McBell
Unbound
Really?Right.... do you think that is it is a coincidence that more mass shootings happen in places that aren't gun free zones?
Please list some of these not in gun free zones shootings.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Really?Right.... do you think that is it is a coincidence that more mass shootings happen in places that aren't gun free zones?
I am almost sure the employers as police in USA will agree that gun ban for civilians .
You're focusing upon problems associated with implementing a policy in the real world.But guns wouldn't magically disappear with a ban. Instead they would flood the black market. The only people who would comply and surrender their guns aren't the ones who are a threat to begin with. It would make them easier prey, though.
Interesting that he's into the LHP and occult and is a conservative Republican. Or was.
But guns wouldn't magically disappear with a ban. Instead they would flood the black market. The only people who would comply and surrender their guns aren't the ones who are a threat to begin with. It would make them easier prey, though.
why do you think it is a good idea to remove all guns from everyone except the criminals and police?this process would take long times maybe 10-20 yeras , that disappear guns from the hand of civilians .
I understand it , i just disagree withBeing from Algeria, you don't understand how the US legal system and Constitutional Law works. It's not that easy.
this process would take long times maybe 10-20 yeras , that disappear guns from the hand of civilians .
I did not mean that , thats missunderstood .why do you think it is a good idea to remove all guns from everyone except the criminals and police?
You do know there are more criminals that police, right?
OASN:
how do you propose theygo about enforcing a complete gun ban??
He also describes himself as "spiritual".Interesting that he's into the LHP and occult and is a conservative Republican. Or was.
I believe it's not holly law , human can edit and change what ever they want , just need the commun sense (all people agree on ) ,Just not going to happen...it's a futile cause to be invested in.
The people who have the ability to even attempt it, don't want anything to do with it - they would literally fight against it themselves.
We're dealing with a massive culture difference that I don't think translates well. We really don't care what other folks in different countries think about it either. I'm saying that be bluntly honest, not rude.
Our idea of citizen vs subject doesn't make sense to most. People here who are former or current law enforcement and/or former or current military members will fight for it.
Really?
Please list some of these not in gun free zones shootings.
Just picking the last one to peruse, I find that this is a gun free zone under local law.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luby's_shooting
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Ysidro_McDonald's_massacre
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binghamton_shootings
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howard_Unruh
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Aurora_shooting
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Edward_Pough
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geneva_County_massacre
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Silka
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/101_California_Street_shooting
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westroads_Mall_shooting
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carthage_nursing_home_shooting
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Seal_Beach_shooting
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_Island_Rail_Road_massacre
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Tucson_shooting
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2013_Hialeah_shooting
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_IHOP_shooting
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_Collier_Township_shooting
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daingerfield_church_shooting
etc...
(I shortened the above list to highlight only several gun free places.)Even if you have a concealed carry permit, you cannot bring a gun into any of the following places:
- on church or synagogue premises (Texas Pen. Code § 46.035.)
- in a hospital (Texas Pen. Code §46.035.)
- on school premises or on a school bus (Texas Pen. Code § 46.03.)
- in an establishment licensed to sell liquor when that business derives 51 percent or more of its income from liquor sales (Texas Texas Pen. Code § 46.035.)
Just picking the last one to peruse, I find that this is a gun free zone under local law.
http://www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/resources/open-and-concealed-gun-carry-laws-texas.htm
(I shortened the above list to highlight only several gun free places.)
I haven't looked at the others, but states typically have a pretty long list of places where we can't legally carry guns.Alright, that's one knocked off the list. Although, the place being gun free seems to have little to do with it, considering the very same church refused to testify on his behalf on court for charges of rape and incest.
Just picking the last one to peruse, I find that this is a gun free zone under local law.
http://www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/resources/open-and-concealed-gun-carry-laws-texas.htm
(I shortened the above list to highlight only several gun free places.)
Before claiming "Boom!", have you checked to see if a prior statute didn't also limit guns in churches?Also, the shooting happened in 1980, way before the statute you reference was implemented as state law. BOOM...
http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/Docs/PE/htm/PE.46.htm
Also, the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun-Free_School_Zones_Act_of_1990 was... well in 1990.
Before claiming "Boom!", have you checked to see if a prior statute didn't also limit guns in churches?
But otherwise, is it necessary to find such long ago shootings in order to counter the claim that the
current problem is exacerbated by the inability of people to defend themselves in gun free zones?
The only way to curb mass murder is to give government much more power to restrict what we can do & own.As I have stated in a previous post is to enforce the laws that are on the books first. Then pass and enforce a law that basically says there is a mandatory sentence of say at least 5 years in prison when a firearm is used in a crime plus tack on a sentence for the crime itself (the "use of firearm law" can not be reduced and must be served). Then somehow the mental health issue must be addressed (and I have no idea how). Will this stop mass killing? The answer is no, where there is a will there is a way, remember Boston, the uni-bomber, and other mass killings that did not involve firearms.