It is impossible to know that without having new, concrete regulation proposals in front of us.gun regulations would not stopped it.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It is impossible to know that without having new, concrete regulation proposals in front of us.gun regulations would not stopped it.
In my state you can be arrested for just having pepper spray.Even more ridiculous is government's advertising that schools are "gun free",
& prohibiting anyone from being able to defend oneself or others. A handgun
is at a disadvantage against an AR15, but an unarmed worker is even worse off.
Well, it's possible to use it improperly.In my state you can be arrested for just having pepper spray.
It has much to do with freedom.
(I know we're in agreement here, but when you offer something to pounce upon, I'm there.)
I never said he was properly exercising his freedom.Freedom?
That murderer was free to get himself a bunch of guns, are you happy with that kind of freedom?
What? I thought you defended FREEDOM?Well, it's possible to use it improperly.
Therefore no one should be defending him/herself with it, eh.
Competing interests will be balanced.What? I thought you defended FREEDOM?
Yuk yuk yuk....
So you can have freedom, but only as long as it's properly exercised freedom?I never said he was properly exercising his freedom.
But even that has to do with freedom....exercising it, & limitations upon it.
Thus, my pouncement.
I think you're heading off in a direction I didn't intend.So you can have freedom, but only as long as it's properly exercised freedom?
And there are limitations to your freedom?
Well there's loads of folks who think that possession of a fast fire rifle which they don't actually need, apart from dreaming about fighting some freedom fight against goodness only knows who, is NOT a proper exercising of freedom.
Your pounce........ come on....
gun regulations would not stopped it.
I'm waiting for them to make pointy shoes illegal.Well, it's possible to use it improperly.
Therefore no one should be defending him/herself with it, eh.
I think you're heading off in a direction I didn't intend.
In post #48, you brought up many things, & said they'v nothing to do with freedom.
They're all related to freedom in one way or another.
Okey dokey!Let's start with 'simple'...... *chuckles*
You can't have total freedom. US citizens aren't allowed to avoid the laws of gravity without various machines. And you need to fulfill/surpass masses of obstacles to achieve the right to obtain 'em and use 'em.
And so it could be with some guns. It would be nice if folks could own more simple guns without quite so many requirements. Apart from the fact that black powder is great for blasting stuff, if that killer had had a single action muzzle loading six shooter, how many victims do you think he could have hurt? But he had a fast-fire semi-auto rifle which can empty its magazine as fast as he could pull the trigger.
it depends how determined is the crazy, with right amount of $$$ one can get it, no regulation can stop the transaction.Gun regulation stopped that crazy from buying a bunch of military machine guns, or anti-tank bazookas. True?
Gun regulations are a sensible limitation to freedom whilst helping to protect from mass killings, they just need tweeking to close some gaps, and semi-auto limitations would not be bad.
Plus you need mandatory criminal checks, stability checks, home security safe and intruder protection and all-risks gun insurance before licence issue.
You see?, you still got freedom.
I predict that law abiding will be subjected all types f shake downs while criminal still have the guns...It is impossible to know that without having new, concrete regulation proposals in front of us.
Paris Killings Show Rise of Banned French ‘Weapons of War’I predict that law abiding will be subjected all types f shake downs while criminal still have the guns...
Exactly!
Fact: 17 people shot dead in a school in Great Britain in 1996 - Dunblane Massacre.
The Dunblane massacre was a multiple murder-suicide which occurred at Dunblane Primary School in the Scottish city of Dunblane on 13 March 1996. Sixteen children and one adult were killed by Thomas Watt Hamilton, before he committed suicide.
Initially:
The Home Affairs Select Committee concluded in 1996 that a ban on handguns would be "panic legislation" and would do little to prevent a repeat of the Dunblane incident. (sound familiar?)
However:
because the Hungerford massacre also involved a legal gun owner killing with his legally-held guns, public feeling had turned against private gun ownership, allowing a much more restrictive ban on handguns to pass. In response to this debate, two new Firearms Acts were passed, which outlawed private ownership of most handguns in Great Britain.
Since 1996 No Mass Shootings in the UK. No school shootings in the UK.
The lesson is clear for the USA if it needs proof.
I think you're heading off in a direction I didn't intend.
In post #48, you brought up many things, & said they'v nothing to do with freedom.
They're all related to freedom in one way or another.
Regulation ended sales of machine guns, though. It just allowed existing ones to remain in private hands.it depends how determined is the crazy, with right amount of $$$ one can get it, no regulation can stop the transaction.
Okey dokey!