It will depend on the price paid for that unity, as well as what is gained from it.
Well I'm hoping not too many broken noses.lol.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It will depend on the price paid for that unity, as well as what is gained from it.
Same here.
It is usually not even a particularly well-informed or honest approach. I would have a lot more respect for the Bahai Faith if it just accepted already that it is an Abrahamic Faith struggling to be perceived as the most recent and complete interaction of same.
Not that it would be very convincing, but it is at least honest.
Yeah. We do. Setting up your book of correspondance,
following the god/s of your chosen mythology from your mythology (etc),
finding the lessons nature teaches
and actually not practicing chaos magic
but a strong interconnection with your faity
with external principals, objects or god/s of worships (say whst they ask you to offer), wiccan rites to druid ceremonies.
Yes, this is all dogma. It makes up what we call religion. And through religion we live in, we live our Paths and see your faith (or whatever you want to call it) as your joourney.[/WUOTE]
No it isn't because none of what you mentioned is necessary to be a Pagan. Pagans don't need to believe in or worship gods (of any number), they don't need a "book of correspondence", they don't need to refrain from "practising chaos magic".
Unless your path is Just an interest like a hobby, most religions have dogma. Its not a nasty word.
Dogma is a pre-defined set of necessary beliefs & tenets:- none of which is required for Paganism.
My what?
Belief in gods is not necessary to be Pagan. There are plenty of Pagan atheists, pantheists etc.
Which, since they are not fixed or determined by holy writ, are not dogma.
I didn't know there was a rule against this - there's a discordian friend of mine who'll be sorry to hear this.
My what?
This isn't dogma, this is practice. It's about what you do, not what you believe. And again, neither Wiccan rites or Druid ceremonies are necessary to be Pagan. You're proposing Paganism is orthodoxic when in reality it is orthopraxic.
When one removes the man made dogmas it makes it much easier. As for pagans it doesn't matter. We accept all humans as part of one human race so pagan or not they're equal humans.
Why shouldn't a homosexual be allowed to join? It's up to them if they feel it's right for them or not.
That is skirting the issue isn't it?
You were asked if homosexuals could join?
Can they join as homosexuals, - or - do they have to suffer in silence and loneliness = no sex, - like in other patriarchal religions?
*
If I remember correctly - this isn't actually true. Baha'is don't actually accept all religions.
What about Pagan religions?
What about Goddess religions?
They seem to be embracing mainly Abrahamic, and major Eastern religions, which are all patriarchal.
Also no trinity, no gay couples, no premarital sex, etc.
EDIT - Just remembered - Baha'i are also patriarchal, though not as bad as most in their thinking. However - no women can hold the highest offices.
*
The Bahai Faith has basic beliefs. We believe in God so it's unreasonable to expect things like paganism to be upheld. Not only Abrahamic Faiths but Hinduism and Buddhism as well as Zoroastrianism. The moral teachings support marriage between a man and a woman only. We understand trinity different to he Catholics.
Of course they can join.
I would rather you did not repeat the mistake of claiming convergence of Buddhism. Or, for that matter, Hinduism.The Bahai Faith has basic beliefs. We believe in God so it's unreasonable to expect things like paganism to be upheld. Not only Abrahamic Faiths but Hinduism and Buddhism as well as Zoroastrianism. The moral teachings support marriage between a man and a woman only. We understand trinity different to he Catholics.
...The moral teachings support marriage between a man and a woman only.
We understand trinity different to he Catholics.
Again - as they are - having gay sex? - Or only if they become monks and live in loneliness without their lovers?
*
Patriarchal teachings that started somewhere, and spread with patriarchy to most of the major religions. Not from any God.
The Catholics aren't the only Christian religion that believes that way. So do you consider Catholics and other Christian religions that believe the same, - to be Pagan, - and unworthy of Baha'i ONE God, religion, togetherness, etc?
What about Mormons?
*
I would rather you did not repeat the mistake of claiming convergence of Buddhism. Or, for that matter, Hinduism.
Patriarchal teachings that started somewhere, and spread with patriarchy to most of the major religions. Not from any God.
The Catholics aren't the only Christian religion that believes that way. So do you consider Catholics and other Christian religions that believe the same, - to be Pagan, - and unworthy of Baha'i ONE God, religion, togetherness, etc?
What about Mormons?
*
And there it is, - the patriarchal put down of other religions that aren't patriarchal, - while lying about the sameness of all religions and people, in an effort to push a newer discriminatory patriarchal religion.
*