cambridge79
Active Member
Your link is not relevant to the question I asked.
This man clearly stated his reasons which was "to debunk Erich von Daniken". It is quite obvious that he was scornful etc of what von Daniken said.
Of course it can be construed as an attempt to label this engineer as a crackpot or to ridicule him and his findings.
This is the same kind of ridicule from a stance of ignorance as applied to the German scientists who looked at ancient earth civilization writings from a non-religious or non-mythical point of view. In other words their thought patterns were not stuck in a groove of skepticism, rejection and academia. A true scientist investigates all things and poses questions that the faint of heart hide from and criticize from behind their gossamer shields.
AS AN ASIDE: Were Sister Theresa, F W DeKlerk and Desmond Tutu scientists? Only the gullible believe what they say. In some parts of the world they stink to high heaven Mahatma Ghandi was nominated several times for the Nobel Peace Price yet when he lived in South Africa he exhibited his extreme racism by regarding the black people as less than human.
N.B. on edit - typo corrected
that was to show that simply because he was an engineer doesn't mean he can't be a looney.
also, you can patent anything you want even things that don't work as long as you pay an it's not already patented. Can we have a look on what he has actually patented or we should just stick to the claim that he has patented "something", maybe for the only purpose to be able to say that "he has patented something"