• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Parents call police on teacher over LGBT book.

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Of course.
I think of redneck as being a positive description..

Not the same as white trash.
Both are positive when we refer to each other as such.
But when someone uses the terms to dis another's
race & class, that's bigotry.
 

Audie

Veteran Member
Fair enough, I should have ignored your pointless "creationist" insults.
Insult them? For from it. Ive accurately reported
on their behaviour- insulting themselves far
beyond my small power to add or detract.

Meanwhile, you insulted your own intelligence
with meaningless snark.

Keep it up if you like but its hardly Quality rhetoric.
 

Kathryn

It was on fire when I laid down on it.
Sounds like we're on the same page - let the teacher determine what gets read in their classroom.
No, we're not really on the same page. I don't generally trust teachers to raise up kids the way I would raise them up. They need to stick with the basics more in my opinion.
 

John53

I go leaps and bounds
Premium Member
Insult them? For from it. Ive accurately reported
on their behaviour- insulting themselves far
beyond my small power to add or detract.

Meanwhile, you insulted your own intelligence
with meaningless snark.

Keep it up if you like but its hardly Quality rhetoric.
Good try but I know you know I meant your "creationist" slur directed at Evangelicalhumanist.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
So it's a "racist lite" term used by the elites to dis men doing manual labor?
No, it's more used by whites and blacks, probably originally against the white working class, but it came to take on a disparaging remark against Southerners and those perceived as having as "absence of sophistication," as Foxworthy defines it.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
No, it's more used by whites and blacks, probably originally against the white working class, but it came to take on a disparaging remark against Southerners and those perceived as having as "absence of sophistication," as Foxworthy defines it.
I notice that those who wield the term
seem to believe they're superior to
"rednecks" in education, ethics, & culture.
 

Audie

Veteran Member
Good try but I know you know I meant your "creationist" slur directed at Evangelicalhumanist.
I didn't know that and it want a slur.
It was a valid comparison.
I'm not keeping up that sorry exchange
with him, or you.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
It certainly was in the use that got
the topic started.
" gun- totin' rednecks" or whatever it was
When one can't effectively argue against gun
ownership, it's useful to mis-characterize the
entire group. Or....they're just angry over the
issue, & lash out.
I'm prolly better educated, further north, &
whiter-of-neck than most who'd demonize
me thus.
 

Audie

Veteran Member
When one can't effectively argue against gun
ownership, it's useful to mis-characterize the
entire group. Or....they're just angry over the
issue, & lash out.
I'm prolly better educated, further north, &
whiter-of-neck than most who'd demonize
me thus.
I prolly don't look like a redneck
 
Top