The use of the phosphorus has no ambiguity. Israel did in fact use them on civilans in 2009. I have watched the videos myself.
Apparently you have no care.
I don't believe you. That's the problem. You have work to do to be considered a source for anything but an anti-Jewish anti-Israel religion.
OK. I never said otherwise
Nope. You did.
You claimed that saying "No Comment" is bearing false witness. Not only is this an example of not understanding, law, evidence and what constitutes a crime, it shows you either cannot keep track of your own words, or do not understand what they mean,
~let's see if anything else in your post deserves a reply~
Jesus was not the christos............ is that what you expect me to say, before you will stop falsely accusing me and using the rhetoric?
I think you should be honest and give us the name of your religion. What are you afraid of? You have already admitted to making conclusions based on a religious ttheology. Why hide? You claim to be clearly stating your postion, yet, you're hiding it.
You care enough to hide your theological position. What's it called?
I know, you will not accept that the RABBID
Projection. Those who scream the loudest are often the most guilty of the same crime.
~let's see if there is anything else~
Living forever is not even hard but how it works is an understanding that eludes most from even basic conversation
Noted. I am fully aware. I told you already. Read my words again slowly to yourself in case they haven't sunk in.
PS... I've got it. I've got it all figured out. You've tipped your hand. Now I see it clearly... well.... Maybe we'll get there, maybe not. The good news is, now that I understand your position. Fully. I can finally crop this reply below the word-count limit.
Whew. The good news for you is, you don't need to explain anything to me. I completely understand your postion. I've heard it before. I've been here for a while, bro.
And, the thing is, you WANT to spill the beans. Deep down you seem to want recognition and validation and the satisfaction of, like I said, "being-in-the-know", but you also seem want the recognition and the awe of it from others.
Living forever is not even hard but how it works is an understanding that eludes most from even basic conversation
It's domininate and possessive. In the extreme. Extremely
possessive.
Are you aware of this? The tree of knowledge was to be desired. Do you understand what that means and hhow dominant and possessive that is. It capivates. Literally.
You declared yourself as the tree-of-life, bro. The signficance this is not beyond me. The need to declare that, is no different than the need to charge after the temple mount. But, guess what? The Rabbis aren't doing that, YOU are. You brought evidnece that they want a festive meal there oone time a year. That's nothing. It honestly appears that YOU think you possess this temple, but it's a metaphorical/spiritual temple in the heart, right? In everyone's heart?
If so, that's dominant and possessive. Even if you want to share it, if the temple did not ever belong to you in the first place, then the dominant possession of it is still wrong. That's theft. And perhaps, there's an argument to be made about stealing from the rich to give to the poor. But, like I said above, "maybe we'll get there, maybe not." At this point I doubt it because you're still stuck in the weeds trying to prove "You're wrong", instead of working together with me.
Just the knowledge to help women with child birth saved more lives than genesis ever did.
You are ignoring the point and obsesssing over knowledge again. Do you want peace or not? Do
you want to be ignored? It can be done rather easily, just like a light switch, and poof... insignificance.
That's a down right LIE (false witness)
Nope. I was careful with my word choices. You do SEEM to have no problem with those aspects of the story. All you need to do is clearly state whether or not you are a Christian. Are you? Are you in Christ? You have taken up the mantle of hatred towards Rabbis and Scribes, whicch is Christian theology. And you spoke of a New Jersalem, made promises like Christian. All of that makes you SEEM like a Christian, and since you won't answer the question aboutt your religion, it seems like you prefer the benefits of that assumption, while being deceptive about it at the same time.
Key word in the above: seem.
What is the scripture you are using to produce the promises that you have made?
just like claiming that i asserted jesus raised to the flesh. Bonafide lying (false accustion)
I didn't claim it. You're lacking attention to the details. That is normal and natural for those in your theology. In order to produce their conclusions they are willfully ignorant while claiming to be gnostic. OOPs did I say the wrong thing.
Of course, you lack the comprehension of much more than your religion.
Now that's ^^ a false claim. And I've already demonstrated I know and understand more about my religion that you do.
I focus on the good and you want to use it to insult
All I see is an obession with pointing at others, manufacturing faults in them, and focusing on your own good and exggerating it.
I don't think you're bad, just misunderstood. Even inn your own eyes, I think you misunderstand yourself. Understanding that could be very rewarding, but, you seem t be blocking it. I think it's that feeling in the heart which feels so good to you, you're afraid to let go of it.
You are missing the point. If you are relying on metaphor, then nothing you are writing which is reliantt on hat metaphor is literally true. Your promises are a deception. And if you trafffic in deception, if that is the currency of your realm, then I don't take you seriously.
From now on, I shall consider your words in the same category as a tortured poet. I think it's a good fit, don't you?
Anyone can twist up many standards and use that method to argue
Not if it's true and consistent in any possible world. That's the highest standard of truth that exists. if you scroll up you'll see it. It's true and consistent in any possible world you claimed "no comment" is "bearing false witness".
I read from left to right and not going backwards just to appease you.
This is an example of willfull ignorance. One cannot be a "knower" while simulatenously "ignoring". And didn't you accuse
me of not understanding my own religion? Wow. Here you are refusing to learn about it. OK, bro. ~eye-rolls~
No, as i am not speaking for a 3rd party ( a god as the literal application of the story represents)
BUZZZZZZ. Wrong answer. You are asumming the serpent was telling the truth. But since you don't speak the language the "serpent" is speaking in the story, you will never know. Oh. Does that sting a little? Knowing you will never know?
From calling me "knowledgable, insightful, and wise,"
I'm not calling you anything unless you are able to honestly see that there is one hiding in plain sight in the story.
OK...... enjoy that feeling of superiority.
There's nothing wrong with it if it's true. False modesty is bearing false witness.
No you want me to comply.
Not at all. You claim to want peace. If that is what you want then there will be some give and take. Are you willing to give up your own dominant possessive obsession over the temple? Not just the physical temple but what it represents? The hearts and minds of others? Can you actually consider other points of view outside of your own?
So far, the answer seems to be 'no'.