Pogo
Well-Known Member
I think you could well use a better "source" or at least read the whole thing.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Should Donald Trump be Sentenced to Jail for 34 Felonies?
- Thread starter Stonetree
- Start date
Laniakea
Not of this world
He is required to release the recording. He's in contempt of Congress if he doesn't. His personal views against the members of Congress (who represent the people since they were elected, which Garland was not) is not relevant.
Laniakea
Not of this world
Aren't you able to read a clearly written definition?
Wandering Monk
Well-Known Member
Add also this fact: the President has invoked Executive Privilege over these recordings. I don't think Garland was allowed to release them because the President is constitutionally the top law enforcement agent in the country.Do you mean Garland refusing to release the video of the Biden interview? They have the transcript. They haven't given a credible reason why they would need the video. And given the unethical behavior of Jordan and Comer these MAGAs can't be trusted with the video. These two have a history of lying, so they have eliminated themselves as credible oversight officials. MAGAs don't have honor or princples, they they expect the democrats to have them, and pressure them by exploiing the system. The system is an honor system, and those who disrespect it are not allowed to use it.
Let's add that Trump is challenging the appointment of special councels, which is what Robert Her was in his investigation into Biden in the first place.
One year after Trump classified documents indictment, defense challenge of special counsel takes center stage
One year after a federal grand jury indicted former President Donald Trump for his alleged illegal possession of classified documents, trial dates have come and gone in favor of a slew of hearings …www.sun-sentinel.com
So which is it, are they valid or not for MAGA? They can't have it both ways like corrupt people do.
Garland isn't doing anything illegal or unethical. He recognized the corrupt members who lack honor, and are trying to exploit an honor system. Garland is respectable. Jordan and Comer are corrupt, and can't be trusted.
Laniakea
Not of this world
You mean he's being a dictator?
Oh no! We can't have that!!!
He is not. You might think he should do it, but he is not required to do it.
Wandering Monk
Well-Known Member
Executive privilege can only be invoked by a sitting president. Trump has tried to claim it for his post-presidency cases.
Laniakea
Not of this world
If it shows biden to be a forgetful old man (something the public should know about before the upcoming election), then Garland is interfering in the election by withholding the information. But we may just have to do with what we have. Wandering off and needing to be retrieved by the Italian Prime Minister. "Mr. Biden! Ice cream over here!"
Laniakea
Not of this world
And only a sitting president can act like a dictator. Biden is demonstrating that.
McBell
Unbound
@Subduction Zone mention of K-court is in RESPONSE to your whining about K-court.
But hey, no need to allow truth or facts to interfere, right?
Surely it doesn't work like that???????
I mean aren't there sentencing guidelines that judges have to follow?????
Wonderful example of propaganda. Biden was walking over to talk to one of the skydivers. And then was told they were going to take a picture. That is hardly evidence of "a forgetful old man".
Laniakea
Not of this world
If judges are handcuffed by guidelines, maybe the guidelines should be put on the bench instead of judges. Same for juries.
I don't see it as judges being handcuffed
I see it as standardising sentencing and about being impartial and fair
There is supposed to be the rule of law, not the rule of judges
Judges are not the law
Laniakea
Not of this world
Yet he was the only one in the entire group who didn't know that, and then wandered off and had to be brought back?
Last time, it was the Easter Bunny who had to keep his attention. Now it's the PM of Italy.
At least he's stepping up who his baby-sitters are when his wife isn't around.
He was being kind, he was taking interest in another human being. The majority were talking to on skydiver, he went over to talk to another one of them
(feeding the wolf of kindness and compassion).
Laniakea
Not of this world
He's supposed to be feeding the wolf of competency and senility.
That poor wolf is long-overdue for being fed. He should get one to be his pet in place of his dog Commander (the one that attacks Secret Service agents).
Laniakea
Not of this world
Me? I feed birds.
Feeding wolves only keeps them coming back for more sheep.
Pogo
Well-Known Member
HaHa, it is not even vaguely a definition just a list of non-standard grammatical uses of quotation marks, most of which are contrary to the only one you apparently read.