level sexist behaviour was just as damaging and distressing as overt advances, experts suggest.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...exually-harassed-workplace.html#ixzz3yTR1PGCb
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

[MysticSang'ha]

Should i always repeat as of how i made my assumption and hence my statement,
here it's once again.

90% of women 'sexually harassed in the workplace'

Nine in ten women have suffered some form of sexual discrimination in the workplace, a study has found.

A vast majority of women workers have experienced ‘gender harassment’, which includes offensive sexist remarks or being told that they could not do their job properly due to their sex.

This more common, low-level sexist behaviour was just as damaging and distressing as overt advances, experts suggest.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...exually-harassed-workplace.html#ixzz3yTR1PGCb
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Therefore...?

 

[Debater Slayer]

Should i always repeat as of how i made my assumption and hence my statement,
here it's once again.

90% of women 'sexually harassed in the workplace'

Nine in ten women have suffered some form of sexual discrimination in the workplace, a study has found.

A vast majority of women workers have experienced ‘gender harassment’, which includes offensive sexist remarks or being told that they could not do their job properly due to their sex.

This more common, low-level sexist behaviour was just as damaging and distressing as overt advances, experts suggest.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...exually-harassed-workplace.html#ixzz3yTR1PGCb
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Lowlifes and criminals are loud. What does this mean? It means that one rapist or sex offender can harass or attack multiple women, so when a report says that 90% of women have experienced sexual harassment or assault, it doesn't mean that most men are rapists or sex offenders; it means that the lowlifes are out in full force.

 

[FearGod]

Its under investigation. If you know what that means. No idea if this concept exists where you live.

If under investigation then why accusing without any evidences yet?

So you want to see ripped underwear and bleeding vaginas? I wonder why the police doesn't show these pictures.

I wonder where were the people while the women were undressed and raped.

Standing and some on the ground. All quite easy to understand if you don't smell a conspiracy behind every corner.

Standing and on the ground within the crowd.

 

[FearGod]

Lowlifes and criminals are loud. What does this mean? It means that one rapist or sex offender can harass or attack multiple women, so when a report says that 90% of women have experienced sexual harassment or assault, it doesn't mean that most men are rapists or sex offenders; it means that the lowlifes are out in full force.

Did i say all men were rapists?
The report says 90% of women were harassed.

 

[Debater Slayer]

Did i say all men were rapists?
The report says 90% of women were harassed.

You implied that being "pretty enough" provoked sexual harassment or assault. Here, again:

Yes you were lucky that all the men around you were Angels assuming that you're pretty enough.

Now I'm wondering if any of the people who accused staunch feminists of being "man-haters" will have the nerve to call out the above rape apologetics as the misandrist and misogynistic venom that it is.

 

[MysticSang'ha]

You implied that being "pretty enough" provoked sexual harassment or assault. Here, again:



Now I'm wondering if any of the people who accused staunch feminists of being "man-haters" will have the nerve to call out the above rape apologetics as the misandrist and misogynistic venom that it is.

They won't. They'd rather approach statements like that with kid-gloves and use their hostility to harshly call us out on our tone because survivor advocates are much easier and more convenient targets in these debates.

Seen it happen for decades. Bad habits are hard to break.

 

[Rival]

Here are some horrible Christian ethics that this thread keeps reminding me of:

"In the same way, husbands must love their wives as they love their own bodies; for a man to love his wife is for him to love himself. A man never hates his own body, but he feeds it and looks after it; and that is the way Christ treats the Church, because we are parts of His body."

"Among you there must not even be mention of sexual vice, or impurity in any of its forms; this would scarcely become the holy people of God!"

"But the body is not for sexual immorality; it is for the Lord, and the Lord is for the body."

These are all taken from Paul's letters.

And even though I'm not a Christian, @FearGod, the religion that pre-dates your own by 600 years disagrees with you. Men are not even to look upon a woman with lust, let alone have the right to attack her for being dressed in a certain fashion.

 

[Revoltingest]

Here are some horrible Christian ethics that this thread keeps reminding me of:

"In the same way, husbands must love their wives as they love their own bodies; for a man to love his wife is for him to love himself. A man never hates his own body, but he feeds it and looks after it; and that is the way Christ treats the Church, because we are parts of His body."

"Among you there must not even be mention of sexual vice, or impurity in any of its forms; this would scarcely become the holy people of God!"

"But the body is not for sexual immorality; it is for the Lord, and the Lord is for the body."

These are all taken from Paul's letters.

And even though I'm not a Christian, @FearGod, the religion that pre-dates your own by 600 years disagrees with you. Men are not even to look upon a woman with lust, let alone have the right to attack her for being dressed in a certain fashion.

You are embarrassing yourself. I'm disgusted by you.

So, FearGod, if thine eye offend thee...

Pluck it out!

Let's keep it about the posts, & less about the poster.

 

[Debater Slayer]

Let's keep it about the posts, & less about the poster.

About that, did you denounce the disgusting post about being "pretty enough" to be sexually harassed or raped?

 

[Rival]

Let's keep it about the posts, & less about the poster.

Someone had to say it.

FearGod, what kind of evidence are you looking for?

 

[Revoltingest]

About that, did you denounce the disgusting post about being "pretty enough" to be sexually harassed or raped?

Now, now.....let's not invent faults for me as justification for breaking the rules.
(Btw, 4con handled that comment perfectly....with restrained outrage, civility,
& addressing the post. What was left to say?)

 

[Debater Slayer]

Now, now.....let's not invent faults for me as justification for breaking the rules.
(Btw, 4con handled that comment perfectly....with restrained outrage, civility,
& addressing the post. What was left to say?)

That's a mere distraction from my question.

Did you denounce that post like you do when you police other members' tones or not?

 

[FearGod]

Here are some horrible Christian ethics that this thread keeps reminding me of:

"In the same way, husbands must love their wives as they love their own bodies; for a man to love his wife is for him to love himself. A man never hates his own body, but he feeds it and looks after it; and that is the way Christ treats the Church, because we are parts of His body."

"Among you there must not even be mention of sexual vice, or impurity in any of its forms; this would scarcely become the holy people of God!"

"But the body is not for sexual immorality; it is for the Lord, and the Lord is for the body."

These are all taken from Paul's letters.

And even though I'm not a Christian, @FearGod, the religion that pre-dates your own by 600 years disagrees with you. Men are not even to look upon a woman with lust, let alone have the right to attack her for being dressed in a certain fashion.

You are embarrassing yourself. I'm disgusted by you.

So, FearGod, if thine eye offend thee...

Pluck it out!

Where did i say that man should have lust towards women?or to look at her according
to what she wears?Please quote me saying such things.

 

[Revoltingest]

That's a mere distraction from my question.
Did you denounce that post like you do when you police other members' tones or not?

No, your question is a distraction, & attempt to dismiss a call to converse here in the spirit of RF.

 

[Rival]

Where did i say that man should have lust towards women?or to look at her according
to what she wears?Please quote me saying such things.

I'm not even having this conversation with you.

 

[Debater Slayer]

No, your question is a distraction, & attempt to dismiss a call to converse here in the spirit of RF.

I didn't endorse or even say anything about the post that you are opposed to. I can't do that here.

Now, the question again: Did you denounce the post in question or not?

 

[FearGod]

Now, let's be fair.

The whole story is all about the mayor, what a crime she did by making an advice
while the investigation is going on, the situation is bad, women be alert, don't
walk close to men.

Some people just hate the mayor and anything she says is wrong regardless.

 

[Revoltingest]

I didn't endorse or even say anything about the post that you are opposed to. I can't do that here.
Now, the question again: Did you denounce the post in question or not?

I've a question of my own....
Do you intend to distract from a call to honor the spirit & rules
of RF by introducing a veiled personal accusation about me?
Should it be about the issues or the poster?

OK, I had 2 questions, not just one.