The Kilted Heathen
Crow FreyjasmaðR
Imagine the day, when privacy in one's own home is too much to ask for...
Sent from Windows 10 Mobile
Sent from Windows 10 Mobile
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What you do in your own home is your business, provided it doesn't hurt anyone else.Imagine the day, when privacy in one's own home is too much to ask for...
Sent from Windows 10 Mobile
So sue me if I made a mistake. You waste your time getting butthurt over the littlest things. Whoever made the statement is disgusting.Sure didn't seem like it here:
You actually got the subject wrong twice.
No one's said this. Seriously. Read the thread- no one.
I'm not a Mormon, sir. And I don't broadcast my faith around either. Forgive me for standing up for my fellow Americans' constitutional right to practice their own free speech and free religion.
Read the thread. It's not as you imagine it.
Whiners who think their lives and property are being intruded upon by some kids with pamphlets.
Anyone who tells them they're blowing things out of proportion is suddenly grouped into some "God Squad". Insanity.
So all religious people are the same to you?
You already accused Watchmen of being a Mormon and harboring beliefs he didn't have, all so that you could make some convoluted point about Us vs. Them.
So sue me if I made a mistake. You waste your time getting butthurt over the littlest things. Whoever made the statement is disgusting.
Doesn't follow. Free speech was welcomed by repeated door openings. No one suggested that not wanting to hear LDS pitches was the equivalent of "suppression".You have; unless you're admitting that this attempt to tie in Ragin expressing his irritation with Mormon missionaries repeatedly coming to his door to suppression of Christian religious freedom is nothing more than a red herring.
I wouldn't have cared if it was door-to-door Jews, Muslims or fairy-worshiping Druids. No one attacked anyone else. Disagreement is allowed.I've read the thread. You've done nothing but project your own bad manners & inability to address the poster's claims without attacking the poster on to others. You also condescend and sneer at a non-Christian who has the temerity to say he does't appreciate Christians walking onto his property to try and convert him. The rest of us would be forgiven for thinking Ragin had actually said something outrageous from your hysterical overreaction.
Anyone who claims modern society doesn't have advertisements or that he doesn't see them at least somewhat regularly is lying, yes. Claiming I said things I haven't said and accusing me of a being part of a secret Christian cabal is fairly deplorable behavior.It's this sort of arrogant dismissal that puts people off Christianity. You repeatedly say Ragin is lying (do you even know what that word means?) and that he must only dislike missionary activity on his property because he hates Christians/Christianity. You've just decided he can't possibly have reasons other than that. Please stop being so holier than thou.
You'd have to ask him. When others challenged his "butt-hurt" claims, he started claiming it was part of a "God Squad" that I and anyone who disagrees with him, are apparently members of.Strawman. If all religious people were the same to Ragin this wouldn't be an issue (as that would mean him too). It's recommended but not necessary for you to actually engage your brain before attempting to think. Maybe you could give it a try next time.
So you think it's okay to treat someone at face value, and forgives any and all abuse that ensues? That's like saying any German hates Jews or every pagan believes in animal sacrifice.Watchmen labels himself as LDS so it's not an accusation so much as it's taking Watchmen's religious self-identification at face value. Why is it Ragin's fault that people can't identify themselves honestly?
I don't reward insincere, insulting behavior with civility. I respond to it with dignity.You claimed Ragin made a statement of questionable taste, then doubled down on your accusation. Seriously, can't you just apologise?
Doesn't follow. Free speech was welcomed by repeated door openings.
No one suggested that not wanting to hear LDS pitches was the equivalent of "suppression".
I wouldn't have cared if it was door-to-door Jews, Muslims or fairy-worshiping Druids. No one attacked anyone else. Disagreement is allowed.
Anyone who claims modern society doesn't have advertisements or that he doesn't see them at least somewhat regularly is lying, yes.
Claiming I said things I haven't said and accusing me of a being part of a secret Christian cabal is fairly deplorable behavior.
You'd have to ask him. When others challenged his "butt-hurt" claims, he started claiming it was part of a "God Squad" that I and anyone who disagrees with him, are apparently members of.
So you think it's okay to treat someone at face value, and forgives any and all abuse that ensues? That's like saying any German hates Jews or every pagan believes in animal sacrifice.
I don't reward insincere, insulting behavior with civility. I respond to it with dignity.
He wants to try to bait so that he can report, that's his thing. It's not mine.
I agree. That's what "No Solicitation" signs are for. Or calling the police about harassment. None of that counts though, if you keep opening your door for missionaries and then seething about it on a message board later that missionaries should be allowed to do what they do.Not true at all. Nobody is obligated to listen to missionaries - particularly if they become a nuisance.
I never said a word about defending Christians. Christians don't need my defense when they have the greatest protector in the Universe. But in the United States, we do have that freedom to express oneself, to practice one's religion. That freedom doesn't go out the window, just because one antisocial shut-in doesn't like the way one religion proselytizes.So your claims to be defending Christian religious liberty are vacuous. Thanks for clearing that up.
As I said, disagreement is allowed. I'm still here, answering you. The shrill & snide kicked their ball into the woods and left in a huff.Your snide remarks and shrill reactions suggest you feel otherwise.
Actually, yes!Has Ragin actually claimed that? I think not.
And yet here you are.Calling someone a liar when they've quoted you directly saying things is just pathetic.
It's not my thing. If I was annoyed by these LDS kids, I'd phone their church and complain. Painting with such a broad brush and lumping all Christians together seems a wee bit prejudicial on your part.The proof is here before my eyes - Christians can't stand the notion that people don't like being bothered in the privacy of their own homes.
That never happened. He accused me and anyone here disagreeing with him as being part of a "God Squad". Please read through the thread.You could have done Ragin the courtesy of treating him at face value rather than assuming he's part of some conspiracy to persecute Christians.
Well thank you. But it's a public thread. And I've conducted myself just fine. Far from the cowards and losers who can't stand to see a message they disagree with published to others, and who hope they can bait those they view as their enemies and then report them to the admins like a tattling child.First off, that comment was directed at someone else and not you so your response makes no sense. Secondly, that may be how you comport yourself generally but it is not how you've behaved in this thread.
Cowardly. Aww, c'mon back and state more mistruths. Maybe you could allege more lies and insults about my religion?[/quote]You could at least try and refer to the right person when you're being snide about them. Have fun with your persecution complex - you're a fantastic advert for your faith.
Blocked.
Actually there's two worse ones; a couple scams that are going around. The first is from some "Disney Cruise" rewards, and while it sounds like a real person, it's automated. First, "she" acts like she dropped her microphone, and asks if you can hear her - it's all a ploy to get you to say "yes", so that they can use that recording and your information to authorize transactions.I think we are ignoring the real annoying evil here...telemarketers.
Amen, brother.I think we are ignoring the real annoying evil here...telemarketers. They even ring my cell phone now. Mostly when I am busy at work.
Actually there's two worse ones; a couple scams that are going around. The first is from some "Disney Cruise" rewards, and while it sounds like a real person, it's automated. First, "she" acts like she dropped her microphone, and asks if you can hear her - it's all a ploy to get you to say "yes", so that they can use that recording and your information to authorize transactions.
The second I haven't figured out the end-game, I've never called the number back. I have answered the phone, though, and what they leave on your voicemail is the same recording (it turns out) that you get if you try to talk to them. They tell you that there's been a legal case filed against "your name and social security number", yet never give them as a real legal office would. There's also no paper correspondence, which would also be a step taken if there was actual legal action being taken. I assume it's targeted towards people with student debt, but I couldn't say for sure.
Amen, brother.
And this is despite the nonfunctional "Do Not Call List" too. That was something that was supposed to work. A lot better than wishing away the marauding hordes of Mormon kids...
Pursuant to the overall issue, a lot of things like that don't work when they should. What makes it harder on the phone calls is when it's either entirely automated (the Disney call never sent me to a supervisor, it just keep repeating the request for my information), or they call from multiple numbers (I've got "legal cases" searching for me in California, Illinois, Texas, Georgia, and Virginia). And now they have recordings of me saying "what" and "[REDACTED] off".I know. Kinda makes you not want to answer the phone. And the do not call list doesn't seem to work anymore.
Sigh. So did you ever actually try?Signs? Ineffective, as they claim they're not selling anything. They saw them, sure, but to their thinking it doesn't apply. Taking a firm stance and calling the cops would also be ineffective, as by the time they get there the missionaries are already gone. Can they talk to the temple? Sure. But the question then is will the temple actually do anything about it. Or the authorities; the cops here seem to love their red tape.
So do you dispute the need for proper permitting? I grant you these days, the authorities seem perfectly willing to overlook such requirements, when mobs of people "spontaneously" decide to protest Trump or climate change conferences or whatever, but there is a reason these rules exist.I once tried to organize a counter-protest against the Westboro Baptists the very day we found out they were coming; nothing outrageous or vulgar, just a community gathering to show support to the various churches being slandered and attacked. But, we were told that we couldn't do so, as we needed to get a permit before 42 days prior to the event. Despite finding out about the event only two weeks prior.
I get them too- generally Canada. But they have some way of getting local numbers, yeah. I've reported those to the Do Not Call authorities, but the whole point is that some faceless person has sold the cloned number once or twice. 800 numbers have to have a legitimate business entity listed.Do not call list must not work on foreign numbers.
What's wrong with you? These confrontational moods of yours can't be healthy...I told you I'm already done trying to talk to you, grump. Why bother?
I'm disputing your world view that teenage Mormon missionaries should telepathically detect your desire to selectively not have your door knocked on.Can't really claim that I'm the confrontational one here, when you're the one claiming there's something wrong with me.