Perhaps because you are not familiar with straight answers and only see what you want to.
No, I have demonstrated my capabilty and willingness to consider both sides, even if it means that I alienate myself from my own family, friends, and community. Here it is again:
This is what I said: "Right or wrong, true or false, the UN has a pattern of being anti-Israel." Please read this and understand what I am saying. Anti-Israel can be right, and can be true. Please hear me. You already know in your heart, I am different. I do not fit the stereotype. The above quote PROVES it. I am saying here that being anti-Israel can be the correct position to take. But it's complicated.
This is what I meant when I said I would take a dozen steps towards you if you will take one step towards me, even if it means I am walking into enemy territory. Although, I would also literally go into enemy territory to save your life if it came to that, assuming I could assemble a good team to help me do it.
I agreed that zionist and zionism is not the best term and that I used Tsion in letters for a long time but some did not like it.
That is not what is quoted above the words, "Yes and Agree". Why are you avoiding this? ( Nevermind, I understand )
Irrelevant but 'the law'. Which Moses learned from egypt
The reason you consider it irrelevant is because you do not know what it means. Torah does not mean "law". That would be Chukim, or Chukat.
לא־ישאירו ממנו עד־בקר ועצם לא ישברו־בו ככל־חקת הפסח יעשו אתו׃
They shall leave none of it to the morning, nor break any bone of it; according to all the חקת ("Chukat") of the Passover they shall keep it.
Do you consider yourself inerrant?
NO, but you do keep trying to turn it that way
OK, so why is this not being applied in this context? ( Nevermind, I understand )
Knowledge is what enables mankind to understand. Eventually the comprehension and capability to live forever.
That is incomplete. Understanding comes from an awareness of what is known and what is unknown. Both.
The desire to live forever ( a god-like quality ) is noted in what you wrote. The fixation on knowledge is also noted in what you wrote.
And the serpent said to the woman, surely you shall not die;
For God knows that in the day you eat of it, then your eyes shall be opened, and you shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.
The serpent is the one who is saying "surely you shall not die"
The serpent is the one who is saying "you shall be as gods"
The serpent is the one who is advocating for "knowledge"
Knowledge is what enables mankind to understand. Eventually the comprehension and capability to live forever.
Compare that ^^ to what the serpent is saying. The similarity is / should be obvious to you. If it's not, don't worry, bro. I understand.
Fully
Immune from what? I am consistent and yet you write " It goes deeper than that, and no one is immune."
The idolatry for that stupid mount is so bad, many still bang their heads on that wall about daily.
You are asking: "Immune from what?" Answer: From the root cause of the conflict in the Middle East. You are not immune. I am not immune. No one is immune, with only one exception.
It is rare to meet a Christian that fully understands idolatry. For example, it is written in Jewish law that Anger is Idolatry. I think it is Chapter 17 or 27 of the Schulchan Aruch. ~searching for confirmation~ Chapter 29. Please note that is what Rabbis teach, in general. There are always a few bad apples in every bunch. Do you include this in your understanding of idolatry? If not it is incomplete.
You have a religious conviction which is incorrect per written scripture. If scripture is not authoritative for you, please clearly state that.
Thanks for the compliment.
Not intended as a compliment. A religious conviction which is incorrect is the reason for many deaths? Thousands? Millions?
Scripture is not the last word but purely a guideline. Keep in mind, more than just torah exists as words to be used for wisdom.
Then why did you make the following promise?
You and I both know, only one will create the New jerusalem and I can assure you, promise you that it will not be in palestine/Israel.
Why are you questioning my understanding, if it is just a guideline? See below:
The additions to torah and descriptions often used to translate the meanings (midrash) are often fine attempts but many are less than when tangent to the promise of a universal foundation of unveiling what is real (the truth)
This is not consistent. There is flip-flopping between a desire to be rational, and the behavior which is considering oneself inerrant. There is flip-flopping between scripture being inerrant but also not inerrant.
Please just come out and be honest about your actual position. It is absolute faith in anti-Jewish doctrine, but, it is actually ignorant of Judaism. If you actually consider yourself capable of error, then this should not be difficult to accept and acknowledge. If you actually consider scripture a guideline then this should not be difficult to accept and acknowledge.
If you cannot accept it nor acknowledge it, at least right here and right now, it's OK, bro. I
fully understand your position.
OK, Another compliment. Very focused on the development and evolution of knowledge.
It is only a compliment if being possessed by the words of the forked-tongued serpent is considered "good".
Thank you! Again, you are aware of just how consistent that I am.
It is consistently inconsistent. That is called a "double-standard" or "confirmation-bias". It is a cognitive fault.
Gibberish. But do you even know how to define 'good or evil' that can be drilled down to the commandments?
It's not gibberish. But I fully understand why you are not able to understand it. To answer your question, of course I know how. It's writtten in the Torah, and I am a righteous educated Jewish person. The law is written in general, then it requires judges to interpret them on a case-by-case basis. Deut 17, I think it's verse 11ish ~checking~ Yes! It begins at verse 9, but the punch-line is 11.
I am of the tree of life.
Nope. 1 John 1:8. The truth is not in you. You just contradicted yourself. You said you were not inerrant, and here you are claiming to be the tree-of-life. It's OK, it's not your fault. I understand your position.
I am aware that I have lineage that has been here since day one of the living. No one has been able to convey that process, or reality for comprehension and why so many use religious opinions as their guideline. For example, you consider Eve as doing wrong 'in the beginning' and I do not and comprehend a venue to honor the story rather than condemn.
It's written that the tree of life was infront of her, instead she was fixated on knowledge. It's true. I do not deny your lineage, bro. I accept it, I understand it. But claiming authority due to your lineage predating day-one is an error as well.
ויאמר יהוה לה שני גיים [גוים] בבטנך ושני לאמים ממעיך יפרדו ולאם מלאם יאמץ ורב יעבד צעיר׃
And יהוה said to her, Two nations are in your womb, and two peoples shall be separated from your bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger.
Taking down the olive tree orchards to remove the palestinian way of life, was based on the corrupt actions of the settlers and their RABBID teachers.
You can type the word "Rabbid" as often as you like, it doesn't produce anything in my heart and soul. Since you have been shown to ignore details and avoid responsibility and make unsubstantiated claims, these words have no effect on me.
So why do you keep writing as if condemning my pursuit and fixation on knowledge?
Because it is at the
heart of the problem.
Then asking me to go back to Gen 2 and gen 3 (regressing)
You skipped to Judges. The war has been ongoing since day one. If you want to understand it, let's go back to the beginning and understand it. Let's understand it together. I already brought you the verse. Here it is again:
ילכו מחיל אל־חיל יראה אל־אלהים בציון׃
They go from strength to strength, every one of them appears before God in Zion.
Everyone one of them. From strength to strength. In this context, whom are those two strengths? Your lineage asserts there is only one. But that is not what is written. It cannot be a lineage of "knowledge" and "knowers" if it is willfully ignorant.
AS I intend to grow and develop, thank you. Even as I can read that you do not see that pursuit as credible or the premise of what tsion is supposed to be about.
I support you 100% in your pursuit. But you still do not understand ציון. And it's OK, because I do, and I will do the work for you. My word is my bond.
That I should not pick on the fools and calling them 'zionist'. I am trying not to use the term. But I will consider the rabbi, that mislead the jew (the good who) as the RABBID when that teach that the mount is needed and required.
You are not qualified to make that judgement. You do not **know** scripture. And you do not **understand** what it means. Therefore you cannot acccurate assess whether Rabbis are misleading anyone at anytime. You have admitted you have a theological conviction but you do not seem to **understand** what this means in this context. And, bro-seph, it's OK.
It's OK because I fully understand your position. Hopefully that is now abundantly clear.
Now that is the most horrid set of words that you could write. To me that is direct blaspheme to what is so beautiful about judaism and the 1000's of years of suffering that so many have endured throughout the ages.
Knowledge is what enable mankind to know what 'is real'. It's the universal quest of conscious life.
The reason you consider it blasphemy is becausse you do not actually know Judaism or understand it, at this point it is beyond you. But I am willing to help. The door is open, will you walk through it?
