Wow. You have lawyers in the family? Good for you. Since you’ve turned this into a pissing contest I’ll tell you I’m an attorney at one of the largest firms in the country. About one-third of my work involves abuse cases. You want to keep trying to tell me how this will or will not play out?
OK, be honest with me here.
A woman comes into your office. She is about to publish her memoirs. In them (and in interviews about the book) she claims that three decades ago the president of the United States raped her. She didn't report it at the time. She didn't report it to anybody when he first ran for office. There is absolutely no evidence at all for her claim; no video of the two seen together in the store, no video of the event, no witnesses. All there is, is her claim that he did this. He says he doesn't know her and has never met her, and the only thing you have to THAT is a photo of him standing, with a companion, talking (a receiving line?) to her and her husband. A quick snapshot. That's it.
Other than that, it is very much a he said/she said...and there is absolutely no forensic evidence to support her claim. No witnesses. Nothing...and she very much wants to sell her book.
Would you take that case, knowing that 'contingency' means that all expenses will come out of your pocket, and only if you win the case would you get any money?
Of course, there IS the sheer publicity; it would put your name in front of everybody, and that might well be worth the money. Mind you, that hasn't done Michael Avenatti much good.
OK, let's erase the "President of the United STates" part out. Suppose that the scenario is the same, only the accused person is NOT the President of the US. Suppose he's just Joe Schmo from Idaho, potato farmer. Nobody cares about electing him to anything, and nobody wants to get him fired. Same claim, same utter lack of evidence; it's just that THIS potato farmer just won the lottery and is suddenly a great deal wealthier than he was last month.
Would you take the case then? Perhaps figuring that Joe would hand over money just to get rid of you? I do know lawyers who do that...aren't those called 'nuisance law suits?" or perhaps 'extortion?" Those are actually illegal in California, for all the good laws against them do.
What if Joe Schmo hadn't won the lottery, and he was, well....broke and nobody knows him, or cares? Would you take the case then?
Or would you only take this hopeless and completely unsupported case if the accused is wealthy, powerful, and probably willing to pay in order to get rid of you, or your name wouldn't be put in the papers and social media all over the place?
If the only thing you were going to get out of it was a bunch of bills that you would have to pay, and a complete waste of your time, would you take it?
Never mind. I already know that answer.