No false assumption, SZ. Yes, of course you have posted in other threads. But you did not read carefully enough. I haven't seen you being part of a debate. Maybe I missed it. Is so, please point me in the right direction. A thought has just occurred to me: You do know what a debate is...
I answered. You didn't like my answers.
Analogy? Where? (Don't run away!)
Sweet irony! I understand you very well, SZ. And if you ever do answer my questions (see #1312) I can assure you that I will understand them, unless they are garbled, as is your wont.
But wait!! This is not...
What interpretation do you believe Christians insist upon, F1fan? Please tell me it's not the one with the old man with a long beard sitting on a cloud...
It would be good to get any intelligent answers from you, SZ.
You can ask me whatever you like, SZ I will not refuse to answer. Interesting that you picked that question as an example of one you could ask. Hmm…. ;)
See bold. This is garbled prose. What are you trying to say?
Oh, and...
Oh my! This is from someone who is so irrational that he thinks that if A asks B about the value he (B) sees in the Bible then it has to mean that A sees no value in the Bible. Here is how his thinking process ‘works’.
SZ: I find the Bible to be of some value.
SAM: What value do you...
Are you really saying that my asking about the value you see in the Bible implies that I see no value in the Bible?
Wow! Your mind operates in a weird way! Of course I see value in the Bible, SZ. I am a Christian. :rolleyes:
Can you tell us which of Jesus’ teachings you find to be...
You are still missing the point, SZ. Soapy does not have to use the same ‘methods’ to be an acolyte. I assume you do know the meaning of the word...:confused:
What value do you see? And why are you annoyed when
someone's interpretation is different to yours?
Oh, I would be really...