So you agree what I said was correct?Biological sex
Gender roles
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
So you agree what I said was correct?Biological sex
Gender roles
Yes; now answer my question.Do you know what a hallucinations even is?
I never suggested otherwise.Well, there are more than empirical versus God claims.
There is the whole range of words that are not supernatural, but have no empirical referents, but rather have cogntive/emotional referents.
The tree in my front yard is empirical; science is not necessary to verify this.That you call it real, is not empirical and is not science.
No; the tree in my yard is real to everybody; not just me, because it exists outside of human thought.It is no different than gender as it is in your mind as it makes sense to you.
What tree?No; the tree in my yard is real to everybody; not just me, because it exists outside of human thought.
Again; the tree in my yard is not something that only exists in my mind.But you have no evidence for real. So I won't accept that and don't respect you as it is in your mind.
I’ve never suggested people should only use words that are backed up by science. If you gonna put words in my mouth, make sure they are MY words; quit makin’ stuff up.Use words that are backed up by science as you demand of others, or explain how you are speical using science.
What is rude about it? Please be specific.Rude and disrespectful, but your choice.
No; I claim you are using the wrong words because you are. If you label something "X" due to an outside source, you are not the one assigning it "X", that outside source is.Yes, the doctor uses established criteria to assign the sex of each newborn.
YOU claim I am using the wrong words simply because you dislike the use of certain words.
Are you gonna answer my question?Do you understand that right after the doctor determines the sex of a new born that said sex is not only assigned to the new born child, but even documented on a birth certificate?
I'm not talking about events, I'm talking about a specific tree that is in my front yard.Real, lol. Humans suck at interpretating the world (it's been documented many times that people witnessing the same event will recount it differently).
Come to my house and I will show youWhat tree?
It's odd you would even ask. Calling someone something they've asked you not to call them is rude. The specifics don't even matter, it's basic courtesy and decency. If you call to someone "hey, bean" to get their attention and they say "please don't call me bean" do you keep calling them bean? If you do, that's rude. Seriously, it's not complicated. It's schoolyard bully nonsense to keep calling someone something they've asked not to be called. That basic civil decency escapes certain humans is just odd. This is common sense level of stuff. Don't be a jerk.What is rude about it? Please be specific.
Except that it is the doctor making the determination..No; I claim you are using the wrong words because you are. If you label something "X" due to an outside source, you are not the one assigning it "X", that outside source is.
Yes, I know the difference.Are you gonna answer my question?
its the only conclusion that can be drawn.Well that one gets the strawman of the year award
you obviously don't know because if you didn't you wouldn't be foolish enough to try to conflate a hallucination with an imaginary friendYes; now answer my question.
And you are free to treat this as a conversation and not an interrogation..its the only conclusion that can be drawn.
You are of course free to prove me wrong and actually name these mysterious researchers.
Excuse me?!?Share your opinion. I’ll say 18. Maybe even older. There’s a lot of experimentation that dies out. One should be sure before they attach labels imo. Take a little time…
It’s my opinion. I think young people should think things through a bit more. I know I should’ve.Excuse me?!?
Are you serious?
Do you expect people to ask for validation before identifying with either sex?
I think you need to learn better about transgenderism.
We're talking about kids here, correct? That's the context.Excuse me?!?
Are you serious?
Do you expect people to ask for validation before identifying with either sex?
I think you need to learn better about transgenderism.
The specifics DO matter. If somebody is human and they want you to pretend they are a horse due to mental illness, it is not common courtesy to pretend they are a horse. Words are supposed to have meaning; when you divorce gender from biology, it becomes meaningless. To use a meaningless term like gender when speaking of somebody is not courtesy, it’s better to use a term that has meaning.It's odd you would even ask. Calling someone something they've asked you not to call them is rude. The specifics don't even matter, it's basic courtesy and decency.
When I am speaking to you, the only pronouns I will use are you or your. The pronouns he/him, she/her are only used when I am talking about you to someone else at which time you are not a part of the conversation.If you call to someone "hey, bean" to get their attention and they say "please don't call me bean" do you keep calling them bean? If you do, that's rude. Seriously, it's not complicated. It's schoolyard bully nonsense to keep calling someone something they've asked not to be called. That basic civil decency escapes certain humans is just odd. This is common sense level of stuff. Don't be a jerk.