We Never Know
No Slack
Maybe what?Maybe. I do have to sleep at night.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Maybe what?Maybe. I do have to sleep at night.
Well then if it isn't going to satisfy you, evidently you need to think about it some more.Maybe self satisfaction, maybe not, who knows. I haven't thought that much about it one way or the other.
How do you know this?By what I know, it is common in U.S. to let most of criminals go free.
Aye, he's gotten away with wrongful acts thatFor some reason there is totally different set of rules for Trump.
That is wrong.For example in New York it is ok to try to murder people....
Many people in NY go to prison for "petty" reasons., but if you name is Trump, you may have to go to jail for some unknown petty reason.
Your article cites one example, & makes it writ large.
I'm ok with this. Not sure why you're notBy the standard Trump is judged, I am sure anyone can be judged.
Nope., like I said, unless every vote makes a difference in an area, there's no point in it in my opinion. Meanwhile, I do have to sleep at night.Well then if it isn't going to satisfy you, evidently you need to think about it some more.
Hate to see you not vote for either grumpy old man and then be unsatisfied with your choice of doing that.
That’s right. No one is above the law including Trump.By the standard Trump is judged, I am sure anyone can be judged.
It’s been widely reported in reputable news. It’s been posted in these discussions. If you are interested it is easy to find.But, I have been asking, what were the laws Trump broke, and what is the evidence for that.
Do you know is there some place where those are told exactly?
But you have no credibility. So your judgment is irrelevant.Says you. Ok
I must say it seems you're a little bit unstable there yourself.
Seems OK to me. He even got privileges that many of us couldn't afford like breaking gag orders routinely. I think it was a fair trial with the correct verdicts. Seems like the justice system worked in my opinion.Well since this is religious forums...
We have heard what strong dems and strong repubs think...
So regardless of party what do the Christians here think of Trumps convictions.
Point to one decision he made that favored the defense.
Yeah, when the law is anything "democrats" say.That’s right. No one is above the law including Trump.
I don't think that is exactly what I asked. But, thank you anyway. I think that will be useful.It’s been widely reported in reputable news. It’s been posted in these discussions. If you are interested it is easy to find.
District Attorney Bragg Announces 34-Count Felony Indictment of Former President Donald J. Trump
“The People of the State of New York allege that Donald J. Trump repeatedly and fraudulently falsified New York business records to conceal crimes that hid damaging information from the voting public during the 2016 presidential election,” said District Attorney Bragg. “Manhattan is home to the counmanhattanda.org
But one will be president and impacting all of our lives. Maybe you couldn't do anything to stop the damage but maybe you could have done something to minimize the damage.I don't know or care, to be honest. I am just glad that neither of those men will be on my conscience.
Not in my area.But one will be president and impacting all of our lives. Maybe you couldn't do anything to stop the damage but maybe you could have done something to minimize the damage.
Spoken as if democrats aren't legitimate in the USA and only republicans can rule. That is where your attitudes are anti-American, and republicans corrupt. Women in red states have to follow the anti-abortion laws of republicans, so it goes both ways.Yeah, when the law is anything "democrats" say.
Keep imagning nonsense if that helps you cope with your criminal candidate's ongoing criminal problems.It is interesting, if we would for example still keep the Nuremberg code, Joe Biden and his regime could be judged the same way as Nazis. Luckily for them, they are above that law.
Another bogus claim with no evidence and no argument, so we throw it out. You must have heard this on right wing disinformation media.Also, Joe Biden has broken the presidential oath by going against freedom of speech, which in normal case would be a very good reason for impeachment. But, luckily for Biden, he is above normal rules.
Isn't it horrible that women dare believe they are equal to men? What's the world coming to when women can be sexually assauted by a man and demand he be held accountable? Does that make you feel impotent?Also, in modern times word of a woman can be enough to judge person for a rape, like in the case of Trump.
She had serious credibility issues if you actually followed reputable news. Nothing in her claims is consistent with facts and Biden's character. Trump has a history of sexual assualt allegations, and is even on tape bragging how he can assault women and get away with it. There are 26 allegations of sexual assualt by your guy. You know, the guy found guilty of sexual assault, defamation, numerous fraud cases, and 34 criminal acts, with three more trials in the works.If Biden would not be above the rule, he would be judged the same way as Trump, because raped Tara Reade.
If you actually read the charges and understand the legal theory, it will be useful for you to understand that Trump is rightly convicted. It's your choice to support a criminal candidate.I don't think that is exactly what I asked. But, thank you anyway. I think that will be useful.
That was Trump's intent as part of a conspiracy with others using tax fraud, and campaign finance crimes. Do you understand the 34 counts? Every time Trump signed a check that went to pay back Cohen it was a criminal act furthering a prior crime. And Trump was even president for some of these crimes. The prosecution made their case, Trump's defense made thier case, and the jurors found Trump guilty on all counts.If I understand correctly, the crime was:
"conceal damaging information and unlawful activity from American voters before and after the 2016 election".
The criminal act WAS interfering with reporting that Trump cheated on his wife, who had just had a child. What does your Christians attitudes think about that act? Stick your head in the sand? Just pretend Trump isn't a cheater? With a porn star? Are you OK with that? You claim to be Christian, yes? Does it mean anything?Interesting thing that the problem seems to be the concealing, not the "criminal activity".
Irrelevant, Hunter was never a candidate. He has been nothing but a citizen with the right to privacy. The only reason corrupt republicans are going after him is because he's the president's son, and they are using him as a proxy. And the laptop has been in so many different hands that it's worthless as evidence. Let's not forget that Republican Comer has been trying to make a case against the "Biden Crime Family" and has totally failed to present any evidence. Comer is a hack, and a complete idiot. He's done nothing but make Biden look clean. He should have just lied on FOX News instead of opening a congressional investigation that found no criminal activity.However, if the reason is the concealing, Hunter Biden laptop story was also concealed. Should the people who did that be judged the same way?
Nope. It's a routine practice used against mob boss types when they try to intimidate the jury, like Trump did.The mere presence of a gag order ina defendant doesn't give you pause does it?
That's what prosecutors do.You should have said that.
No it's the same thing. Bragg was elected on the promise to "get trump". That's not justice it's revenge.
I don't like rich guys grabbing my genitals without my consent. I don't like poor guys grabbing my genitals without my consent. I don't like anyone grabbing my genitals without my consent. Do you?If you are rich, you will find out that many women allow things that they would not allow from a poor guy.
Some people have a hard time reporting sexual abuse when it occurs because it's humiliating, degrading and they fear they won't be believed.Yes, and it is interesting how different that case is, in comparison to Trump case. I appreciate that Lewinsky didn't wait 30 years before making the claims.
Google is your friend. Inform yourself.Would be nice to know, what exactly was the crime and what is the evidence for the crime.
One of them took him to court, testified under oath, and won.The problem with that is, how can we know do they lie? What could you do, if suddenly 25 women would claim you have raped them, and the judge would believe them without any evidence?
I would like to see the evidence.
That will be little consolationShe will make it, see it and know it.
Self-satisfaction of not giving it to either of the grumpy old men.
It's mind bogglingNot in my area.
Nope. It's only purpose though was to stop trump from talking. He didn't intimidate anyone. Oh wait in forgot about "micro-aggresssions". Wheres the nearest safe space!!!!!!!Nope. It's a routine practice used against mob boss types when they try to intimidate the jury, like Trump did.
Do you think this was like, the first time a gag order has ever been issued?