Actually the Bible has lots of scientific errors in there and the Quran has none. I will post after thirty minutes.
Then God committed the mistake of speaking to His audience in terms they could understand.
Do you think it would make any sense for a people who lived thousands of years ago and who had less scientific knowledge to be spoken to in terms that were scientifically accurate but incomprensible to them with the human knowledge available to them?
The Qu'ran, to my knowledge, makes no statements regarding quantum physics. My holy book does. Seriously, should I advance an argument that therefore my book is better than the Qu'ran and you should follow it?
It's an empty argument, S.Z. I know it's popular in Muslims circles, but if those who advance it looked at the responses they get, they might find another tack more useful. This one always falls flat.
Ditto claiming the Bible has been edited wholesale. I've yet to meet a Muslim who advances this claim that has demonstrated any serious knowledge about the manuscript history of Bible texts.
If you want to claim it was edited fine -- tell me who, when, why and show me the variant manuscripts.
My husband is a scholar who does manuscript history. He works on English literature, not religious texts, but the methods are the same.
If you can actually prove your case, have a try.
Other than that, it might be worth reflecting on whether someone you want to communicate with is likely to listen to anything else you say if your first salvo is "The Bible is wrong!" I can't imagine many Christians or Jews would listen further, if that's the starting point. It seems a rather poor tactic, honestly.
Put yourself in their shoes for a minute. Someone tries to explain the truth of their religion to you, and the first words out of their mouth are "The Qu'ran is unreliable!" Be honest with yourself -- what's your first reaction?