Father Heathen
Veteran Member
It's here in VA. I don't recall seeing it in Indiana, though.You have Stubb's there? I never saw it in Indiana and I assumed it was a thing here.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It's here in VA. I don't recall seeing it in Indiana, though.You have Stubb's there? I never saw it in Indiana and I assumed it was a thing here.
You don't need to be a far right fanatic to have issues with many of the transgender issues going on today.It is all free publicity. Both for Anheuser Busch and the far right beer (they do not seem to realize that fascism is on the far right).
Did public awareness of Enron tend to help it? Did public awareness of the issue with Papa John help his restaurant? There are countless cases of public awareness having a negative affect on business.Both companies will profit from it since anything that raises public awareness of a product tends to help it. I am thinking that A B will profit quite a bit more.
Did public awareness of Enron tend to help it? Did public awareness of the issue with Papa John help his restaurant? There are countless cases of public awareness having a negative affect on business.
That tends to be when they are real things to complain about rather than butt hurt parents and political partisans.Controversy does not always sell. A quick look into the real world and you will see countless instances where controversy has lead to damaging companies, even driving them out of business. No my friend; controversy is not always a good thing.
Here's the difference.Did public awareness of Enron tend to help it? Did public awareness of the issue with Papa John help his restaurant? There are countless cases of public awareness having a negative affect on business.
There are people for and against among all generations concerning this issue.For transgender issues, though, there's a lot of support amongst younger generations. I bet Budweiser is banking on the future.
They're not drinking Budweiser and aren't going to start. Only poor white people (aka rednecks) and frat boys drink that crap. Hence the backlash.For transgender issues, though, there's a lot of support amongst younger generations. I bet Budweiser is banking on the future.
Who decides what is a real thing to complain about? You? Or the person complaining.That tends to be when they are real things to complain about rather than butt hurt parents and political partisans.
How does this difference support your claim that all publicity is good for business?Here's the difference.
Enron was scramming, lying, cheating and defrauding a lot of people.
John Schnatter was unapologetic about saying racist and misogynist things.
There are people for and against among all generations concerning this issue.
An example of a corporation abandoning/offending it's base in an effort to appeal to those who never liked them in the first place.They're not drinking Budweiser and aren't going to start. Only poor white people (aka rednecks) and frat boys drink that crap. Hence the backlash.
Whenever I look at youtube videos of transgender women competing against biological women in sports, or transgender women in women’s locker rooms, the comments of the video are mostly against the transgender ideology.Sure, but the "for" outweighs the "against" in this case. And amongst the "against" there will always be people who are not fans, but do support freedom to be who you are regardless of personal views and so aren't going to care.
The problem with LBGTQ is not all of the LGB are in agreement with the T or everything under the umbrella of Q. I know there is an effort to conflate them as one, but they are not; nor are they all in agreement.It makes sense for companies to support LGBTQ rights. Hence why it's going to be hard for folks against Bud Light to find a large domestic beer company that hasn't supported these issues.
Kid Rock brought attention to the issue. I personally have never seen the commercial, the only way I heard about any of this is from people talking about it. The more attention brought to this issue, the more people will know and talk about it; and this added attention could result in many people who otherwise might have never heard about it, reacting to this issue in a way they would not have otherwise.
Nor are all the Ls big fans of the Bs or the Gs. And some white people hate being grouped into the category of "human" with non-white people. Not everyone has to 100% agree uniformly like an amorphous blob in order for their grouping together in certain contexts to be an overall social benefit.The problem with LBGTQ is not all of the LGB are in agreement with the T or everything under the umbrella of Q. I know there is an effort to conflate them as one, but they are not; nor are they all in agreement.
They're not drinking Budweiser and aren't going to start. Only poor white people (aka rednecks) and frat boys drink that crap. Hence the backlash.
An example of a corporation abandoning/offending it's base in an effort to appeal to those who never liked them in the first place.
Enron was not in the business of selling goods directly to consumers. Transgender is a new problem for society. It will take some time to work everything out. That is still not an excuse for transphobia.You don't need to be a far right fanatic to have issues with many of the transgender issues going on today.
Did public awareness of Enron tend to help it? Did public awareness of the issue with Papa John help his restaurant? There are countless cases of public awareness having a negative affect on business.
Interesting. I do like the sauce. And a very nice Wikipedia write up.You have products like Stubb's barbeque sauce with his face on the label. The difference is that he was a real guy who created the product rather than a stereotypical caricature.
Christopher B. "Stubb" Stubblefield - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
The way you're going on about it suggests it isn't "nothing" to you.Yeah, I know she's fictional, a brand mascot. That was over a century ago. She hasn't looked like a "mammy" in decades, just a grandmotherly black woman. And who was thinking about slavery over this? I know I wasn't. It's pancakes, ffs. This is much ado about nothing.
Oh, it doesn't.How does this difference support your claim that all publicity is good for business?
Hey, they suck too!Same thing happened with Keurig coffee machines a few years ago:
Conservatives are posting videos of themselves smashing their Keurig coffee makers to smithereens amid the Sean Hannity controversy
Keurig's decision to pull its advertising from a Fox News show is not going over well with some viewers.www.google.com
And those things cost more than beer!
And I'm sure that @Kfox can show us how this boycott made Keurig's parent company's profit, share price, or something go down.Same thing happened with Keurig coffee machines a few years ago:
Conservatives are posting videos of themselves smashing their Keurig coffee makers to smithereens amid the Sean Hannity controversy
Keurig's decision to pull its advertising from a Fox News show is not going over well with some viewers.www.google.com
And those things cost more than beer!