Right, so obviously you accept that there are SOME invasive procedures necessary for children, right?
Do you believe, for example, it can sometimes be necessary to prescribe children medication, under medical advice?
Heck, we'll even use your comparison to tattoos. Let's say there is a special kind of tattoo that actually can provide a significant benefit to a child's mental health, and that this tattoo can be given under medical supervision after a formal diagnosis and with a thorough study of the child determining it medically necessary. Would you be against a child being given one of those tattoos under those circumstances?