Dave Watchman
Active Member
THERE ARE REPORTS THAT THE TRUMP ATTEMPT ASSASSIN IS AN ITALIAN YOUTUBER ANTIFA MEMBER NAMED MARK VIOLETS THESE ARE A FEW VIDEOS FROM HIS SOCIAL MEDIA ACCOUNTS
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You must be watching FOX. Rally goers pretty much agreed to 4. Pundits on NBC give a high count of maybe 7, not to be confirmed until the experts investigate the audios.That's what the news reports have been saying.
Don't blame me for reporting what I'm hearing just as everyone else is here.
Your despicable posts after an attempted assassination attempt are very revealing of your character.So a cookie-cutter style speech. I'm glad I didn't watch it.
We need to at least come together to agree to disagree with each other civilly and respectfully.
Look at how few posts it took for Trump supporters to attack Biden first. You cannot complain about Biden supporters when it was Trump supporters that first changed the subject.Wow, it took 73 posts for someone to finally start with the anti-Trump rhetoric in a thread about someone trying to assassinate Trump.
You guys still surprise me sometimes.
I stand by everything I said, and I am not going to stop saying it.Respectfully I say this kind of language needs to stop. He is not a faciest nor did he try to overthrow an election. Others have called him hitler or liken him to hitler. Crazy people feed off these lies. We will see who this person was and why they did it but please stop for the good of our country.
You quoted a post where I didn't even mention that name? So why the question?If it is a thread about Trump, why do you keep mentioning Biden?
Generally, I think there are issues on which it is inherently disrespectful to certain groups to "disagree" on specific points, an example of which would be knowingly opposing someone's basic rights, including their right to life, or knowingly supporting their being abused.
I see a major difference between recognizing the above and supporting an assassination attempt of a politician holding a rally for a democratic election. The latter is a dangerous rabbit hole that must be nipped in the bud before it could sink a society into chaos.
Lots of fake news out there.
I was flipping the channel back and forth between ABC and NBC.You must be watching FOX. Rally goers pretty much agreed to 4. Pundits on NBC give a high count of maybe 7, not to be confirmed until the experts investigate the audios.
The head of the Secret Service? Definitely not. Perhaps the person in charge of Trump's protection. It is far too early to tell. We do not even know how the shooter got into position yet.
We can have those disagreements sans violence.
A 30 second speech that puts out the usual talking points without real meaning is a cookie-cutter style speech. What's there to despise about that?Your despicable posts after an attempted assassination attempt are very revealing of your character.
Then don't mention him per your own admonishment.You quoted a post where I didn't even mention that name? So why the question?