Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
We were!!!So what does that have to do with the price of fish? I thought we were talking about the differing roles of men and women on local and national spiritual assemblies?
No. Not WE, but YOU. Can't you USians discuss anything without dragging you own parochial concerns into it?
We were!!!
Have I got to show you that in a Bahai World L and N SAs will become L and N HJs?
OK....... if you need a non Bahai to show you this as well, please just confirm that you have no idea about it and I'll do my best to teach you about it. But if I have to trawl through the writings yet again I think it's fair to ask that you remember it all for the future. This is unbelievable!
So Mrs Thatcher adopted male characteristics? Love it!
And did Ghandi have feminine characteristics?
That is a quirk of biology, nothing more. It is no justification for the patriarchal gender stereotype that women are typically 'nurturing' and men are not. It also flies in the face of evidence. Assuming someone's personality based on their sex organs is sexist and only serves to perpetuate the patriarchal attitudes you apparently want to rid us of.
You were shown one example. You questioned whether that referred to lsa and nsa sits. I told you that these would become houses of justice in a Baha'i world. You continue to challenge.Go ahead and show me. RF has freedom of speech. What special roles are there for male members of Baha'i local and national spiritual assemblies that are composed of men and women elected each year? There are certainly none now and you have been unable to find anything in the Baha'i writings that says otherwise.
Loverofhumanity...... I don't have to prove anything. All I have to do is respond to your amazing OP that women in power would cause less wars, by reminding you that in Baha'i no women are going to obtain that power!It all comes down to whether Baha'u'llah was the Promised One or not and had infallible knowledge or not because if He did then this is a good not bad decision.
So please get to the real challenge and prove to me Baha'u'llah is false and had no infallible knowledge and that the law He created about women not being eligible to serve on the Universal House of Justice was a mistake.
Loverofhumanity...... I don't have to prove anything. All I have to do is respond to your amazing OP that women in power would cause less wars, by reminding you that in Baha'i no women are going to obtain that power!
It was a mind crushingly crazy OP!
It's about one gender not dominating.
In the Bahá'í World Community men do not dominate like in the current world of politics. The genders are way more balanced so we don't have the conflicts the world has.
There is a greater balanced of the sexes in the Bahá'í Community than anywhere else in the world and we have peace amongst ourselves.
....... not while you continue to remind us all that women are different, could not make the seriosly tough decisions, and have babies!
There have been too many 'squabbles' and exclusions for me to believe that Bahai humans are any different from other humans. In fact, despite their clear gender discrimination the most peaceful, honest, trustworthy and decent people that I know are the Jehovah-Witnesses, growing so fast here that they outgrow their halls every few years. But just as with Bahai their theocratic world would terrify me and probably many others out there.
I think it was Queen Victoria who said about Bahai that if it was good it would flourish. It has diminished around here (Canterbury, Kent, England) despite help from the Quakers who lend their meeting houuse to any .........
You were shown one example. You questioned whether that referred to lsa and nsa sits. I told you that these would become houses of justice in a Baha'i world. You continue to challenge.
You don't know as much about Baha'i as you profess, it seems.
You need to study the writings more closely, methinks.
Don't misunderstand when I say that realistically, this is a man's world, and the only way there would be peace on earth is God willing through divine intervention, not giving women the reins. Look how well that went with Germany and Europe.
Your OP is wishful thinking.
I think it was Queen Victoria who said about Bahai that if it was good it would flourish. It has diminished around here (Canterbury, Kent, England) despite help from the Quakers who lend their meeting houuse to any .........
My understanding of it: This is a law that is not binding as yet but will be in the future. It concerns the administration of lost property that is found and what to do with it. The men of the House of Justice refer to the Universal House of Justice. However this role will almost certainly be delegated to National and Local Spiritual Assemblies. There is nothing to suggest that it will be "men" in the Local or National Spiritual Assemblies who take this on. It makes no sense whatsoever to have male only officers administrating lost property.
The Teachings of Baha'u'llah are self perpetuating and gradually being adopted worldwide by humanity to the dismay of some. (sorry old boy!)
You have provided a reference from Baha'u'llah's writings and suggested that this refers to a gender based role in Local and National Spiritual Assemblies.
. There is nothing to suggest that it will be "men" in the Local or National Spiritual Assemblies who take this on. It makes no sense whatsoever to have male only officers administrating lost property.
I didn't need 72 hours, or even 72 minutes to find it.