Shermana
Heretic
I understand why someone being from Israel, regardless of their religion or racial makeup, would identify as Israeli. I am a mix of all kinds of different races, but if I was outside the country and someone asked me "what I am", my first answer would be American. What I don't understand is how a religion can carry over the same standards. No other religion does this. Why the special exception for Jews?
From what I understand, it used to be considered that a convert was a "Righteous Stranger" and not necessarily the same "Stock" as an Israelite-gene-carrying Israelite. This religious change up from "Righteous stranger" to "Full fledged Israelite" seems to have been a later ruling, from which I'm not exactly sure, but perhaps to placate a growing liberalism-mindset, perhaps in the "Enlightenment" period. If it were the case that it was always considered such, the High Priest would have no problem marrying a Convert. But they can't. (And in Orthodox Judaism, regular Cohen who marry convert women lose their status as priests and their children aren't considered priests). So thus, there's a few glaring holes in this philosophy and these holes become problematic when discussing the broad stream of ethnic ties to lands.
As you can see, the "religious" explanation of what is a Jew has some unavoidable pit falls which only the "Evil racist" argument can fill in.
Last edited: