The thing is that Islam has nothing to do with whom are called Muslims, Hitlers followers were Christians,
are all Christians Hitler.
In other words, Islam is completely disconnected from Muslims? Are you really trying to argue that the actions of today's Muslims are not influenced by Islam at all? I think your own actions and arguments are influenced by Islam, and I don't think I'm wrong to think so.
Pakistan isn't an Arabic country but a Muslim country and they're at war with Taliban.
What does Taliban have to do with my argument?
And yes, Pakistan is a Muslim country. I said I was citing free election and poll results
particularly and not exclusively from the Arab world.
Hazem Salah doesn't represent the views of the Egyptians, scholars do say nonsense all the time, so what.
He doesn't represent the views of all Egyptians, but a good portion of Egyptians support Islamists. The majority of voters voted for an Islamist parliament
and an Islamist president in free elections after the 25th of January revolution.
And many think and believe that bin Laden is working to the US and i think you know that.
I made a thread about the kind of people who believe that bin Laden was working for the U.S.:
http://www.religiousforums.com/threads/the-arab-world-the-perspective-of-an-insider.181640/
They're Muslims but i don't agree about flogging a person because of his views.
Al Razi wrote a book against the quran, was he flogged
On the Quran, al-Razi said:
You claim that the evidentiary miracle is present and available, namely, the Koran. You say: "Whoever denies it, let him produce a similar one." Indeed, we shall produce a thousand similar, from the works of rhetoricians, eloquent speakers and valiant poets, which are more appropriately phrased and state the issues more succinctly. They convey the meaning better and their rhymed prose is in better meter. ... By God what you say astonishes us! You are talking about a work which recounts ancient myths, and which at the same time is full of contradictions and does not contain any useful information or explanation. Then you say: "Produce something like it"?!
So the people who are for flogging Raif Badawi are Muslims. Good thing you disagree with them, but that doesn't change the fact that there are also many Muslims who agree with flogging him.
By the way, look up Bashar ibn Burd.
But this person doesn't represent Egypt.
No one represents Egypt; there are only people who represent(ed) the majority of Egypt, like Morsi did when he was elected by a majority, and the fact of the matter is that the majority did elect Islamists to represent them. I think you know what the beliefs of Islamists are like.
The fact is the Egyptians are looking for the food and the peace of mind.
Yeah, and they apparently think that Shari'a is the way to achieve that. That's quite unfortunate.
No, they regard it as an Egyptian art but yes they look sexy with the semi naked dress.
Are you trying to tell me that what I keep hearing, reading, and seeing in my own country is wrong? Seriously, if you are going to try to paint a different picture of Muslims, at least don't try to tell people that the observations before their very eyes are wrong. Acknowledging reality would be a good start to change things for the better.
And what the quran says if we don't want to flog the Adulterers will that lead us to the hell.
the caliphate Umar bin al khatab cancelled the punishment of cutting the hands of the thieves and which
opposes the quran, so what
There are certain conditions for imposing a moratorium on punishments, but that doesn't mean they are canceled forever.
These are a few verses that scholars and Islamists keep citing to support their position that they must implement Shari'a into state law:
َQur'an 5:44 said:
Indeed, We sent down the Torah, in which was guidance and light. The prophets who submitted [to Allah ] judged by it for the Jews, as did the rabbis and scholars by that with which they were entrusted of the Scripture of Allah , and they were witnesses thereto. So do not fear the people but fear Me, and do not exchange My verses for a small price. And whoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed - then it is those who are the disbelievers.
Qur'an 5:45 said:
And We ordained for them therein a life for a life, an eye for an eye, a nose for a nose, an ear for an ear, a tooth for a tooth, and for wounds is legal retribution. But whoever gives [up his right as] charity, it is an expiation for him. And whoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed - then it is those who are the wrongdoers.
Qur'an 4:46 said:
And let the People of the Gospel judge by what Allah has revealed therein. And whoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed - then it is those who are the defiantly disobedient.
(
Source of translation.)
The majority of scholars interpret these verses to mean that Muslims must rule their countries with Shari'a. The Muslims who voted for Islamists apparently agreed with them or at least didn't mind the concept of Shari'a's being made into state law.
The Muslims world needs a leader similar to Umar and Saladin
Do you think a leader like Umar and Saladin would give atheists, homosexuals, Hindus, Buddhists, etc., their rights and freedoms, or would he punish people for premarital sex, "practicing homosexuality," attacking or criticizing religion, and promoting secularism, among other things? I would totally support an Islamic leader if he or she were to provide these minorities with their complete rights and freedoms.