Thank you, very informative :)
eternal hellfire / destroyed forever; still seems immoral to do this to the woman, no?
Regardless of what scripture actually says, people believe in the heaven and hell I described in the OPMost Americans believe in heaven … and hell
I assume the same people know...
I think it's unfair and immoral to deny this woman paradise. She was not given sufficient evidence of God’s existence to make a decision. Why would He demand worship of people who can't make an educated decision, and must believe based on bad evidence?
Why is everyone denying this! It's very clear, if you worship a different god you are breaking the first commandment. Children all over the world have been taught that hell awaits those who disobey Yahweh (or Allah) and heaven ( or paradise) awaits those who obey.
I said the women heard of other religions but chose Hinduism. In other words, she rejected Christianity.
Do you believe the commands of God are nonsense? Rule # 1:
"Thou shalt have no other gods before me"
And I'll add that a serial killer sentenced to death can accept the one true God, go through the process of having his sins absolved, and then he can go to heaven after death for all eternity. That is disgustingly immoral.
My argument is simple.
It is immoral to send a good person to hell for the sin of worshiping another god.
A girl is born in Pakistan into a Hindu family. Throughout her life she proves over and over again that she is the perfect archetype of a principle centered moral and just person. She has...
To be fair to my original statement, if scientists want to make religious claims, then they should justify them using religion's standards of proof.
1. The universe is infinite and doesn't have a start
2. The reason for our existence is to do experiments with mice and eat birthday cake once a...
Only when religion makes falsifiable scientific claims, then I think religion is obligated to justify itself scientifically.
The more magic that is used to justify a claim however, the weaker it gets. If I was religion's lawyer, I would advise it to "plead the fifth"
This statement basically means that there is no way to have a rational conversation with people like you. Anything and everything can be accepted or dismissed in your favour.
It's like playing a game with someone who changes the rules at will and never loses. It kind of makes the game...
It sounds like you are trying to be a good person and a productive member of society. You want to help others feel happy and fulfilled, and stop them from making mistakes that have immense consequences. You have urges to do selfish things, but you refrain because it is the morally right and...
Lol, you are either completely delusional, psychotic, or trolling us. You should seriously consider seeking help for 2 of those.
Either way, I will not be engaging in conversation anymore.