McBell
Unbound
lolThere is no way the posted link is "short and to the point". If we have looked at two different articles then to call it that is a "mistake". To lead me to believe he @Mestemia actually thinks that article I saw (because I followed the same link as he) is "short and to the point" is lying imho.
Some people (not me anymore) can think, "I might consider that article short and to the point", then he has lied.
Why not? Because he doesn't want to lie? It wasn't his intention? Because to lie is to be a liar and he knows he isn't?
I go away thinking there are people who see complication and call it, "short and to the point". It might be short by some perspectives. But it isn't to the point! Which point?
It seems there might be a hundred points in that article.
My apologies.
I just couldn't help myself.