Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
When you only recognize reporting that lines up with what you already believe, it won't do anything to educate you.
I'm just asking you a simple question.
And then coming forward again just before the 2024 election.
The democrats will probably wait until the Republicans stop bringing out a convicted felon....
Idiots on TV are not evidence. And yes, there was a crime. It has been clearly laid out here several times. If you do not understand that by now that is your fault.
Oh she was looking to make a buck from it. That is not illegal.
I think you have that backwards. Placing a former president above the law is more consistent with a banana republic.
You like to use that term freely, but it doesn't apply to the recent trial or any of the civil trials that adjudicated against Trump. A kangaroo court is a mock trial that only superficially resembles an honest courtroom trial, but exists to charge the innocent and to exonerate dictators and other criminals. The two Senate trials following Trump's twin impeachments were kangaroo courts. They were determined to exonerate a criminal.
That's already been explained to you. The 34 counts were based on 34 documents - 11 cancelled checks, 12 vouchers, and 11 invoices - that represented the commission of a single crime in furtherance of one or more secondary crimes. What would be odd would be to consider any of those evidence of guilt but not all of them. Maybe if one of the checks went unsigned, maybe then you could exonerate him on one charged felony.
Nor need or should he. He should use any and every tactic that promotes success. The Republicans are not the loyal opposition. Thery are disloyal (to the Constitution) enemies, and can be treated like other enemies of America like Putin. There's also no moral duty to Putin.
Maybe, although not in a legal sense that might help him down the road. He kept nodding off, he couldn't control his gas, and he seemed to not understand what was happening to him. He fist-bumped somebody who had just given damning testimony against him.
Substitute OJ for Trump.
Yes, it is predictable, and would also be correct. This court can no longer represent that it is impartial regarding Trump. We know that Trump has allies in SCOTUS that got two of his trials delayed on the pretense that presidential immunity from the law without a Senate conviction of an impeachment deserves serious consideration.
Trump has called the press the enemy of the people, calling immigrants criminals and vermin making the race impure, wanting Hillary Clinton prosecuted, calling Charlottesville protestors good people, openly admiring Hitler and other dictators, and the like. He is a fascist.
The Biden campaign has already begun making good use of that gaffe. Hannity tried so hard to steer Trump in the other direction, to say that he had no desire to be a dictator, but that's not the answer Trump gave him.
LOL. You forgot his great people skills, his great sense of humor, his great respect for the law, his great patriotism, his great education, his great vocabulary, his great children, and his great business acumen.
Thanks for your confession.
Look how you don;t understand the crimes after all these explanations. What was that you said above?
I use reputable media sources, and reject dubious ones. I refuse to expand my horizons by compromising my ethical standards.
Where am I defensive? You're asking me for opinions on matters I have no information about.
I don't know any details about how her story came to light outside of what was reported in regards to the trial. Like I said, why don't you do some research and report back to us since you seem obsessed about this. I'm indifferent.
No, the act of a rational businesswoman doing that capitalist thing of selling while the stock is likely highest.
Wow.
What due process was not met? The felony crime that was committed was made clear. What makes you think that it was "arbitrary"?
Oh please, Trump was cheating on his wife while she was pregnant with their first son together at that time. And you spout that bull****?? No one has claimed that Stormy was an angel. But she did not break the law.
