Thanda
Well-Known Member
this threat is faced over women potentially not having access to vital health care
What is the vital healthcare that is being threatened?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
this threat is faced over women potentially not having access to vital health care
I think the trouble is you are speaking towards behavior that is per se victim blaming while she is discussing a range a victim blaming, which includes statements that foster per se victim blaming, and imply that the speaker on some level feels the victims of sexual assault has some degree of fault. So, if someone gets on national television and says do x to avoid y, they either believe that those who have not avoided y are guilty of not doing x (except for occasional outliers) or they are encouraging others to think that way. Thus, people refer to these statements as victim blaming, even though they are not the per se victim blaming such as asking a person who was raped what he or she did or might have done to "excite" the attacker.Like I said, I agree - I hope you also agree that bad advice is not victim blaming.
I think the trouble is you are speaking towards behavior that is per se victim blaming while she is discussing a range a victim blaming, which includes statements that foster per se victim blaming, and imply that the speaker on some level feels the victims of sexual assault has some degree of fault. So, if someone gets on national television and says do x to avoid y, they either believe that those who have not avoided y are guilty of not doing x (except for occasional outliers) or they are encouraging others to think that way. Thus, people refer to these statements as victim blaming, even though they are not the per se victim blaming such as asking a person who was raped what he or she did or might have done to "excite" the attacker.
This suggests that there's a great deal of misunderstanding due to incompatible perspectives.Like I said, I agree - I hope you also agree that bad advice is not victim blaming.
I think the trouble is you are speaking towards behavior that is per se victim blaming while she is discussing a range a victim blaming, which includes statements that foster per se victim blaming, and imply that the speaker on some level feels the victims of sexual assault has some degree of fault. So, if someone gets on national television and says do x to avoid y, they either believe that those who have not avoided y are guilty of not doing x (except for occasional outliers) or they are encouraging others to think that way. Thus, people refer to these statements as victim blaming, even though they are not the per se victim blaming such as asking a person who was raped what he or she did or might have done to "excite" the attacker.
Rape is a subset of sexual assault, which can include unwanted touching.Btw, why do Americans call rape "sexual assault"?
Rape is a subset of sexual assault, which can include unwanted touching.
Confusion of the 2 terms does cause some trouble here.I see. I just find it a bit weird because some people use the words as if they are interchangeable.
Confusion of the 2 terms does cause some trouble here.
Cancer screenings, STI screenings, contraception, abortion - pretty much everything that Planned Parenthood does, and even though only a very small percentage of what they do is abortions, conservative Christians tend to be some of the strongest, loudest, and most vocal opponent of PP, and want to see PP shut down regardless of the fact that 97% of what they do is provide invaluable health services to women and men.What is the vital healthcare that is being threatened?
Cancer screenings, STI screenings, contraception, abortion - pretty much everything that Planned Parenthood does, and even though only a very small percentage of what they do is abortions, conservative Christians tend to be some of the strongest, loudest, and most vocal opponent of PP, and want to see PP shut down regardless of the fact that 97% of what they do is provide invaluable health services to women and men.
I don't think we'll find someone who sells cocaine for 3% of their legitimate business.
I feel this point really needs iterated, not only because it's very true, but because my own situation adds a unique perspective. Of course I heard such advice being directed towards women, quiet often, before I embraced myself as trans, but once I embraced myself and started taking steps towards transitioning, the very first time I met a trans-support group the issue came up, and I found myself having the same advice directed towards me. It always does fall back on women. Even as a "guy with lots of female friends," I've never heard any advice of situations, behaviors, or other potential indications to help friends stay out of such bad situations. There is nothing that men are told in regards to handling urges for inappropriate sexual conduct and rape. But women are bombarded with advice about how to not get raped, and it's never anything new, full-proof, or really even that effective given the statistics on rape (especially in regards to the acquaintance aspect that is frequently a factor in rape).The problem here for the defenders or apologists for Reker is not just about rape prevention, because for heavens sake women are already given multitudes of how-not-to-get-raped advice throughout most of our lives.
I feel this point really needs iterated, not only because it's very true, but because my own situation adds a unique perspective. Of course I heard such advice being directed towards women, quiet often, before I embraced myself as trans, but once I embraced myself and started taking steps towards transitioning, the very first time I met a trans-support group the issue came up, and I found myself having the same advice directed towards me. It always does fall back on women. Even as a "guy with lots of female friends," I've never heard any advice of situations, behaviors, or other potential indications to help friends stay out of such bad situations. There is nothing that men are told in regards to handling urges for inappropriate sexual conduct and rape. But women are bombarded with advice about how to not get raped, and it's never anything new, full-proof, or really even that effective given the statistics on rape (especially in regards to the acquaintance aspect that is frequently a factor in rape).
That's a part of it, even though there is not one cent of federal funding that pays for abortions. But the whole thing must burn because of a few abortions, and the edited video certainly didn't help, even though it's known to be heavily and carefully edited.They (I'm not American) say providing money to planned parenthood subsidizes abortions.
That part isn't really a valid comparisson, as the abortions are legal - they just don't do that many of them and they have the overall goal of reducing the need and want for abortions.Kind of like if somebody was running a completely legit business, except for the cocaine they sell on the side. If he says to you, "Hey man, Invest! I won't use your money for the cocaine - I'll keep things separate". I'm guessing most people would still have an issue.
What better advice could the mayor have given?If we imagine a continuum on which advice can range from "bad" to "victim blaming", I'd say that advice that amounts to "in the future, do the impossible", is closer to the victim blaming end of the spectrum.
Always good to make the echo chamber louder, eh?Man... I especially miss @Alceste when I see threads like this one. She helped balance the scales a lot.
Had I been the mayor, I'd have given no advice.What better advice could the mayor have given?
Tom