Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Like I said, what about the Old Testament is untrue beyond a shadow of a doubt? In Genesis 1:2 it says that the Ruach of God MRChPT over the waters. MRChPT in this case means to hover in and out of being recognized. At some points God wants to be seen and at other points he wants to be doubted. Likewise there are some ways of looking at the Old Testament that have more evidence apparent than others.The problem with the Old Testament it is collection of historically questionable books of poor provenance, Believing they are true is simply based on the belief that it is true without evidence.
Religions are corrupt not fake.Insert arguments below
Name your religion and convince me that it is true
Like I said, what about the Old Testament is untrue beyond a shadow of a doubt? In Genesis 1:2 it says that the Ruach of God MRChPT over the waters. MRChPT in this case means to hover in and out of being recognized. At some points God wants to be seen and at other points he wants to be doubted. Likewise there are some ways of looking at the Old Testament that have more evidence apparent than others.
Again, my challenge:
Raelism claims to have incontestable proof from the Old Testament and other books that it is true. I have never seen an argument last against it.
In the mean time, since Raelism believes in most of the other religions, find me two verses from two other religions that contradict or a verse you can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt untrue.
In the mean time, it is a religion my parents detest.
Actually there are many verses in the Bible about UFOs and Aliens, along with the Koran, Buddhist scripture and the Book of Mormon. For instance, when the cloud gave light to the Israelites and smoke to the Egyptians while they were making their way to the Red Sea, it could have been a modified UFO. When many verses about modern technology are shown, it becomes proof. Especially since new results happen every so often to confirm it.Your challenge is as meaningless as it can get. A UFO religion based on what? Pure speculation and absolutely no evidence.
Actually there are many verses in the Bible about UFOs and Aliens, along with the Koran, Buddhist scripture and the Book of Mormon. For instance, when the cloud gave light to the Israelites and smoke to the Egyptians while they were making their way to the Red Sea, it could have been a modified UFO. When many verses about modern technology are shown, it becomes proof. Especially since new results happen every so often to confirm it.
But thank you for MRChPhTing on my post; it is helpful if people doubt me.
You do realize that could describe your religion, right? Practically every religion? "UFO's and mythical deities, they must be bonkers! Jesus raising from the dead and angels floating about? Absolutely truth!"speculative interpretation of bad dreams visions, eating mushrooms, hallucinations, and like many people today that have a very creative imagination
You do realize that could describe your religion, right? Practically every religion? "UFO's and mythical deities, they must be bonkers! Jesus raising from the dead and angels floating about? Absolutely truth!"
Load a' mess.
Insert arguments below
Name your religion and convince me that it is true
Of course, I want to learn from the process of debate, while someone is trying to convince me wrong.
For me, I like to depend on my logic and science to see whether something is real or not.
So you make a claim and want everyone to work to disprove it.Insert arguments below
So you make a claim and want everyone to work to disprove it.
See my previous postsYour claim: "All religions are fake"
The burden of proof is on you, not on us.
As in, not our job.
Besides, you haven't given us the level of evidence you would consider to be proof.
For instance, I have, several times, heard atheists/anti-theists flatly say that if God Himself came down and declared, Personally, that He existed and that a specific belief system about Him was the 'right' one, that they would not consider that to be sufficient proof.
(shrug)
So...again, your problem, your burden of proof.
I think if God made a religion, it would be perfect and without any fake aspects.Well Buddhism has fake aspects to it. Not all of it is going to be true. That's actually a relief for me.
If it was touted as a religion being completely true, I might as well have stayed with Christianity with all the stained glass and Rose Colored Glasses intact with all the drama mystique and intrigue that comes with it! ;0]
I loseNarcissistic Solipsistic Nihilism, good luck.
Neither do I. Why would something completely alien and different to us require worship?"I do not see any point why if there is a God he would come to our world and tell us to be good and love and worship him.
So your God is a supermagician type creator god. Not the only type, but one which antitheists and literalist theists from religions popular in much in the world like to debate based on their gut.When I think of God, I think of someone with great power, which can do anything that he want with a snap of a finger, since he created the universe.
That's all nice, but completely specific some type of Christianity.In most religions, I see God coming in a form of a man, and struggling. If he wants us to know about him, I think that it could be easier than for example Jesus Christ, having to live 30 years as a man, do many good things to bad people, get tortured and killed, and then come back to life. Another example of how I question religion is, imagine if you are a God, imagine you are playing sims, would you go and as a man and tell your people "Hey I am a good person and I love you all. Be good and love me". I do not think that if God is so great, that someone else overcome him to make a "Hell" for the bad people. For me religion seems like a strategy of controlling people. Tell your people to be good so that they can enjoy a perfect afterlife or if they are bad they will burn in fire. I can list many more things but I will take it a bit slow."
That's not what I was criticizing. It was making a claim without offering anything for debate and then asking others to refute it. A common deal on internet fora for sure, but not conducive to any discussion worth your time.If anyone else will say that I did not say anything to be argumented against, I will ignore it, I think posting 3 times without anyone replying to you and getting criticized for not having that post is enough.