• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Russian chest thumping - Chinese incursions

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
I am supporting this example, to make you guys see that my country was wise to sign an armistice immediately.
Because Italians wanted peace.

Does Zelensky want peace? I doubt it. Neither do his companions Soros, Nuland and their kind.

Neville Chamberlain also wanted peace, if we're resorting to old examples.
The question isn't 'do you want peace' so much as choosing the path which ultimately results in less war. Which is more difficult to identify than just refusing to fight.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
Neville Chamberlain also wanted peace, if we're resorting to old examples.
The question isn't 'do you want peace' so much as choosing the path which ultimately results in less war. Which is more difficult to identify than just refusing to fight.

The question is: "dear Zelensky, are you disposed to sacrifice hundreds of human lives instead of negotiating and finding a diplomatic solution?".
The answer is yes. He does want to sacrifice them. But he won't go to the battlefield, of course. He stays safe and warm.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
The question is: "dear Zelensky, are you disposed to sacrifice hundreds of human lives instead of negotiating and finding a diplomatic solution?".
The answer is yes. He does want to sacrifice them. But he won't go to the battlefield, of course. He stays safe and warm.
What diplomatic solution do you think
would be acceptable to Putin?
What consequences do you think this
would have for Moldova & Poland?
 

Wandering Monk

Well-Known Member
Neville Chamberlain also wanted peace, if we're resorting to old examples.
The question isn't 'do you want peace' so much as choosing the path which ultimately results in less war. Which is more difficult to identify than just refusing to fight.

Yeah, and he gave away OTHER PEOPLE'S countries for 'peace in our time.'
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
The question is: "dear Zelensky, are you disposed to sacrifice hundreds of human lives instead of negotiating and finding a diplomatic solution?".
The answer is yes. He does want to sacrifice them. But he won't go to the battlefield, of course. He stays safe and warm.
Shouldn't Italy offer Russia some of its own territory - perhaps Sicily - for the sake of peace, if that's what they truly want?
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
Shouldn't Italy offer Russia some of its own territory - perhaps Sicily - for the sake of peace, if that's what they truly want?

Diplomacy is something extraordinarily effective and marvelously fruitful.
Because anything can be negotiated. And the art of bargaining is better than using weapons.

Weapons are bad, I am even against the 2nd amendment, go figure.

If the two belligerent parties really want peace, there are thousands of international lawyers that can help them negotiate, around a table. And Ukraine won't lose anything. Any territory.
It will get enormous economic advantages.
 

lukethethird

unknown member
Torturing and raping children doesn't leave much room for moral ambiguity, does it?
For anyone to be capable of committing such acts tells me all I need to know about them. Same with their apologists.


I've done my research. I prefer credible, objective, sunstantiated sources.
Of course the evil is one sided, only Russians rape and torture otherwise it doesn't fit with the narrative.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
Of course it isn't. Are you suggesting that one justifies the other?

No...but who started it is to blame.
It means that they wanted to use a pretext to provoke the Russians.
And I can demonstrate it in any International Penal Court.
I wait for Soros, Nuland and their similar, to The Hague, to talk about it.
 

ImmortalFlame

Woke gremlin
No...but who started it is to blame.
Russia.

It means that they wanted to use a pretext to provoke the Russians.
Are you SERIOUSLY trying to suggest that Ukraine deliberately provoked Russia into invading them?

And I can demonstrate it in any International Penal Court.
Really? Like you could demonstrate Putin wanted peace with some "classified documents" you had? I remember you telling met that here: The NATO

And yet, funnily enough, these documents ceased to appear, were never mentioned again, and you even edited all mention of them out of your previous posts.

You have already proven that you are willing to outright lie to support a pro-Russia narrative. I would trust you on subjects of international relations as much as I would trust a snake to play a banjo.

I wait for Soros, Nuland and their similar, to The Hague, to talk about it.
When in doubt, engage in conspiracy theories.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
Russia.


Are you SERIOUSLY trying to suggest that Ukraine deliberately provoked Russia into invading them?
.
I can demonstrate it. :)
I have so much material and witnesses...that I can demonstrate it in any international or national criminal court in Europe. :)
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
When in doubt, engage in conspiracy theories.
I vividly recall when some politicians used to call conspiracy theorists some magistrates that were investigating about the matrimony between mafia and politics.
Now these politicians are in jail.

So whoever misuses the expression conspiracy theory is not right, a priori, in my humble opinion.
It's a logical fallacy.
 

ImmortalFlame

Woke gremlin
I can demonstrate it. :)
I have so much material and witnesses...that I can demonstrate it in any international or national criminal court in Europe. :)
Go ahead then.

Like I said, I remember when you said you had a document that proved Putin wanted peace. And when I asked for it, you stopped talking about it and deleted all mention of it.

I believe you're just lying.
 
Top