kai
ragamuffin
It does say precisely what it poetically, allegorically, mythologically, and historically means.
Spot on.
spot on indeed!
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It does say precisely what it poetically, allegorically, mythologically, and historically means.
Spot on.
Until you learn to follow a conversation in context and stop presuming I'm just going to have to ignore you.look sandy, if you want to hide and cower behind the bible by using your double talk to justify your hostile remarks....all i have to say to that is
that's just swell.
The Bible has "milk" for the "babes" and "meat" for the adults. Too many babes try to eat meat and puke it back up.
And why is that?Intellectual bankruptcy at its finest.
And why is that?
You must then believe that the Bible is a simple book that can be understood with a perusal?It's merely a bunch of double talk.
It is a typical tactic of the elitist to convince themselves that they have some "meat" understanding of some cryptically vague bit of prose written hundreds of years before they were even an itch in their daddy's shorts.
It is really simple for someone to tell all that disagree with them that they are just to stupid to understand it.
The trick is to feed them the line in a manner that they believe it.
The whole milk/meat/ line is one of the favorite tactics.
You must then believe that the Bible is a simple book that can be understood with a perusal?
And none of those "understandings" happened because the understanding of the Scripture was incomplete?The Bible is a book that can be and has been "understood" in many different ways by many different people since the time the various scriptures the Bible contain were written.
The truly sad part is that each and every afore mentioned "understanding" has those who claim that it is the only possible correct "understanding".
I'll assume that until someone shows me a legitimate and logical reason why, according to Scripture, it is wrong.No, it can still be a very complex book. The problem is the assumption that your interpretation is the correct one.
And none of those "understandings" happened because the understanding of the Scripture was incomplete?
I agree that the confusion comes from everyone believing his own interpretation is the right one. But I think there is some true meaning hidden in there somewhere and the problem is to find it.
What does?
And what does it do?