Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Also lunakilo, if there is a discussion on religion I think people need to feel comfortable with the idea first. If they agree to the discussion it makes no sense if there is actual dialogue and they are offended by simple statements as opposed to overt attacks.
Also an EDIT: To bring in the atheist vs. theist arguement. It seems from this discussion that it is almost always the atheist who has to bie their tongue and lie through their teeth to protect someone else's beliefs. How is that in any way productive?
I don't see it that way. Being an atheist is a choice related to what we're talking about, and the same applies to it.
If i have a friend who's an atheist, i will apply the same i mentioned earlier.
I agree to an extent but I guess being an atheist myself my view-point is biased towards religious people getting offended by things I say. I always see religious people throw the bible into a discussion and complain when it gets chewed out.
I can't say that i've seen the shoe on the other foot, probably being an atheist doesn't help me see both perspectives. I think atheism is somewhat different given it is a lack of belief and arguably a belief system itself. I think its hard to argue atheism the way one argues something like christianity. Atheism is sometimes less subjective I feel.
Lol, I think courtesy was what I thought of.Kerr, I think I draw a distinction between respect and courtesy. I don't respect religions. I can be courteous to those who practice their religion, though it won't earn them any respect in my mind. That is not to say I won't respect other aspects of their personality.
In that case of course it doesn't matter that they complain, they're the ones who put it out there to begin with, so they basically asked for it. And you'd be completely free of blame in this case, because you are not supposed to hide your criticism or tone it down even when the discussion is opened by the religious person, unless you were being rude about it but of course we'll all agree that this shouldn't be the way its done.
The only considerations that should be made in my opinion are related to the context of the conversation like i said earlier, and who is the person you're speaking to.
Atheism is different of course. Its not a religion, and its a lack of belief in deities basically.
However, an atheist can still push his position on others, and others of course can still criticize the choice of being an atheist in a way that somehow can be put in the same category of criticizing someone else's choice of belief or religion.
Praising Satan is a real ice breaker though.A lot of atheists do push their position. I have to say though that lack of belief in God isn't usually a conversation opener in the say way that belief in god is. Just an observation.
"You don't show respect for my religion!"
What are you supposed to do when someone says that to you?
I have a friend who is Catholic.
We are not as close friends as we used to be because I apparently don't show respect for her religion.
I have respect for her right to live her life according to her beliefs.
I don't have any respect for arguments like <something> is true because <religious book/person> says so.
I don't have any respect for blind faith.
So what I am trying to understand is:
1) What does it mean to respect something?
2) What does it mean to show respect for something?
3) If I think a religion is silly/wrong should I respect it?
4) If I think a religion is silly/wrong should I, for the sake of good relations, pretend I respect it/show respect for it even if don't in my heart?
5) Am I wrong to not respect other peoples religions?
4) I believe you can tolerate/acknowledge a thing you disagree with
.
Not everyone who holds strong religious belief is a wacko fundie, though.Should we have to though?
You probably know that saying you disagree with a fundie is a recipe for disaster.
I wonder if it's more a question of respecting the religious adherent, than respecting the religion itself?