• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Why do Christians accuse other religions of believing in false prophets?

Sargonski

Well-Known Member
Sure you did: multiple times.


YES HE DID. It's in the text multiple times.


YHWH. That's the name he uses. I have given the examples again and again YOU need to bring examples of Abe using the name EL. I just did a quick search, I didn't find any. Abe doesn't use the name EL. The only-only example you have is in Gen 14, but he's not speaking to God, and he qualifies it with YHWH as the primary name.


Of course it answers the question. YOU need actual evidence of Abe using the name EL. Just saying, well, "I heard that EL was Abe's god, and of course it was cause I want to be" doesn't work at all.


Who cares? Abe rejected that.



Strawman fallacy - this has always been about Abe not knowing the name YHWH .. not that YHWH was not known in general... and you know this but in desperation to deflect and deny you cry "why why why" and pretend not to understand.

So -- let us be clear .. one more time .. Abe did not know his God by the name YHWH === You claim otherwise crying

"YHWH - thats the name he uses >>> multiple times... as you have been shown" --- and I have addressed your claim .. telling you why YHWH is there .. you completely unable to refute .. and in fact supported my claim that the Israelites were raging Pagans.

but FINALLY -- you tell us the name of the God you Worship .. claiming it is the God of Abraham ... the name used many times in a narrative written by redactors ... after 500 BC during Persian times. so kudo's for that much .. that diversion finally to an end .. like Pulling Teeth out of a Dinosaur .. which you likely believe existed ~6000 years ago .. at the beginning of creation.

but --lest we digress further ---- Why do you believe in the God of Lies and Deceit ? this trickster God .. like Loki .. or perhaps ENKI even better .. though I don't recall either of those others being so vile and nasty as this YHWH God is depicted .. but you are welcome to your story ..

Why do you believe that YHWH lied to Moses .. telling Moses that Abe never knew his God by the name YHWH ?

and - do you think we should kill the child for the sins of the parent and/or Tribe - or should be have a rule in place stating Children are not to be punished for the sins of the Other .. leading to a general "Rule of Law" one person is not to be punished for the actions of another. (so Brilliant on YHWH's part should he choose to give us this rule)

why do you claim that God lied ..by claiming that Abe knew his God by the Name YHWH ?

and all legit theological scholarship agrees .. so don't bother providing some stupid apology from some crackpot fundamentalist nutter. The contradiction is 100% clear .. no linguistic tricks available .. claiming otherwise a lie .. so by their fruit you shall know .. the speakers of Lies .. says our Lord and Savior .. a fellow you don't follow .. but just saying ... the decepticons are out in full force ..


Tell me what to do with the Child ... the Fetus .. and the Baby .. what does your God advise - Kill for the sin of the Tribe .. or not to kill - that is the second question you need answer Brother G.
 

Sargonski

Well-Known Member
Well plainly there are people who still think the Documentary Hypothesis is wonderful and they don't listen to those who say it is crap and who say that archaeology for Israel in Egypt and the Conquest is good and that Moses was a real person who probably wrote most of the Pentateuch.



It's not really like saying Rome had a great empire 1000BC. It could be more like saying that this Ur was the one that the Chaldeans came from.




After reading this you might wonder how finding bones at mining sites and carbon dating them can tell us the earliest time camels were in the ANE. If anything it tells us when camels were used for mining at those mines, that is all. But the study is understandable since it comes from Tel Aviv University, a stronghold of Biblical Minimalism.
And from this site: Camels in the Biblical World | Denver Seminary
Now, there is a lot of debate as to whether Abram/Abraham could have existed at all, etc. Leaving this aside for the moment and focusing exclusively on the question of whether camels were domesticated before the 10th century BCE, this question can be answered unequivocally in the affirmative for the following reasons: 1. Two-humped camels were domesticated by the middle of the 3rd millennium at the latest in regions east of the Zagros mountains; 2. Domestic two-humped camels have been known in Mesopotamia from the end of the third / beginning of the 2nd millennium onwards; 3. Camels were not primarily bred to ‘stay at home,’ but were used to cover vast distances in trade and transport. The end of the 3rd / beginning of the 2nd millennium BCE is known as a period with many long- distance interregional trade contacts. After all, there could well have been individuals that wandered around between Mesopotamia, the Levant, and Egypt with their sheep, cattle, and donkeys, and who had also acquired some two-humped camels in Mesopotamia, directly or via intermediaries. However, as such an individual (or any pastoralist taking advantage of these wonderful animals) did not exploit many camels in hard labor in a specific area over an extended period of time (such as in copper mining), nor engage in intensive overland trade with other regions from a particular location (cf. the finds of Tell Jemmeh), finding any camel remains would be very unlikely.“

Richard S. Hess, Ph.D.
Distinguished Professor of Old Testament and Semitic Languages
Denver Seminary
October 2022



Read Genesis and see that Abraham was given camels from the rich king of Egypt. That does not mean that domesticated camels were owned by everyone.
Why would anyone want to go against the evidence and say camels in Genesis are an anachronism? And I think it does come down to that, wanting to deny the evidence.



I'm sorry, I thought that since you had brought in camels that I could bring in something also, another thing that is called an anachronism but is not. Something that shows the minimalist theories about the Bible and how wrong it is, are not true.



In the Bible my God is called YHWH, often translated as Yahwey or Jehovah.
Holy Carp this was a Load - Why are you posting this absurdity .. Hess completely disagreed with you .. (not about Camels but about the fact that the Torah was written/redacted after 500 BC) as does Modern theological Scholarship .. it is just not debated in remotely serious circles -- that parts of the story in Genesis were written / redacted during the Persian Period After 500 BC - and same for the Entire Torah.. and other parts of the OT ..

Then you moronicly state "Read Genesis" Abe was given Camels by Egypt --- ?????? we are assuming this is in Genesis in the Question .. so why would you tell me to read it ? Never mind the Camels .. too painful to go into the details . as there are so many other reasons -- hundreds -- by which we know that the text was written over time by many many authors .. these texts undergoing major redaction-compilation after 500 BC - during Persian times .. when the Jews go Monotheistic

"MY God is Called YHWH" -- I figured as much believe it or not .. why is such pulling of teeth to get the fundimentalists to admit this ? .. so Kudo's for that much .. and sometimes translated Yahu of the Shasu .. but that is another story :)

but .. that said .. you avoided the main question .. which is "By what name did Abe Call his God" ? The answer NOT YHWH .. according to YHWH ..
 

Sargonski

Well-Known Member
Of course they did..
..they followed what they learned from their environment .. don't we all.

If Moses and Jesus had not been sent by G-d, preaching the Oneness of G-d,
the world would be quite different.

Then why are you arguing against the position that Israel was not Monotheistic ... if you knew they knew the names of the other Gods they were worshiping ?

K -- Clearly Moses didn't help much .. by the time Jesus came round monotheism had been established for 500 years. Jesus on a completely different path ... one that you seem to have missed ... This Priest of the Order of MelchiZedek .. come pay us a visit 2000 years ago.

but that is another matter .. Now we wonder who is the God of this Priest .. the God Most High of the Order MelchiZedek.

El -Sydyk - Misor forming the Holy Trinity .. Sup Muhamu ... So it is Written .. So it shall be Done ..

Now the Jews adopted Monotheism during the Persian timese .. YHWH completely defeated .. the place where his name resides "Destroyed" --- Marduk Triumphing over YHWH .. once and for all .. and that story ended .. the anthropomorphic YHWH dead.

What arose from the ashes was a new and improved divinity .. modeled after Ahura Mazda .. Main "Most High" God of Zoroastrianism .. a form of Monotheism at the top of the religious food chain in Persia.. adopted by the Jews.

Cept one problem --- the God called Yah .. is no longer Yah .. no longer some anthropomorphic God with the most petty and nasty of human traits.. no more xenophobic genocidal maniac .. a flip flopping irrational God --

Yah is transformed ---->>>> Ahura Mazda --
 

muhammad_isa

Veteran Member
Now the Jews adopted Monotheism during the Persian timese .. YHWH completely defeated .. the place where his name resides "Destroyed" --- Marduk Triumphing over YHWH .. once and for all .. and that story ended .. the anthropomorphic YHWH dead.

What arose from the ashes was a new and improved divinity .. modeled after Ahura Mazda .. Main "Most High" God of Zoroastrianism .. a form of Monotheism at the top of the religious food chain in Persia.. adopted by the Jews.

Cept one problem --- the God called Yah .. is no longer Yah .. no longer some anthropomorphic God with the most petty and nasty of human traits.. no more xenophobic genocidal maniac .. a flip flopping irrational God --

Yah is transformed ---->>>> Ahura Mazda --
You see things differently to me..
You judge everything by "names of god(s)", whereas I see that language varies between civilisations,
and it is not so much the name, as the concept.
 
Last edited:

IndigoChild5559

Loving God and my neighbor as myself.
I have never claimed that the God of Abraham is referred to as Zedek. You lost the thread somewhere .. go back and read what you skipped for enlightenment.
Yes, you did, in post #512. You said, and I am pasting it here:
"If you havn't heard of the God of Righteous and Justice Friend .. then let me introduce you to Sydyk/(Sedek) Patron God of Jerusalem during the time of Abraham"

So you changed the spellih from a Z (Zedek) to an s (Sedek) but it is obvious you are talking about the same word, since in your first sentence you mention "God of Righteousness."
 

Brian2

Veteran Member
but .. that said .. you avoided the main question .. which is "By what name did Abe Call his God" ? The answer NOT YHWH .. according to YHWH ..

I don't know if this question was directed to me. However that is hard to say if I believe the translation of Ex 6:3 that seems to say that Abraham did not know the name YHWH.
 

Sargonski

Well-Known Member
You see things differently to me..
You judge everything by "names of god(s)", whereas I see that language varies between civilisations,
and it is not so much the name, as the concept.
Made up silliness Muhamu. --- desperately trying to run from "The Concept" and hide from reality.

Now the Jews adopted Monotheism during the Persian timese .. YHWH completely defeated .. the place where his name resides "Destroyed" --- Marduk Triumphing over YHWH .. once and for all .. and that story ended .. the anthropomorphic YHWH dead.

What arose from the ashes was a new and improved divinity .. modeled after Ahura Mazda .. Main "Most High" God of Zoroastrianism .. a form of Monotheism at the top of the religious food chain in Persia.. adopted by the Jews.

Cept one problem --- the God called YHWH .. is no longer YHWH .. no longer some anthropomorphic God with the most petty and nasty of human traits.. no more xenophobic genocidal maniac .. a flip flopping irrational God --

YHWH is transformed ---->>>> Ahura Mazda --

YHWH's Name died "the place where his name resided Destroyed" What part of this "Concept" are you having trouble understanding ?

Israel was wiped out 160 years prior to this - the people scattered to the winds - assimilated into new lands.. and now the two remaining Tribes who are strugging and on very hard times .. get wiped out by the Babylonians ...

50 years later -all the adults who remember the sack of Jerusalem Dead .. the Persians take over .. and re-establish the Jews as a people ..
During this Period .. a new Religion is created called Judaism ---

The God of this Religion is not the same God ... as the God of the Temple of YHWH -- no longer shagging male prostitutes in the Temple ... this New God divorced from his consort Asherah ..

Concept - (that you failed to understand and/or address) - The God of Judaism is not the same as the God of the Israelites.
 

Sargonski

Well-Known Member
Yes, you did, in post #512. You said, and I am pasting it here:
"If you havn't heard of the God of Righteous and Justice Friend .. then let me introduce you to Sydyk/(Sedek) Patron God of Jerusalem during the time of Abraham"

So you changed the spellih from a Z (Zedek) to an s (Sedek) but it is obvious you are talking about the same word, since in your first sentence you mention "God of Righteousness."

Vacuously confused friend... My informing you that Zedek was the Patron God of Jerusalem at the time of Abraham .. does not mean that Zedek is the God of Abraham. How many times have I told you .. the God of the Patriarchs was EL .. "The Most High" -- El Elyon, El Shaddai, El Oliun

There are many spellings for the name Sydyk -- but is all the same God .. You are partially correct on the Righteousness part .. God of Justice and Righteousness .. and was actually a Twin God .. Misor being the other

Wiki - "Misor" and "Sydyk" mean "Straight" and "Just"[2] (or, in another translation, "Well-freed" and "Just"[3])"

These Semetic Dieties are said to be connected with El .. perhaps an early Trinity example .. related to El as Chief of the Divine Council .. Truth and Justice being part of that designation..

"According to the book of Genesis, Melchizedek king of Jerusalem, was also a priest of El Elyon, “God Most High” (Genesis 14:18). The meaning of the name Melchizedek is “My King is [the god] Zedek.” In the book of Hebrews, the name Melchizedek is interpreted to mean “King of Righteousness” (Hebrews 7:2).

Another king of Jerusalem is called Adonizedek (Joshua 10:1). The meaning of the name Adonizedek is “My Lord is [the god] Zedek.” Thus, the name Zedek and Zadok are associated with the Canaanite god Zedek." Was Zadok a Jebusite?

Zadok -- is a Canaanite High Priest from the Order of MelchiZedek .. High Priest of Jerusalem when David takes the City .. David keeps Zadok as High Priest in Golem


"David and his descendants offered sacrifice in Jerusalem because they were priests. They were priests not because they were Levites, but because they were priests after the tradition established by Melchizedek, king of Jerusalem.

Thus, David appointed Abiathar to serve as the priest for the Israelite population and Zadok to be the priest for the Canaanite population who lived in Jerusalem. Zadok also served in the Tabernacle that was at Gibeon (1 Chronicles 16:39). The Gibeonites were the Canaanite people who deceived Israel in the days of Joshua (Joshua 10:1)."

Zadok is then elevated to high priest over all of Israel - a population of raging Pagans .. YHWH being worshiped along side his Consort Asherah .. officiating the occasional Child sacrifice out back of the various Temples of YHWH ..
 

dybmh

ויהי מבדיל בין מים למים
Your making up nonsense -- I never said anyone got names wrong --- can't seem to understand what is being said to you -- We have two different lineages.. lineages that contradict each other.

No they don't. Have you read them. One lineage has an additional link in the chain. That's an easy mistake to make. It's not a contradiction.

Chronicles was written 500 years after King David appointed the HIgh Priest of AdoniSydyk to High Priest of the Temple of YHWH

Right, so an error in chronicles is understandable.

But, David didn't appoint a priest of AdoniSydyk. That name doesn't actually exist in the Hebrew bible.

, and - unlike you - they noticed a problem .. as while you may not know of the God Zedek

Zedek is not the same as Sydyk. Anyone can see that. And Zedek is just a word. Not a name.

.. they did.. and while you don't know what the Male Prostitute in the Temple of YHWH were for .. They did.. and while you don't know what the High Place out back was for ... and the Asherah Idol

No... that's well known. Solomon had problems, and the Jewish people adopted the practices of the other nations. But that doesn't mean that David appointed priest for some foreign god. The Zadokites were Zealous for YHWH. That's what Zadok means.

.. They did .. and so they made up a levite lineage --"connection"

Ummmm, your own source says the Zedek connection is conjecture. And mainstream scholars reject it. You're elbow-deep into the cow's rectum of bible theories.

Screenshot_20230604_095721.jpg


Screenshot_20230604_095748.jpg




You then compound the nonsense in mind bending desperation .. claiming Prophets speaking after Israel is destroyed .. blaming the destruction on worshiping other Gods.

Compounding. Hah! Can you do simple math?

In order to make this nonsense claim "Zadok is a priest for the patron god of Jerusalem" accuracy is repeatedly sacrificed. It's a chain of weak assumptions, each one compounds the errors. Watch.

The chain is: Sydyk >>> Tzedek >>> Malchi-tzedek >>> Shalem >>> Adoni-tzedek >>> Yirushalayim.

"Sydyk" compared to "Tzedek" has optimistically 3 letters in common. That's a 60% match.
"Malchi-tzedek (My king is righteous)" compared to "My King is the god righteousness" has 4 words in common. That's a 60% match.
"Shalem שלם" compared to "Yirushalayim ירושלים" has 3 letters in common. If the yud towards the end is ignored, that's a 50% match.

Now, a person might look at this and say, Heyyyyyy, that's no too bad." But, this is a CHAIN of logic, so each assumption compounds.

60% >>> 60% >>> 50% = 18% odds of a correct assumption, and I'm being optimistic. Actually, comparing Malchi-Tzedek to "My King is the god Zedek" is only a 50% match, because in english the correct translation is "My righteous king". And the comparrison "Shalem" to "Yirushalayim", is *actually* only a 43% match.

60% >>> 50% >>> 43% = 13% odds of a correct assumption. So you're heavily compounding the errors, and this doesn't even take into account that Zadok's heritage is given, and the Jebusite connection is a much longer chain of assumptions.

????????? --- The overall point being made is that Israel worshiped other Gods

Ummmm, Duh. But that doesn't mean that David appointed an outsider as priest.

... you then cry out that Isaiah stating Israel worshiped other Gods ..

No.... the so-called evidence that so-called scholars use to support this has Isaiah promoting this other God, when he repeatedly says NO OTHER GODS exist. And if those verses are talking about another god "righeousness", then there's another god named "faithfulness". And there's plenty of verses that show that this word zedek cannot be a divine name. So, the theory is a nothing burger.

Its a solution looking for a problem.

"TELLING YOU" that Israel worshiped other Gods .. as if this somehow proves that Israel was not worshiping other Gods .. that the point makes no sense at all on the basis that the Prophets said that Israel worshiped other Gods.

Listen. You're making a big deal out of nothing. Absolute nothing burger.

The common people worshipped other gods. But that doesn't mean the leaders did.

This is horribly fallacious mind bending circular silliness Friend .. What part of The Israelites were raging Pagans --- as told to you by the Prophets you just quoted .. do you not understand ?

I understand. And I have admitted it. But you're taking that to the next level, which is beyond stupid. The whole Hebrew bible is about the common people making mistakes and the leaders trying to convince them to change.

YOU'RE saying "No, no, no, the entire story originally was about worshipping other gods, and someone(s) came along and changed the story 1000s of places but left in these obvious contradictions, and no one noticed that the story was changed."

But, you won't apply a little brain power to all those assumptions and realize that it's all just one big conspiracy thoery that is very unlikely.
 

dybmh

ויהי מבדיל בין מים למים
Strawman fallacy - this has always been about Abe not knowing the name YHWH .. not that YHWH was not known in general... and you know this but in desperation to deflect and deny you cry "why why why" and pretend not to understand.

But you keep claiming that Exodus 6:3 is about Abe not knowing YHWH's name, but, that verse doesn't say that.

Exodus 6:3 is saying that a specific manner, attribute, of YHWH was not known to them , Abe, 'Zach, and Jake. But the "not knowing" is not connected to the name. It doesn't even say "the name El Shaddai". The words "the name" in that part of the verse is added, it doesn't exist in the original. But because you don't know the language, and are using english, ... and don't listen, you keep making the same msitake over and over and over and over

So -- let us be clear .. one more time .. Abe did not know his God by the name YHWH === You claim otherwise crying

And the verse you're basing this one is being misunderstood and mis translated.

"YHWH - thats the name he uses >>> multiple times... as you have been shown" --- and I have addressed your claim .. telling you why YHWH is there .. you completely unable to refute .. and in fact supported my claim that the Israelites were raging Pagans.

dude, Abe was not an israelite. You have only claimed that someone went in and inserted YWHW, but I have yet to see any actual evidence or reasons to make that conclusion.

All of that is based on the DH which has been debunked. Trying to pretend that redactors went in a changed the divine names around was a necessary WEAK assumption inorder to split the text into 4 distinct sources. But doing so pruduced so many different souces, it became ridiculous. Every other verse belonged to different sources.

but FINALLY -- you tell us the name of the God you Worship .. claiming it is the God of Abraham ... the name used many times in a narrative written by redactors

No, not written, compiled.

... after 500 BC during Persian times. so kudo's for that much .. that diversion finally to an end .. like Pulling Teeth out of a Dinosaur .. which you likely believe existed ~6000 years ago .. at the beginning of creation.

You dont know my beliefs, except I believe you are wrong to believe bloogers and Youtubbiez without actually researching the evidence.

but --lest we digress further ---- Why do you believe in the God of Lies and Deceit ? this trickster God .. like Loki .. or perhaps ENKI even better .. though I don't recall either of those others being so vile and nasty as this YHWH God is depicted .. but you are welcome to your story ..

I don't. That's some other non-god.

Why do you believe that YHWH lied to Moses .. telling Moses that Abe never knew his God by the name YHWH ?

YHWH didn't say that.

What's said is:

וארא אל־אברהם אל־יצחק ואל־יעקב באל שדי ושמי יהוה לא נודעתי להם׃​
And I appeared to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob, [as an] almight god, but [I swear by] my name, [my eternal attributes] YHWV, was I not known to them.​
This is because "באל שדי" has the "ב" prefix, and "ושמי" has the "ו" prefix, and "נודעתי" has the "נ" prefix. Unless you can explain those grammatical issues, then you are misunderstanding this verse.

It does NOT mean that Abe didn't know YHWH by the name YHWH. Abe DID know that name, obviously.


and - do you think we should kill the child for the sins of the parent and/or Tribe - or should be have a rule in place stating Children are not to be punished for the sins of the Other .. leading to a general "Rule of Law" one person is not to be punished for the actions of another. (so Brilliant on YHWH's part should he choose to give us this rule)

I'm happy to discuss those important issues after:
  1. You produce a quote of Abe using the name EL when speaking to God OR abandon the claim that EL was Abe's god.
  2. You fill in the blanks of Psalm 82 with your own preferred translation showing that contradictions are being accepted OR abandon the claim that Psalm 82 describes a pagan pantheon
  3. You produce evidence that Zedek was the patron God of Jerusalem OR abandon that claim
  4. You produce evidence hat Zadok was not a levite OR abandon that claim

why do you claim that God lied ..by claiming that Abe knew his God by the Name YHWH ?

Why do you keep ignoring the actual translation of that verse?

and all legit theological scholarship agrees ..

No they don't. You just don't have access to the legit scholars, nor would you know how to judge them if you found them.

I attached a peer-reviewed article confirming what I'm saying. If your blooger-schoolers are permitted, then an actual peer reviewed article should be permitted.

It confirms that the relfexive verb form cannot be intended to mean that Abe did not know the name YHWH. And it also confirms that in context a quesion mark at the end of the sentence might be appropriate.

What YOU need to do is find a scholar who writes about these issues and refutes them. All I've seen is the typical non-critical-thinking approach which is, "The english bible says this, and it agrees with my theory that YHWH was added by redactors, so, I refuse to look at the original language."



so don't bother providing some stupid apology from some crackpot fundamentalist nutter. The contradiction is 100% clear .. no linguistic tricks

No tricks, just grammar. No crack pot, just a real scholar publishing in a real peer-reviewed journal, lacking a paywall so it can actually be read in its entirety.

Of course, you'll never accept it, because, you'll label anything that disagrees with you nuts. But at this point I've brought I think, 5 sources all agreeing with me. And you brought, ummmmm, nothing so far on Exodus 6:3. Again, you need to find someone who addresses the actual language and grammar.

Ignoring the language and grammar means, you're not reading the words of YHWH.

claiming otherwise a lie

No.... I've brought real evidence. real reasons why your theories are weak.

Here. Here's a link to google search results for nifal reflexive. It's a real actual thing, but your sources are either ignorant or lying by omission.

Link to google search results

.. so by their fruit you shall know .. the speakers of Lies .. says our Lord and Savior .. a fellow you don't follow .. but just saying ... the decepticons are out in full force ..

Yeah, I mean, it only takes a "D" to get a "Diploma". So, by their fruits, we can tell, they don't really know stuff. Kinda like you.

Tell me what to do with the Child ... the Fetus .. and the Baby .. what does your God advise - Kill for the sin of the Tribe .. or not to kill - that is the second question you need answer Brother G.

I'm happy to discuss that with you once you have abandoned all this other nonsense. It's a good important question.
 

Attachments

  • editor_in_chief,+EJ_THEOLOGY_11__The+Name.pdf
    271.3 KB · Views: 92

dybmh

ויהי מבדיל בין מים למים
Vacuously confused friend... My informing you that Zedek was the Patron God of Jerusalem at the time of Abraham .. does not mean that Zedek is the God of Abraham. How many times have I told you .. the God of the Patriarchs was EL .. "The Most High" -- El Elyon, El Shaddai, El Oliun

Oliun???? who the heck is that? Is this coming from that bogus PDF you have on file that mistranliterates everything?

OMG, you trying to sound smart is a RIOT.
 

IndigoChild5559

Loving God and my neighbor as myself.
Vacuously confused friend... My informing you that Zedek was the Patron God of Jerusalem at the time of Abraham .. does not mean that Zedek is the God of Abraham.
Again, there is no God named Zedek mentioned in the Genesis passage on Melchizedek. If you disagree, then please supply the chapter and verse.
 

Sargonski

Well-Known Member
But you keep claiming that Exodus 6:3 is about Abe not knowing YHWH's name, but, that verse doesn't say that.

What a terrible post - Hard-core denial of the Obvious.. that which no theological scholar of any credibility denies

"And I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, by the name of " El who Suffices , but by my name "Yahweh" not I was known to them".


What a joke and complete fail in understanding - of course it means YHWHs name was not known to Abraham.. what a grand delusion you are trying to weave .
It does NOT mean that Abe didn't know YHWH by the name YHWH. Abe DID know that name, obviously.
 

Sargonski

Well-Known Member
Again, there is no God named Zedek mentioned in the Genesis passage on Melchizedek. If you disagree, then please supply the chapter and verse.

The name of the God is in the name MelchiZedek

1) Never claimed Zedek was the high God of Abraham
2) never claimed there was a God named Zedek mentioned in genesis outside the name MelchiZedek

Do you have anything other than strawman fallacy --->>> ?? <<<---

Zedek is the Patron God of "Salem" (Jerusalem) at the time of MelchiZedek .. and remained so for 500 years .. When David took Jerusalem Adoni-Zedek was king "My Lord is Zedek" Lord in the YHWH sense .. or the Baal sense ..

What part of "Zedek was Patron God of Salem when the Canaanites held that town .. for at least 500 years" is having difficulty sinking in ?
 

dybmh

ויהי מבדיל בין מים למים
What a terrible post - Hard-core denial of the Obvious.. that which no theological scholar of any credibility denies

I brought you a theological scholar who agrees with me. You haven't brought one who agrees with you.

Anyway, you misquoted.

"And I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, by the name of " El who Suffices , but by my name "Yahweh" not I was known to them".

Nopey nope. I already told you, "by the name of El ..." is Wrong. It's even in the link you provided. Aye-carramba. Let me show you.

Screenshot_20230604_135323.jpg

See that? What ever tranlation you're attempting use, it's not a word-for-word translation.

You said: "And I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, by the name of " El who Suffices , but by my name "Yahweh" not I was known to them".

I scratched out the words you added.

So, let's use your miserable translation.

"And I appeared to Abe and Zach and Jake in El who suffices"

( OK, so appeared in a vision, this was how it appeared )​
"And name of me Yahweh not I was known to them"

( In context, Yahweh is explaining that a promise was made to Abe, Zach, and Jake. The previous chapter ends with Moses asking Yahweh why the Jewish people were stuck in Egypt for so long. Yahweh answers, I made a promise, you think I wouldn't stand by that promise? Without punctuation its difficult, but, all that's needed is a little question mark at the end.)​

What a joke and complete fail in understanding - of course it means YHWHs name was not known to Abraham.. what a grand delusion you are trying to weave .

Well, first of all, you didn't actually quote your own source. As usual you added words to make the verse say what you want.

And no, it doesn't mean that the name was not known. Again, wrong verb form. That would be "הודעתי".
כי־יהיה להם דבר בא אלי ושפטתי בין איש ובין רעהו והודעתי את־חקי האלהים ואת־תורתיו׃​
When they have a matter, they come to me; and I judge between one and another, and I make them know the statutes of God, and his laws.​

So, unless you can bring a scholar that addresses these issues, all you have is one verse in english, and you're ignoring multiple credible sources against you.

Where's a verse that has Abe talking to EL by name? Why can't you bring one? Where's evidence of the 1000s of redactions?
 
Last edited:

dybmh

ויהי מבדיל בין מים למים
The name of the God is in the name MelchiZedek

1) Never claimed Zedek was the high God of Abraham
2) never claimed there was a God named Zedek mentioned in genesis outside the name MelchiZedek

Do you have anything other than strawman fallacy --->>> ?? <<<---

Zedek is the Patron God of "Salem" (Jerusalem) at the time of MelchiZedek .. and remained so for 500 years .. When David took Jerusalem Adoni-Zedek was king "My Lord is Zedek" Lord in the YHWH sense .. or the Baal sense ..

What part of "Zedek was Patron God of Salem when the Canaanites held that town .. for at least 500 years" is having difficulty sinking in ?

You have to make some pretty huge assumptions to get this conclusion. By my math it's 13% odds that it's a match. Why do you believe something so improbable? Your own source says this is not mainstream.

"Sydyk" compared to "Tzedek" has optimistically 3 letters in common. That's a 60% match.
"Malchi-tzedek (My righteous king)" compared to "My King is the god righteousness" has 3 words in common. That's a 50% match.
"Shalem שלם" compared to "Yirushalayim ירושלים" has 3 letters in common. That's a 42% match.

Sydyk >>> Malchi-Tzedek / Shalem >>> Yirushalayim = 60% >>> 50% >>> 42% = 13% odds of a match.

Screenshot_20230604_141636.jpg

 

IndigoChild5559

Loving God and my neighbor as myself.
The name of the God is in the name MelchiZedek
No, it certainly is not. The word zedek in hebrew simply means rightous, and so the name of the priest king is "righteous king." IOW the presence of zedek simply describes thr king; it does not make any reference to some God.

So again, chapter and verse where it mentions a god named zedek.
 

Sargonski

Well-Known Member
I don't know if this question was directed to me. However that is hard to say if I believe the translation of Ex 6:3 that seems to say that Abraham did not know the name YHWH.

Well Kudo's for picking up the ball .. as some are fumbling this question horribly. And yes .. it is generally agreed by Everyone that matters .. that there is no other way to translate this passage .. Abe did not call his God YHWH

So the question is then .. what did Abe Call his God ? what was the name ? Quazi fortunately the passage half tells us .. giving an Epiphet .. rather than a direct name -- but the name is in the Epiphet .. so is all good .. and coincidently the name Given is the most likely of the Gods that Abe would worship .. or anyone would worship if they were going to choose to worship only one .. and wanted that one God to be the "Most High" El Elyon .. or others such as El Supreme .. Psalms 82 refers to the Sons of the Supreme one..

"And I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, by the name of " El who Suffices , but by my name "Yahweh" not I was known to them".
https://www.scripture4all.org/OnlineInterlinear/OTpdf/exo6.pdf

"El who suffices"

Who is that ? (Modern Scholarship claimes El is the God of Abraham for a number of reasons.. but let us pretend not to know) .. It is an epiphet for a God who Suffices .. We have another epiphet thou as well .. When El Shaddai introduces himself to Abe ..

Then we have Abe and MelchiZedek worshiping the God most High And we are told that MelchiZedek is not only King but Priest of "El Olium"
which means "EL Supreme" -- which gives us much more info on the identity .. This is the Supreme one of Psalm 82 -- head of the Divine Council ... Council of EL .. same god being referred to as having many sons "Sons of the Supreme one"

Now .. lets us pretend that we don't know that obviously this Most High .. Supreme God of the Canaanite Pantheon is EL -- the fellow where we get the word GOD from.

The problem for nay-sayers .. is that if all these epiphets are not referring to EL --- then what is the name of the God being Referred to .. and it is not YHWH .. cause Abe did not know his God buy that name .. so .. if not EL .. what is the name of Abe's God .. ---- and it matters not what the nay sayers reply .. because it is not YHWH ..
 

Sargonski

Well-Known Member
Oliun???? who the heck is that? Is this coming from that bogus PDF you have on file that mistranliterates everything?

OMG, you trying to sound smart is a RIOT.

Quite the idiotic nonsense .. Friend .. One moment, please... gives you direct translation from Hebrew to English --- has absolutely nothing to do with me being smart ..

Genesis 14:18 .. The God Abe and MelchiZedek Worship .. the Hebrew Script is translated into Hebrew as - L Al Olium which is renderd in English as El Supreme rendered by the KJV as "Most High God"

The Hebrew Text is from the Leningrad Codex -- What does your translation have.. for this passage smarty Pants :)

You are still hurting over the fact that the name of Abe's God is Not YHWH .. and your calling YHWH a liar.
 

Sargonski

Well-Known Member
No, it certainly is not. The word zedek in hebrew simply means rightous, and so the name of the priest king is "righteous king." IOW the presence of zedek simply describes thr king; it does not make any reference to some God.

So again, chapter and verse where it mentions a god named zedek.

The Hebrew word comes from the Canaanite God representing rightousness .. the Hebrew Language decends from Canaanite.

Sorry friend but what you are saying is scripturally and linguistically way way ignorant of the subject matter -- Zedek is a Canaanite - Phoenician God .... when attached as the name of a King .. thats how things worked in the days of Old MelchiZedek is a Canaanite King .. not a Hebrew King .. his name is the name of the Canaanite God Zedek -- Twin Gods of Righteousness and Justice .. and you were given references .
 
Top