The Big Bang Theory is dead.

[TagliatelliMonster]

I predict a hilarious non-argument response in 3...2....1...

Satan can deceive.
You just fulfilled yet another prediction from the Bible with exact detail and exact timing.
Good job and you can't help yourself.

Once again, my predictive capabilities hit another homerun.

 

[ratiocinator]

Lenox took Hawking's idea and refuted it,

No. He made an empty claim about what Hawking has said. As far as I can tell he made it up or totally misunderstood.

 

[Esteban X]

Satan can deceive.
You just fulfilled yet another prediction from the Bible with exact detail and exact timing.
Good job and you can't help yourself.

Citation needed. Where in the Bible does it specify 3/12/2023 about anything. What prediction are you referring to?

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Citation needed. Where in the Bible does it specify 3/12/2023 about anything. What prediction are you referring to?

There are well over 2000 predictions from the Bible that have come true with exact timing and detail.
And you are a continual fulfillment in all your thoughts, words, posts and deeds.
Thanks.
The Almighty is getting lots of glory because of you.

 

[Subduction Zone]

There are well over 2000 predictions from the Bible that have come true with exact timing and detail.
And you are a continual fulfillment in all your thoughts, words, posts and deeds.
Thanks.
The Almighty is getting lots of glory because of you.

Another empty and apparently false claim.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Another empty and apparently false claim.

Proven fact.

 

[ratiocinator]

John Lennox Quote

What (Stephen) Hawking says in his book The Grand Design is the universe exists because it needed to exist, and because it needed to exist, it therefore created itself. His conclusion merely restates his premise, which means his argument is circular. Nonsense is nonsense, even when spoken by...

www.azquotes.com

For information, here is an actual quote from The Grand Design.

In the early universe—when the universe was small enough to be governed by both general relativity and quantum theory—there were​

effectively four dimensions of space and none of time. That means that when we speak of the “beginning” of the universe, we are skirting​

the subtle issue that as we look backward toward the very early universe, time as we know it does not exist! We must accept that our​

usual ideas of space and time do not apply to the very early universe. That is beyond our experience, but not beyond our imagination, or​

our mathematics. If in the early universe all four dimensions behave like space, what happens to the beginning of time?​

​

The realization that time can behave like another direction of space means one can get rid of the problem of time having a beginning, in a​

similar way in which we got rid of the edge of the world. Suppose the beginning of the universe was like the South Pole of the earth, with​

degrees of latitude playing the role of time. As one moves north, the circles of constant latitude, representing the size of the universe,​

would expand. The universe would start as a point at the South Pole, but the South Pole is much like any other point. To ask what​

happened before the beginning of the universe would become a meaningless question, because there is nothing south of the South​

Pole. In this picture space-time has no boundary—the same laws of nature hold at the South Pole as in other places. In an analogous​

manner, when one combines the general theory of relativity with quantum theory, the question of what happened before the beginning​

of the universe is rendered meaningless. This idea that histories should be closed surfaces without boundary is called the no-boundary​

condition.​

 

[ratiocinator]

Proven fact.

Another empty assertion. You can't assert something into being proved.

 

[YoursTrue]

Matthew claims Jesus was born before the Death of Herod (4 BC), Luke claims he was born during a census that occurred in 6AD.

You misunderstood what it detailed. Have a good day and bye for now.

 

[McBell]

What is the state of reasoning for repeating the same claims over and over that science is wrong and concluding that science is wrong, because the claims against science are repeated?

Seems to me that repeating the same thing over and over hoping for different results is the very definition of of something...

 

[SavedByTheLord]

For information, here is an actual quote from The Grand Design.

In the early universe—when the universe was small enough to be governed by both general relativity and quantum theory—there were​

effectively four dimensions of space and none of time. That means that when we speak of the “beginning” of the universe, we are skirting​

the subtle issue that as we look backward toward the very early universe, time as we know it does not exist! We must accept that our​

usual ideas of space and time do not apply to the very early universe. That is beyond our experience, but not beyond our imagination, or​

our mathematics. If in the early universe all four dimensions behave like space, what happens to the beginning of time?​

​

The realization that time can behave like another direction of space means one can get rid of the problem of time having a beginning, in a​

similar way in which we got rid of the edge of the world. Suppose the beginning of the universe was like the South Pole of the earth, with​

degrees of latitude playing the role of time. As one moves north, the circles of constant latitude, representing the size of the universe,​

would expand. The universe would start as a point at the South Pole, but the South Pole is much like any other point. To ask what​

happened before the beginning of the universe would become a meaningless question, because there is nothing south of the South​

Pole. In this picture space-time has no boundary—the same laws of nature hold at the South Pole as in other places. In an analogous​

manner, when one combines the general theory of relativity with quantum theory, the question of what happened before the beginning​

of the universe is rendered meaningless. This idea that histories should be closed surfaces without boundary is called the no-boundary​

condition.​

So, your theories answer nothing.

 

[ratiocinator]

So, your theories answer nothing.

No. That would be your absurd and baseless claims of magic.

And, of course, the reason I quoted it was to show that the book doesn't seem to say what John Lennox claimed it did. Hence your assertion that "Hawking used circular reasoning as John Lenox proved." remains unsupported.

 

[Sand Dancer]

Why does it matter? We are here now and that's what's important. We want to find out, sure, but we don't need an all fire agenda to prove or disprove deities.

 

[IndigoChild5559]

But Hawkins used circular reasoning as John Lenox proved.

I'm not sure you even know what circular reasoning is. An example of circular reasoning would be, "The Bible is the word of God. I know this because the Bible says so."

 

[Polymath257]

You're having a problem understanding language.usage because your reference actually confirms what the Bible says.

I’m, no it doesn’t. The Bible says that the earth was made from water. The link discusses how water got to the growing earth. Very different things.

 

[Polymath257]

There are well over 2000 predictions from the Bible that have come true with exact timing and detail.
And you are a continual fulfillment in all your thoughts, words, posts and deeds.
Thanks.
The Almighty is getting lots of glory because of you.

Give *three* with exact timing and details. And show i they are predictions, not statements after the fact.

 

[YoursTrue]

I’m, no it doesn’t. The Bible says that the earth was made from water. The link discusses how water got to the growing earth. Very different things.

You are still misunderstanding. Take care and have a good day.

 

[YoursTrue]

I’m, no it doesn’t. The Bible says that the earth was made from water. The link discusses how water got to the growing earth. Very different things.

Yes, you are continually misunderstanding. Bye again.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Give *three* with exact timing and details. And show i they are predictions, not statements after the fact.

The Jews returning to Israel and the nation coming into being again.
The increase of knowledge in the last days.
The increase of worldwide travel in the last days.
The new versions that have been produced in the last days.
The falling away from faith in the last days.

 

[McBell]

The Jews returning to Israel and the nation coming into being again.
The increase of knowledge in the last days.
The increase of worldwide travel in the last days.
The new versions that have been produced in the last days.
The falling away from faith in the last days.

You forgot the exact timing and details with your above listed generalizations.