Your response is irrelevant. Saddam tricked them into believing they had WMD's. You never addressed the FACTS of my post.
It's their own fault they were tricked. They destabilized the entire Middle East on a hunch that was wrong.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Your response is irrelevant. Saddam tricked them into believing they had WMD's. You never addressed the FACTS of my post.
And... were told was wrong for months up to the decision to go in...It's their own fault they were tricked. They destabilized the entire Middle East on a hunch that was wrong.
I see, we are indeed using different methodologies to quantify corruption.
By this measure, we can say that the UK is the most corrupt, as it started the USA off and is therefore responsible for its corruption.
But wait, the UK was essentially created by England, which is the successor to Germanic states such as Mercia and Wessex, founded by people from what is now Denmark and Germany. So we have to give the prize to Germany!
And... were told was wrong for months up to the decision to go in...
the leadership is always corrupt. who were the enemies of Jesus, the leadership.
It's their own fault they were tricked. They destabilized the entire Middle East on a hunch that was wrong.
Really ? a hunch ?, so breaking a cease fire agreement, murdering people with WMD's, Refusing inspections of a nuclear facility, removing all the video equipment therein to evaluate compliance, 22 times refusing to allow inspections as required by the UN, is a hunch ? What would you require, the detonation of an atomic bomb before reacting ? I see, so you were quite happy with saddams rule, and that of the taliban ? The latter especially liked to use a soccer stadium built for them by the west to shoot alleged adulterous women in the head, daily. The only destabilization that took place was by osama bin obama, and his liberal cohorts. We can see how the moslems play with each other, what a cultureIt's their own fault they were tricked. They destabilized the entire Middle East on a hunch that was wrong.
man for man they are no worse than the next. but as a unit they can do for more damage as there is no one that has more power at its hands.So how is the American the most corrupt?
No, this is being reasonable. The facts are simple, who blows up the planes, stabs people on the street, butchers people in theaters, hotels, on boats or just uses a truck to run children down ? Who comes from the most poorly educated most violent region on earth ? There is a common thread, do you have it ? The Israeli's are far more successful at screening than we, the profile based upon a series of indicators, the first being is a 90 year old woman from Greece more likely to be a terrorist, or a 26 year old muslim male from Libya. The statistics give a most clear answer to this. Protectors deal in probabilities, not political correctness. When the Moslem nations are peaceful and the steady drumbeat of violence and murder by moslems on a daily basis, all over the world, ceases, then I would not blink an eye to one getting on a plane with me. Till then, I will watchI believe it's a meaningful term. When people see a Caucasian man getting on the same flight at the airport as they're on, they don't even notice. They almost certainly don't even give a second thought to what his religion might be. If, however, the person appears to be Middle-eastern, there is the immediate assumption that he's probably a Muslim (which, in most cases, may even be true). The next thought (even though few would admit it) is that he could be a terrorist. It's sad, but I believe it's unfortunately true. IMO, this is Islamophobia.
Look up phobia. Phobia's have always been defined as a fear of something beyond reasonableness. It is only lately with the PC crowd that the word phobia has taken on a new meaning. You don't like or associate with who I like and associate with, therefore you are "phobic". I don't have to find a definition of "islamaphobia", this is a newly coined word along with "homophobia" that is used as criticism for not having the "right attitude". I have been around for many decades, I have seen these evolving terms take root as verbal hammers to slap people. Look up phobia, then islamophobia and homophobia from a dictionary from 1980 and tell me what you find.Then I'll have to ask you to go out of your way to find a dictionary definition that defines Islamophobia as an "unreasonable fear." I gave my definition and provided source, your turn. Let's have a discussion.
Edit: changed "irrational" to "unreasonable"
Look up phobia. Phobia's have always been defined as a fear of something beyond reasonableness. It is only lately with the PC crowd that the word phobia has taken on a new meaning. You don't like or associate with who I like and associate with, therefore you are "phobic". I don't have to find a definition of "islamaphobia", this is a newly coined word along with "homophobia" that is used as criticism for not having the "right attitude".
Really ? a hunch ?, so breaking a cease fire agreement, murdering people with WMD's, Refusing inspections of a nuclear facility, removing all the video equipment therein to evaluate compliance, 22 times refusing to allow inspections as required by the UN, is a hunch ? What would you require, the detonation of an atomic bomb before reacting ? I see, so you were quite happy with saddams rule, and that of the taliban ? The latter especially liked to use a soccer stadium built for them by the west to shoot alleged adulterous women in the head, daily. The only destabilization that took place was by osama bin obama, and his liberal cohorts. We can see how the moslems play with each other, what a culture
This not the debate???
If this is not the debate what would be then???
It's as clear as day that US exploded those building to defame Islam and put Muslims under pressure and introduce Muslims as terrorists
You very well could be right. I supported the invasion because I believed those people deserved a shot at freedom and democracy. I will not let those kind of sympathies get in the way again. Tribal and backward cultures used to and desiring authoritarian rule cannot become democratic. Opposed to then, I now feel that trying to establish democracy for the entire middle east wouldn't be worth the life of one American soldier. I too now regret the invasion, we should have let them keep their butcher dictators. As to nukes, what if we simply ignored saddam, and he had them ? Would you take that risk ?There were no nukes found. In hindsight I don't think the USA would have invaded Iraq if they knew the can of worms they would open. I think they regret it now.
Not crackpots, a plethora of murderersOf course there are many who are paranoid with Islam, don't you read the news ?, this would also be the same for any religion that has crack pots within them.
Usually, when I hear people use the word "Islamophobe" against others, it seems to me that they usually use the word in a way to mean "you're someone who irrationally hates Muslims!"I want to know what people mean when they call someone an 'Islamophobe'.
Yes and Christians have had their share of murdering also in the far past, but sadly many are still living in the dark ages.Not crackpots, a plethora of murderers