Britedream
Active Member
I do not understand you, you leave the reference, and you come here and ask, what do not you go and read the reference, then you will understand.
Last edited:
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Muhammads knowledge divine or learned?
- Thread starter vskipper
- Start date
Britedream
Active Member
you need outhouse to talk you.
Britedream
Active Member
please look at my post to outouse regarding the matter.
Sleeppy
Fatalist. Christian. Pacifist.
Why does the Quran say that the barrier is not transgressed? The reference states otherwise. You state otherwise as well, when you say "the barrier conditions the water" masses.
Britedream
Active Member
What does the reference say?.
It is the one to be correct, did not you see, I told you this is my understanding, I did not check the reference, so tell me about it, please.
Last edited:
Sleeppy
Fatalist. Christian. Pacifist.
The reference says that the barrier is an area of transgression between water masses.
Britedream
Active Member
What page , name of the author, please.
please give a link to it.
outhouse
Atheistically
Abraham never existed as a real person, yet islam claims he was a real prophet
It claims all the mythology was real.
The exodus factually did not happen as written, yet islam claims it is.
The fanaticism involved is exactly like YEC denouncing evolution. But instead of a minority group its the whole religion as a whole.
Why does not one credible historian in the whole world use islams books for Jewish and Christian history? Because plagiarized books have no credibility at all.
Half of your prophets factually have no historicity.
It claims all the mythology was real.
The exodus factually did not happen as written, yet islam claims it is.
The fanaticism involved is exactly like YEC denouncing evolution. But instead of a minority group its the whole religion as a whole.
Why does not one credible historian in the whole world use islams books for Jewish and Christian history? Because plagiarized books have no credibility at all.
Half of your prophets factually have no historicity.
outhouse
Atheistically
Why does not one credible historian in the whole world use islams books for Jewish and Christian history?
Britedream
Active Member
No my dear, The fact that you do not know what next to me, is not your prove, there is nothing next to me.
Britedream
Active Member
Please ask them, I cant not speak for them, but I can tell you that Quran is not a history book. as I told you before.
Sleeppy
Fatalist. Christian. Pacifist.
Britedream
Active Member
You did not go to the reference. Please see what I Have posted for you.
"The barrier divides the two seas so that each sea has its own temperature, salinity and density. {Principles of Oceanography, Davis, pp. 92-93.}
The barrier conditions the water. (my understanding).
when the water from one sea enters the other sea, it loses its distinctive characteristic and becomes homogenized with the other water"
Do you see the reference?
outhouse
Atheistically
OK so if it is not a history book, then nothing in it is historical, it is all mythology correct?
outhouse
Atheistically
How about something someone could actually understand?
outhouse
Atheistically
Abraham never existed as a real person, yet islam claims he was a real prophet
It claims all the mythology was real.
The exodus factually did not happen as written, yet islam claims it is.
The fanaticism involved is exactly like YEC denouncing evolution. But instead of a minority group its the whole religion as a whole.
Why does not one credible historian in the whole world use islams books for Jewish and Christian history? Because plagiarized books have no credibility at all.
Half of your prophets factually have no historicity.
It claims all the mythology was real.
The exodus factually did not happen as written, yet islam claims it is.
The fanaticism involved is exactly like YEC denouncing evolution. But instead of a minority group its the whole religion as a whole.
Why does not one credible historian in the whole world use islams books for Jewish and Christian history? Because plagiarized books have no credibility at all.
Half of your prophets factually have no historicity.
Britedream
Active Member
It is true, but when you are claiming something, then you must show where did this claim come from.
if you are refering to the gentlemen who asked me, He is introducing new subject, while we did not finish what we are discussing, no point to jump from one point to the other, so I asked him to talk to you.
Last edited:
outhouse
Atheistically
I have.
OK so if it is not a history book, then nothing in it is historical, it is all mythology correct?
Sleeppy
Fatalist. Christian. Pacifist.
That quote is not in that book, 'Principles of Oceanography'. It's inaccurate, which is why I gave you another reference. The barrier is transgressed, as your second paragraph says.