The universe according to the QCM is in a state of run away (FiRaaR) expansion.
Wanted to point out quickly: this doesn't appear to be clear using the Quran verses alone -- that there is an expansion; and that it's accelerating. All we know from the verses (assuming we interpret it in this way) is that there was something like a singularity* and that it was "clove asunder." That doesn't imply an accelerated expansion without using normal cosmological data to reach that conclusion.
(* -- Also, note that singularities are outdated concepts in modern cosmology!)
Perhaps that isn't a big deal -- I don't know if your goal is to use both the Quran *and* cosmological data, or to use the Quran alone to
explain the cosmological data.
al-amiyr said:
I have not heard any comment on the first QCM verse presented.
Well, I've already presented my main objection against it; so I opted not to just repeat it and to give the benefit of the doubt while you expound on your argument. Just to refresh, my main objection is that it seems more likely to me that this interpretation of the verse having to do with a cosmological event like the Big Bang Event is an example of something like the Forer Effect -- where perhaps the original author was just using flowery, non-literal language; but in modern times the
poetic language is being interpreted (against the author's possible intent)
literally.
I gave the example of how some aspects of the Bhagavad Gita appear to describe nuclear weaponry; and that some Hindus and pseudohistorians have indeed proposed that it really does describe nuclear devices (and thus has "knowledge ahead of its time") -- but that it's far more likely that it's just an ancient text using hyperbole and metaphor; and that any resemblance to an actual atomic explosion is coincidental.
I think the passage is vague enough (i.e. lacks specific details of a Big Bang Event and cosmological affairs) that it could be a similar example. Of course, it
might describe a Big Bang Event; but then again the Bhagavad Ghita might describe a nuclear device. I think it's difficult to feel really convinced by the passage.