Little Dragon
Well-Known Member
Magnets...And what do you have in mind regarding Brave New World?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Magnets...And what do you have in mind regarding Brave New World?
Not at all what I said, please reread my post #275.So we are in agreement then? Because I have a funny feeling you answered my question but in one of those little sneaky ways you will try to walk back later. I hope not. But I shall for now assume you have admitted that trans men are men and trans women are women ergo no issues. (A blue marble is a type of marble for example. Ergo blue marbles are marbles)
Transitional surgery hormone replacement and other treatments, are more effective, before puberty is completed.
That seems to me an important consideration. If too old, the treatments are less effective. Why would that be desirable?My issue has little to do with "effectiveness".
The claim that "a transwoman is a woman" is textbook doublethink.I'm a bit lost. Doublethink is in 1984 but but where does it come into play in the trans issue? And what do you have in mind regarding Brave New World?
Not really, double think is holding two mutually contradicting beliefs. Isn't it?The claim that "a transwoman is a woman" is textbook doublethink.
Not really, double think is holding two mutually contradicting beliefs. Isn't it?
Believing a trans woman is a woman, is not double think then. It's dependent on your definition of a woman.
Is it the same as your definition as a genetically born female and to hell with gender identity? Or does the term woman, encompass more than just her birth certificate entries and genetic makeup? For me, I select the latter.
Because science trumps psychological issues. My heart goes out to those which dysphoria, but I don't feel that simply making them feel that it is normal and using drugs are the answer to the psychological issue.I have no idea why you still hold that position when there's no evidence supporting it.
The single article you posted last time didn't back up your claim either.
So why are you still making it?
The psychological issues you are claiming are bogus. That's my point.Because science trumps psychological issues. My heart goes out to those which dysphoria, but I don't feel that simply making them feel that it is normal and using drugs are the answer to the psychological issue.
Sorry to butt in here, but I have to ask:The psychological issues you are claiming are bogus. That's my point.
I don't know what "science trumps psychological issues" is meant to mean. Perhaps you could elaborate.
Oh I see. I rather agree.The claim that "a transwoman is a woman" is textbook doublethink.
It is. It can be a medical issue as well.Sorry to butt in here, but I have to ask:
How is "feeling you're in the wrong body" not a psychological issue?
My current view on that is I'm prepared to treat a person who has had gender reassignment surgery as belonging to the sex they have transitioned to.
agreed,But if not, I consider they still have the sex they were born with, though obviously they need to be treated with as much understanding as I can muster.
It is. It can be a medical issue as well.
I'm talking about a specific claim made specifically by Kenny in the past in another thread, that he alluded to just now on this thread. He was claiming something about transgenderism being the result of trauma then posted an article that didn't back that up.
Sorry, I didn't realize that you probably won't have any idea what we're talking about. Didn't mean to derail your thread or anything.
It is really simple.... Define XX and XYThe psychological issues you are claiming are bogus. That's my point.
I don't know what "science trumps psychological issues" is meant to mean. Perhaps you could elaborate.
I'm old-fashioned when it comes to language and to me "male" and "female" are terms denoting sex. "Gender" is to me a grammatical term. What I meant is that if a man, say, has had reassignment surgery, I am quite willing to treat him as a woman. Is that clear?Are there typos there? I would have predicted you'd have said something like "... sex reassignment surgery to the gender..." ?
But maybe I need to understand how you define sex and gender?
agreed,
I'm old-fashioned when it comes to language and to me "male" and "female" are terms denoting sex. "Gender" is to me a grammatical term.
I'm sorry... but i think you cherry picked as I mentioned other reasons too. Maybe you just saw a certain post without seeing the other posts where I mentioned other issues?He was claiming something about transgenderism being the result of trauma then posted an article that didn't back that up.
No arguments here. Ditto for me.I must be old-fashioned as well, then, because I agree with you that "male" and "female" are terms denoting sex. That's also the way medical organizations currently use them in medical contexts.
No arguments here. Ditto for me.