• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Some Mormon missionaries tried to talk to me.

Grumpuss

Active Member
Please refrain from calling people liars when they haven't. "Thou shalt not bear false witness," I believe is one of the 10.
I thought "you were done"? I mean, if you can't report people to get them warnings, why would people give you more ammunition?

You claim not to see advertisements... ever. That's a statement of shocking proportions.
 

Watchmen

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Tell them to make a youtube about it. Don't harass people ON THEIR OWN PROPERTY.

It's not safe to do so in many places. I won't mourn anyone who walks into a trigger-happy person's yard, to be frank.

It's not harassment you big baby. They knock on your door. You either answer or you don't. If you do you can say you're not interested and close the door. If you want legal speak, to be harassment the conduct must be severe or pervasive. That is hardly the case.

Oh, and your comment about not mourning anyone who walks into a trigger happy person's yard is absolutely disgusting and speaks volumes about your lack of character.
 

The Kilted Heathen

Crow FreyjasmaðR
You're becoming needlessly confrontational.
No, actually I'm not; what's funny is that my arguments have remained just there in terms of need and severity. What's more amusing is that my arguments have (for the most part, up until now) focused on the core of the issue - the tactics used - rather than statements on the individuals. Whereas your arguments have not only focused on the temperament of these missionaries, but also assumed on us.

So if anyone is really being "us vs them," it's you.

Not wrong.
Stunning rebuttal, especially when I provided a statement of myself saying the exact opposite of your assertion. Do not presume to insist upon my sentiments and motivations.

Strawman.
No, because I haven't claimed that it's a statement or argument that you made. It is an example that I crafted to illustrate to you the incorrect nature of your obstinate insistence that I "hate" christian missionaries and no other form of intrusion on my home and personal time. An insistence that is persistently both baseless and wrong.

Why are you telling me? Why don't you tell it to the Mormons, when they actually send their representatives to your precious sanctum sanctorum?
Still overly dramatic... Why am I telling you? Because as should be clear at this point, the missionaries are less-than-prone to listening to what we say. Secondly, you're coming up to bat for them here, insisting on their good nature and presumptuously demeaning to ours. If you can't take our criticisms, perhaps don't address us.

Full o' lies.
They are direct quotes of you. I even took the time to highlight in bold the parts that were either assumptions of us or false accusations.

Also "lost souls"
And yet it's still an assumption that you made. How do you know we're "lost"?

A stunningly telling christian reaction, making it pretty clear that you have no concern or consideration - like the missionaries - of the people that you intrude upon.

Yet you have introduced such an assertion, whenever you condescendingly say "Well when they came to my door, they were really nice and I invited them in for tea". Goody gumdrops for you; I bet you they didn't tell you that Jesus is a false man-god demon, eh?

Remain civil and avoid ganging up on others, please.
Oh, kind of like the God Squad here has ganged up on we who dare to take offense at intrusion of our home and privacy? Please. If you can't take the heat, stay out of the kitchen - though I remind again that in this whole back-and-forth, your end has been more prone to hits closer to personal, whereas we have stayed closer to actions and statements. If anyone is being uncivil, it's you.
 

Desert Snake

Veteran Member
Don't think Callisto is Heathen. However I would wager that you know several Heathen Gods already; Thor, Odin, Loki, Tyr... So long as we're having some form of contest, it is not we Heathens who lack for names, and call our deities by a simple word as though it was a name.
^
Here is an unprovoked attack, although incorrect /you clearly arent familiar with my religious beliefs.
Provide them. Because in the discussion with grumpuss (and even Kat) I've been addressing actions and statements, not the person or their beliefs.
Im talking about the thread, not some specific parts in the thread
 

The Kilted Heathen

Crow FreyjasmaðR
Here is an unprovoked attack
Unprovoked? No. It was in reply to your challenge to name some Pagan gods, worded as unwillingness to name them. Furthermore that statement doesn't address anyone or any specific belief; attacks do, of course, require a target. If you took it either personally or as an attack, that's on you.

My statement there is also not incorrect; there are several faiths that do not name their god. So your insinuation that Paganism and Heathenry aren't godless because names weren't given is inaccurate and - itself - incorrect.
 

Watchmen

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
The first time, no. The second or third time, yes. It is also incredibly poor show to call someone a "big baby" when all they want is to be left alone for your man-god message.
It's not my message. And I think your statement about not mourning these kids getting killed is disgusting and far outweighs me calling you a big baby. I'm not going to waste another keystroke responding to your garbage posts.
 

Grumpuss

Active Member
They said a few things, asked a few questions, and left.
I'm shocked- shocked, I tell you!

Did the Mormon hordes show up later at your house, force their way in and hold you hostage, as they rudely told you about your incorrect beliefs and threaten you with eternal fiery damnation?
 

The Kilted Heathen

Crow FreyjasmaðR
IKR. I was using hyperbolic, self-victimizing logic that I had seen recently... somewhere...
How conceited.

No. I'm not a Mormon. Done.
"The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (the LDS Church or, informally, the Mormon Church) ... Mormonism is the predominant religious tradition of the Latter Day Saint movement of Restorationist Christianity."

'Kay.
 
Last edited:

Watchmen

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
How conceited.


"The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (the LDS Church or, informally, the Mormon Church) ... Mormonism is the predominant religious tradition of the Latter Day Saint movement of Restorationist Christianity."

'Kay.
I'm not LDS. I'm not Mormon.
 
Top