• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Salvation in Christianity

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
My sense is that you are externalizing the story entirely and merging it with human history (the human story), meaning you can say this part of the story happened at this location on this date and so on. That’s fine initially. Jesus acted out the story with this in mind.

However, the story of the Kingdom eventually has to be internalized and navigated within. The spirit of truth, for instance, is within. The soul is the child of God, so the living Son is an aspect of your soul. The entire story of the Kingdom and all of the characters are within, which means the Kingdom is within.

I made a relevant thread a short time ago about three aspects of faith, going from the external to the internal.
I guess this has something to do with what Jesus said in Luke 17:

20 And when he was demanded of the Pharisees, when the kingdom of God should come, he answered them and said, The kingdom of God cometh not with observation:
21 Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you.


That the Kingdom is within is a valid viewpoint.
 

osgart

Nothing my eye, Something for sure
I don't think you are making it up but where do they get these ideas? You must know that all Christians don't believe the same things so that means they must be interpreting the Bible differently. Who is to say which Christians have the correct interpretation or if any of them do?
Yeah I'm aware of that. The independent Baptist's hold these beliefs.

There is no correct interpretation as it is interpreted however it strikes the believer's mind and what certain church's agree on.

I believe the original authors meant this book quite literally. The salvation message is as written. The prophetic interpretation is something all independent Baptists have agreed on. So from a kjv 1611; there's a lot to be taken literally.

It's meant exclusively for those who believe in Jesus, and no other name by which a man must be saved according to the bible as it is written.
 

1213

Well-Known Member
If someone’s sins are forgiven, but they don’t end up in paradise, would you still consider them saved? I’m guessing not. If not, then you consider salvation being in paradise.
No, I think salvation means only that person is saved from the judgment. And, then, if person is, or becomes righteous, he will get eternal life, as promised in the Bible. And eternal life goes so that when body dies, all people go to "grave", into a waiting place. And that is divided into two sections Hades and Paradise. And when the judgment day comes, all those people in there will be raised for judgement. And those who are righteous will then go into eternal life, and the others into place where soul and body are destroyed (Gehenna/hell). That is how I have understood the Bible.

I saw the dead, the great and the small, standing before the throne, and they opened books. Another book was opened, which is the book of life. The dead were judged out of the things which were written in the books, according to their works. The sea gave up the dead who were in it. Death and Hades gave up the dead who were in them. They were judged, each one according to his works. Death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire. This is the second death, the lake of fire. If anyone was not found written in the book of life, he was cast into the lake of fire.
Revelation 20:12-15

And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.
Matt. 10:28
 

1213

Well-Known Member
Too bad the Bible isn't clearer on these crucial issues. Christians disagree on so many of these ideas how can any feel comfort and security?
For me the Bible is enough. If some Christian opinions are different than what the Bible tells, it is sad, but luckily we still have the Bible, for everyone who wants to find the truth.
 

1213

Well-Known Member
thats a nice thought , however

Romans 6:7

"For the one who has died has been acquitted from his sin."

That is speaking of people "who died to sin". Meaning, when you are forgiven and saved, you can be dead to sin, it no longer controls you.

May it never be! We who died to sin, how could we live in it any longer?
Romans 6:2
 

joelr

Well-Known Member
Salvation did not originate in Christianity. The Greek Hellenistic religions were the original salvation religions and they occupied Israel 1 century before Christianity started.
Also savior deities, redemption fro souls getting to an afterlife, baptism, eucharist and other Christian concepts were first in Hellenism.
The Britannica entry on Hellenistic religion really illuminates what came from the Greek traditions. The dates for this movement is 300 BCE to 100 CE, so they were the originators.




Changes that religions began taking from Hellenistic religions (this describes Judaism to Christianity exactly) - how many times is salvation mentioned.


-the seasonal drama was homologized to a soteriology (salvation concept) concerning the destiny, fortune, and salvation of the individual after death.


-his led to a change from concern for a religion of national prosperity to one for individual salvation, from focus on a particular ethnic group to concern for every human. The prophet or saviour replaced the priest and king as the chief religious figure.


-his process was carried further through the identification of the experiences of the soul that was to be saved with the vicissitudes of a divine but fallen soul, which had to be redeemed by cultic activity and divine intervention. This view is illustrated in the concept of the paradoxical figure of the saved saviour, salvator salvandus.


-Other deities, who had previously been associated with national destiny (e.g., Zeus, Yahweh, and Isis), were raised to the status of transcendent, supreme


-The temples and cult institutions of the various Hellenistic religions were repositories of the knowledge and techniques necessary for salvation and were the agents of the public worship of a particular deity. In addition, they served an important sociological role. In the new, cosmopolitan ideology that followed Alexander’s conquests, the old nationalistic and ethnic boundaries had broken down and the problem of religious and social identity had become acute.


-Most of these groups had regular meetings for a communal meal that served the dual role of sacramental participation (referring to the use of material elements believed to convey spiritual benefits among the members and with their deity)


-Hellenistic philosophy (Stoicism, Cynicism, Neo-Aristotelianism, Neo-Pythagoreanism, and Neoplatonism) provided key formulations for Jewish, Christian, and Muslim philosophy, theology, and mysticism through the 18th century


- The basic forms of worship of both the Jewish and Christian communities were heavily influenced in their formative period by Hellenistic practices, and this remains fundamentally unchanged to the present time. Finally, the central religious literature of both traditions—the Jewish Talmud (an authoritative compendium of law, lore, and interpretation), the New Testament, and the later patristic literature of the early Church Fathers—are characteristic Hellenistic documents both in form and content.


-Other traditions even more radically reinterpreted the ancient figures. The cosmic or seasonal drama was interiorized to refer to the divine soul within man that must be liberated.


-Each persisted in its native land with little perceptible change save for its becoming linked to nationalistic or messianic movements (centring on a deliverer figure)


-and apocalyptic traditions (referring to a belief in the dramatic intervention of a god in human and natural events)



- Particularly noticeable was the success of a variety of prophets, magicians, and healers—e.g., John the Baptist, Jesus, Simon Magus, Apollonius of Tyana, Alexander the Paphlagonian, and the cult of the healer Asclepius—whose preaching corresponded to the activities of various Greek and Roman philosophic missionaries


Hellenistic religion - Beliefs, practices, and institutions
 

cataway

Well-Known Member
Salvation did not originate in Christianity. The Greek Hellenistic religions were the original salvation religions and they occupied Israel 1 century before Christianity started.
Also savior deities, redemption fro souls getting to an afterlife, baptism, eucharist and other Christian concepts were first in Hellenism.
The Britannica entry on Hellenistic religion really illuminates what came from the Greek traditions. The dates for this movement is 300 BCE to 100 CE, so they were the originators.




Changes that religions began taking from Hellenistic religions (this describes Judaism to Christianity exactly) - how many times is salvation mentioned.


-the seasonal drama was homologized to a soteriology (salvation concept) concerning the destiny, fortune, and salvation of the individual after death.


-his led to a change from concern for a religion of national prosperity to one for individual salvation, from focus on a particular ethnic group to concern for every human. The prophet or saviour replaced the priest and king as the chief religious figure.


-his process was carried further through the identification of the experiences of the soul that was to be saved with the vicissitudes of a divine but fallen soul, which had to be redeemed by cultic activity and divine intervention. This view is illustrated in the concept of the paradoxical figure of the saved saviour, salvator salvandus.


-Other deities, who had previously been associated with national destiny (e.g., Zeus, Yahweh, and Isis), were raised to the status of transcendent, supreme


-The temples and cult institutions of the various Hellenistic religions were repositories of the knowledge and techniques necessary for salvation and were the agents of the public worship of a particular deity. In addition, they served an important sociological role. In the new, cosmopolitan ideology that followed Alexander’s conquests, the old nationalistic and ethnic boundaries had broken down and the problem of religious and social identity had become acute.


-Most of these groups had regular meetings for a communal meal that served the dual role of sacramental participation (referring to the use of material elements believed to convey spiritual benefits among the members and with their deity)


-Hellenistic philosophy (Stoicism, Cynicism, Neo-Aristotelianism, Neo-Pythagoreanism, and Neoplatonism) provided key formulations for Jewish, Christian, and Muslim philosophy, theology, and mysticism through the 18th century


- The basic forms of worship of both the Jewish and Christian communities were heavily influenced in their formative period by Hellenistic practices, and this remains fundamentally unchanged to the present time. Finally, the central religious literature of both traditions—the Jewish Talmud (an authoritative compendium of law, lore, and interpretation), the New Testament, and the later patristic literature of the early Church Fathers—are characteristic Hellenistic documents both in form and content.


-Other traditions even more radically reinterpreted the ancient figures. The cosmic or seasonal drama was interiorized to refer to the divine soul within man that must be liberated.


-Each persisted in its native land with little perceptible change save for its becoming linked to nationalistic or messianic movements (centring on a deliverer figure)


-and apocalyptic traditions (referring to a belief in the dramatic intervention of a god in human and natural events)



- Particularly noticeable was the success of a variety of prophets, magicians, and healers—e.g., John the Baptist, Jesus, Simon Magus, Apollonius of Tyana, Alexander the Paphlagonian, and the cult of the healer Asclepius—whose preaching corresponded to the activities of various Greek and Roman philosophic missionaries


Hellenistic religion - Beliefs, practices, and institutions
how do you define Salvation ?
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
For me the Bible is enough. If some Christian opinions are different than what the Bible tells, it is sad, but luckily we still have the Bible, for everyone who wants to find the truth.
All Christians, including yourself, have an interpretation. Even reading the Bible literally is an interpretation. So you can't accuse your fellow Christians of having opinions "different than what the Bible tells" assums your approach is correct. Given facts about the world that is available in the 21st century, no one can interpret the Bible at face value, literally. If that is your approach then you might believe you have found truth, but will have a huge conflict with facts and reality. So you seem to be seeking some religious "truth", not factual truth about how things are in reality. That is your inner conflict to resolve.
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
how do you define Salvation ?
I found it interesting how different salvation is in Judaism to Christianity. In Judaism any ordinary person can be deemed a savior, and that means anything a person does to help another falls into that description. Judaism does not recognize the Christian savior, or the Christian definition of salvation. I can see how the Jewish idea was used as a basis for the Christ myth in that the sacrifice helps those select believers move past their sin. How Christianity evolved this idea to be literal surely has a problem in modernity.
 

cataway

Well-Known Member
I found it interesting how different salvation is in Judaism to Christianity. In Judaism any ordinary person can be deemed a savior, and that means anything a person does to help another falls into that description. Judaism does not recognize the Christian savior, or the Christian definition of salvation. I can see how the Jewish idea was used as a basis for the Christ myth in that the sacrifice helps those select believers move past their sin. How Christianity evolved this idea to be literal surely has a problem in modernity.
salvation in Judaism? did that not come and go 2000 years ago
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
salvation in Judaism? did that not come and go 2000 years ago
No. The Jewish idea came well before that. It is still a different definition than what Christians claim.

The Israeli band Minimal Compact wrote a song called Salvation in the late 80's which reflects the Jewish idea.

 

cataway

Well-Known Member
No. The Jewish idea came well before that. It is still a different definition than what Christians claim.

The Israeli band Minimal Compact wrote a song called Salvation in the late 80's which reflects the Jewish idea.

i am referring to the point that the messiah did come to the Jew's but they denied him
 

Treasure Hunter

Well-Known Member
i am referring to the point that the messiah did come to the Jew's but they denied him
Denying the Son is part of the story. The Disciples denied him. Christians today deny him in ways they don’t realize. That’s why there is repentance and forgiveness.
 
Top