• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Biden Question

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
I wish she had a change of mind.
Why? What are her policy positions? What experience of government can she claim?

But then -- maybe you're right. When Trump got elected, nobody had any idea about his policiy and experience. I guess they weren't bright enough to ask the damned question!
 

Koldo

Outstanding Member
Why? What are her policy positions? What experience of government can she claim?

But then -- maybe you're right. When Trump got elected, nobody had any idea about his policiy and experience. I guess they weren't bright enough to ask the damned question!

Exactly, because... it doesn't matter as much as we would like it to. People are often elected due to what they seem to stand for.
 

Koldo

Outstanding Member
I don't really understand why people talk of Michelle Obama as if she were a candidate.

Obama was easily my favorite POTUS since Carter, and probably ever.

But let his family have a break. They paid high enough a price for caring about that insane country.

A recent poll showed Michelle Obama, and only her, winning against Trump without much of a problem.
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
Can you paint a scenario in which, if Biden stood down, the Democrats could find, nominate and successfully sell another candidate in the 4 months left before the election?

Granted, the party has a process in place for how it could be done (finding a replacement). Under the existing rule, Democratic National Committee Chair Jamie Harrison would name a new nominee, in consultation with Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., and Democratic Governors Association Chair Tim Walz of Minnesota. Their choice would be presented to DNC members — a group of party leaders much smaller and more elite than the delegates to the convention — for ratification or rejection.

And this group of elites would present their nominee to the committed delegates Biden has already won, and naturally they will all think, "Oh, how clever of our overlords -- how could we have been so stupid?" (Out of interest, Biden has won nearly 4,000 delegates, Trump 2,265.)

And then there's selling this new person -- with no record to run on -- as being so much better than Trump, who has at least served a term in the White House.

In my view, Biden's resignation would hand the election to the fascist. In a landslide.
A person on a podcast I listened today made the point that Democrats need to do what conservatives have done with Trump: offer complete support and stop the waffling and uncertainty.

I agree with many that Biden has problems, and should never have run. But the fact is he has decided to run, and he is committed. presidents aren't kings, they run an administration with a vp who will take over if something happens to the president. The elction is too much about personality and not enough about policy.

Democrats need to donate to Biden and then hit Trump with an avalanche of ads that expose his unfitness for office. A poll has revealed that only about 12% of voters have heard of the projct 25 agenda. That needs to be the central aim of the democrats, to show the voters the horrible agenda the MAGAs have for America if Trump is elected. I think if more understand the project 25 agenda they will support the Biden/Harris ticket just out of moral obligation.
 

Pogo

Well-Known Member
to save the American democracy, but my nation needs it preserved for our own good.
I think you are probably safe from invasion but I'm not convinced we are safe from self-immolation.
Have a care for your southern neighbors, if only as much as we seem to care about ours.
A recent poll showed Michelle Obama, and only her, winning against Trump without much of a problem.
 

libre

In flight
Staff member
Premium Member
I'd rather live with a fascist then a marxist or communist if I had no choice in the matter.
This is quite concerning to me, because this is precisely how Fascism presents itself and how it's supporters see themselves.
Like that's very literally the same conspiracy theory that Germans and Italian civilians were sold to justify Fascism.
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
Her winning or her being a candidate?
Her being so uniquely accepted as better than Trump.

Heck, even most Republicans would be better than Trump.

Michelle is incredible. But she is not a politician.

Then again, you are Brazilian. You know how people can fall prey to the promises of a "non-politician" who enters politics.

Even when they happen to have decades as low-clergy, very mediocre and uncivilized politicians...
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
This is quite concerning to me, because this is precisely how Fascism presents itself and how it's supporters see themselves.
Like that's very literally the same conspiracy theory that Germans and Italian civilians were sold to justify Fascism.
That's just not true.
 

Koldo

Outstanding Member
Her being so uniquely accepted as better than Trump.

That's trivial when one doesn't have a bad record or any record at all plus a good reputation.

Heck, even most Republicans would be better than Trump.

Michelle is incredible. But she is not a politician.

That's exactly her advantage.

Then again, you are Brazilian. You know how people can fall prey to the promises of a "non-politician" who enters politics.

And promises of politicians too.
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
It does make sense. It only doesn't make sense if you expected reality to work differently.
What would the sense be?

"I will trust people who claim to do not know what they are doing over those that do, and ignore obvious lies while at it"?

I am aware that some people take the idea that "the politicians are parasites" to ridiculous extremes of self-delusion. That explains Bolso to an extent. But irrationality is irrationality.
 

Koldo

Outstanding Member
What would the sense be?

"I will trust people who claim to do not know what they are doing over those that do, and ignore obvious lies while at it"?

I am aware that some people take the idea that "the politicians are parasites" to ridiculous extremes of self-delusion. That explains Bolso to an extent. But irrationality is irrationality.

Very little knowledge is actually necessary to be a good politician. The technical part can be left to the advisors and supporters. What actually matters is being representative of the electors' will.

Collor had 10 years of experience as a politician before being elected as the president, whereas Lula only had a couple, and I don't have tell you the outcome of each presidency.
 
Top