outhouse
Atheistically
No rhetoric
Please learn how to use the quote feature correctly
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
No rhetoric
Please learn how to use the quote feature correctly
That's beside the point
Its time your learned bud. It is no disrespect.
You simply highlight the text you would like to reply to, [you know it turns blue when you left click and cover the text]
You then wait a second and a text will pop up asking if you would like to quote that text.
Click quote
In the bottom of the reply box below you will see another box "add quote/s" click on that.
You simply highlight the text you would like to reply to, [you know it turns blue when you left click and cover the text]
You then wait a second and a text will pop up asking if you would like to quote that text.
Your not an enemy
you know short for buddy
and the truth you reject.
I'm not picking on your faith.
But,, throwing mud from biased websites
I'm no easy catch.
That is not a biased website, if we could label anything as bias it would by your link YOU provided
Wiki supplied both side to the story, not just one side like yours.
What do you call it when only one side is presented? I like bias
That is not a biased website, if we could label anything as bias it would by your link YOU provided
When you implied a possible time period "coming soon"
Actually, I provided the link. For the purpose of info for this discussion.
,, "coming soon" could be 100 years for some
That is up to the Christian to decide
Secondly,, you have failed to bring forth any evidence of anything.
You said soon.
If you are interested in a detailed answer about the End Times and those events soon to come, I would advise finding a copy of:
The Great Controversy by Ellen G. White.
I call it propaganda.That is not a biased website, if we could label anything as bias it would by your link YOU provided
Wiki supplied both side to the story, not just one side like yours.
What do you call it when only one side is presented? I like bias